South Korean crypto exchanges recorded a 62% surge in stablecoin trading volumes as the won fell to multi-year lows against the dollar, prompting platforms to intensify marketing campaigns around dollar-pegged tokens.

According to The Korea Times, trading volume in Tether (USDT) across the nation’s five major won-based exchanges climbed to 378.2 billion won ($261 million) when the exchange rate exceeded 1,480 won per dollar last Wednesday, citing CryptoQuant data.

The spike follows mounting currency pressures that pushed the won through nine consecutive days of declines against the dollar, marking its longest losing streak since 2008, Bloomberg reported.

Major exchanges, including Korbit, Coinone, Upbit, and Bithumb, launched aggressive promotional campaigns centered on stablecoins, including USDC and USDe, waiving trading fees and distributing rewards to boost volumes during what industry officials described as a downturn in broader crypto markets.

Banks Slash Dollar Rates as Government Defends Currency

According to The Chosun Daily, South Korea’s major commercial banks slashed dollar deposit interest rates to near zero in response to government pressure to defend the exchange rate.

Shinhan Bank cut its annual rate from 1.5% to 0.1% starting January 30, while Hana Bank reduced rates from 2% to 0.05% for its Travelog Foreign Currency Account.

The coordinated move followed the authorities’ summoning of bank executives and their request that they “refrain from excessive marketing that encourages foreign currency deposits such as dollars.”

Banks responded by introducing incentives for won conversion, with Shinhan offering a 90% preferential rate for customers converting dollar deposits back to won, plus an additional 0.1 percentage point rate boost for those subscribing to won-term deposits afterward.

Dollar deposit balances at the five major banks fell 3.8% from month-end to 63.25 billion dollars as of January 22, marking the first decline after three consecutive months of surges.

Corporate deposits, which account for 80% of all dollar holdings, dropped sharply from 52.42 billion dollars at year-end to 49.83 billion dollars, suggesting that the authorities’ recommendation to sell dollars spot, combined with perceptions that the exchange rate had peaked, was driving the decline.

Individual dollar deposits grew at a significantly slower pace, rising just 109.64 million dollars, compared with the previous month’s 1.09 billion dollar surge.

Presidential Intervention Accelerates Won Stabilization

President Lee Jae-myung delivered a rare verbal intervention on the exchange rate during a January 21 press conference, stating authorities predicted the rate would drop to around 1,400 won within one to two months.

The won-dollar rate immediately fell from 1,481.4 won to 1,467.7 won following his remarks, closing at 1,471.3 won.

Market observers noted the unprecedented nature of a sitting president specifying both an exchange rate target and timeline, with Lee’s statement carrying significantly more weight than U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s earlier comment that the won’s recent decline was “inconsistent with Korea’s strong fundamentals.”

Meanwhile, demand for dollar exchange slowed as average daily won-to-dollar conversions reached 16.54 million dollars from January 1-22, while dollar-to-won conversions surged to 5.2 million dollars daily, significantly exceeding last year’s 3.78 million dollar average and indicating increased profit-taking.

In fact, according to CNBC, South Korea’s fourth-quarter GDP growth slowed to 1.5% year over year, missing economists’ forecasts of 1.9%, as construction investment shrank 3.9% and exports pulled back 2.1% from the previous quarter.

The won has lost nearly 2% against the greenback this year, making it one of Asia’s worst-performing currencies, while South Korean retail investors bought approximately 2.4 billion dollars of U.S. equities on a net basis through mid-January, up roughly 60% from the same period last year.

The broader economic slowdown comes as Seoul advances major crypto policy reforms despite regulatory gridlock over stablecoin governance.

Earlier this month, South Korea ended its nine-year corporate crypto trading ban, permitting listed companies to invest up to 5% of equity capital in top-20 cryptocurrencies, while lawmakers passed amendments to the Capital Markets Act and Electronic Securities Act establishing legal frameworks for tokenized securities trading beginning January 2027.

South Korea has launched guidelines, allowing listed companies and professional investors to invest up to 5% of their equity capital crypto.#SouthKorea #CorporateCryptoInvestment #CryptoInvestmenthttps://t.co/d55u3TDsBF

— Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) January 12, 2026

Korea Exchange Chairman Jeong Eun-bo pledged to launch spot Bitcoin ETFs and extend trading hours to 24/7 as part of efforts to eliminate the “Korea discount,” though comprehensive digital asset legislation remains stalled amid disputes between the Financial Services Commission and the Bank of Korea over stablecoin issuance rules.

The post Stablecoin Trading Surges 62% in Korea as Dollar Strengthens Against Won appeared first on Cryptonews.

South Korean authorities have come under scrutiny after a large stash of seized Bitcoin went missing during a routine check. The loss was discovered when officials found that some of the wallets that had been held as criminal evidence were empty.

According to multiple reports, the value of the missing Bitcoin is about 70 billion won — roughly $47.7–$48 million.

How Officials Found The Theft

Reports say the gap showed up during a routine audit of confiscated digital assets at the Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office.

An internal check flagged transfers from wallets that had been marked as evidence, and investigators traced the movement back to external addresses. The office immediately opened an inquiry to determine how access was lost and whether any recovery is possible.

Initial findings point to a phishing scam as the trigger. According to local coverage, a staff member accessed a fraudulent website that impersonated a legitimate service, and that interaction exposed passwords and private keys.

Once the credentials were captured, the Bitcoin was moved out in transactions that cannot be reversed.

Security Lapses And USB Storage

Reports note that some of the access details for the seized assets were kept on portable drives rather than in hardened custody systems.

That practice appears to have made it easier for attackers to grab the keys once the phishing trap was sprung. Simple mistakes can cost millions when the asset is bearer-like and transfers are final.

The theft has raised hard questions about how state agencies handle crypto. Some experts say that the tools used by prosecutors were more suited to personal use than to government-level custody.

There are calls for stricter rules, multi-signature setups, and cold storage protocols that do not rely on easily copied passwords.

Tracing The Bitcoin

Blockchain records show the funds moving through several wallets after the initial transfer. That public trail gives investigators leads, but tracing tokens to a final cash-out point is often slow and requires cooperation from foreign exchanges and on-chain analytics firms. Reports say authorities are working with outside specialists to map the flow.

What Prosecutors Are Doing Next

The Gwangju prosecutors’ office has vowed a full probe, and officials are trying to reconstruct events step by step.

There are also signs that the incident will trigger a review of national procedures for holding seized digital property. Some lawmakers and legal experts have already called for clearer standards and oversight.

Featured image from Pexels, chart from TradingView

South Korean prosecutors are investigating the disappearance of a significant amount of Bitcoin that had been confiscated as criminal proceeds, after an internal audit suggested the assets may have vanished while under state custody.

The Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office believes the loss likely occurred during the management period last year and is treating the incident as a suspected phishing attack, raising fresh concerns over how seized digital assets are stored and safeguarded.

According to a senior prosecution source cited by local media, preliminary internal assessments suggest the missing Bitcoin was worth roughly 70 billion won, or about $48 million, at the time of the loss.

Seized Bitcoin Lost After Wallet Password Exposure, Officials Say

An official at the prosecutor’s office stated that the investigators are striving to establish the locations of the seized properties, but they could not verify any additional information at the moment.

Local news states that the bitcoin was linked to an illegal gambling situation and that it was being seized as an illegal piece of property when it was lost.

The estimates reported in the domestic media indicate that the value might be in tens of billions of won, which would translate to several million dollars, but those numbers have not been verified by prosecutors.

The early evidence indicates that the bitcoin was stored in a portable USB, as opposed to a more durable custody system.

The wallet password was also reported to have been revealed to a third party during a regular examination of confiscated items, which provided an opportunity to illegally access it and transfer money.

@KoinlyOfficial warns a third-party breach may have exposed user emails but stresses that no wallet, transaction, tax, or portfolio data was shared with Mixpanel.#CryptoSecurity #CryptoTax #Koinlyhttps://t.co/ASDxMchfyg

— Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) December 23, 2025

The case is one of the most recent high-profile cases of stolen cryptocurrency being re-stolen by law enforcement via social engineering instead of technical merits.

Phishing attacks are deceptive, not technical, as they take advantage of a trusting party. In a more institutionalized environment, they usually prosper through human error and poor internal controls as opposed to blockchain weaknesses.

South Korea’s Expanding Authority Over Seized Digital Assets

The Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office is no stranger to large crypto seizure cases. In March 2024, it pursued the recovery of roughly 170 billion won, or about $127 million at the time, in Bitcoin linked to another illegal gambling operation.

The seizure of digital assets has been gradually institutionalized in South Korea in recent years after several landmark Supreme Court decisions made it clear that cryptocurrencies can be regulated as property under the Criminal Procedure Act.

South Korea's Supreme Court rules Bitcoin on exchanges can be legally seized under Criminal Procedure Act, establishing precedent as regulators expand asset freeze powers and AML enforcement.#SouthKorea #Bitcoinhttps://t.co/3fa5PxHMMG

— Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) January 9, 2026

Such a legal basis was initially established in 2018, when the Supreme Court decided that cryptocurrencies are intangible assets and have economic value and thus can be seized in case they are linked to a crime.

Later judicial decisions have further broadened the power of the seizure, and a December case verified that the bitcoin kept on domestic exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb may also be confiscated.

The recent case arrived on the day when the South Korean regulators are busy increasing control over the crypto industry.

In January, financial regulators announced an intention to test a payment freeze system whereby investigators can temporarily freeze crypto-related accounts before the suspected illicit funds are taken off or deposited in an offshore account.

The post South Korea Probes Theft of Seized Bitcoin Worth $48M in Suspected Phishing Heist appeared first on Cryptonews.

• The one-exchange-one-bank model is not a legal requirement but is widely followed.
• A government study found the setup limits access for small crypto exchanges.
• Large platforms dominate Korean won-based trading due to better liquidity.

South Korea’s top regulators are reportedly reviewing how local cryptocurrency exchanges work with banks, aiming to create a more balanced playing field.

The current system often links each crypto exchange to just one bank, limiting choice and creating high entry barriers for smaller firms.

Though this setup isn’t officially required by law, it has become widespread due to anti-money laundering and identity verification rules.

The Financial Services Commission and the Fair Trade Commission are now coordinating a review to see whether this long-standing practice is stifling competition and reinforcing the dominance of a few large exchanges.

Rules may favour bigger exchanges

Under the existing system, exchanges need to form exclusive partnerships with domestic banks to allow customers to deposit and withdraw Korean won.

Without that link, they can’t offer basic fiat services.

The model emerged in response to growing demands for transparency and risk control, but may now be working against smaller market participants.

A recent study commissioned by the government explored how current crypto regulations impact competition.

According to findings reported by local outlet Herald Economy, researchers concluded that the one-to-one exchange-bank setup makes it harder for newer or smaller exchanges to access banking services.

Even though it helps manage financial risks, applying the same strict standards across the board may be excessive when firms vary in size, volume, and risk profile.

The study also noted that most Korean won-based crypto trading happens on just a few large platforms, making the market highly concentrated.

Liquidity gap highlights entry barriers

The research pointed out that when a few platforms dominate trading volume, they benefit from deeper liquidity and faster transactions.

This creates a cycle where users are more likely to choose the bigger players, further limiting the reach of smaller exchanges.

As long as banking access remains difficult, that pattern is unlikely to change.

This concentration may make the market less dynamic, reduce innovation, and restrict consumer options.

As a result, the current setup could be reinforcing the position of already-powerful exchanges, rather than encouraging healthy competition.

Lawmakers delay key digital asset bill

The review of crypto-banking links comes alongside delays in broader legislative changes.

The Digital Asset Basic Act, which is expected to reshape the country’s crypto regulation, was initially scheduled for submission before the end of 2023.

However, on December 31, lawmakers pushed it back to 2026.

The bill proposes allowing the launch of stablecoins backed by the Korean won, as long as the issuing companies store their reserve assets with approved custodians such as banks.

The delay stems from disagreements over how to supervise stablecoin issuers and whether a new oversight body should pre-approve them.

The Financial Services Commission is also weighing how to allow both financial and non-financial firms to take part in this sector without compromising on safety.

The goal is to support innovation while maintaining strong regulatory safeguards.

The post South Korea may target fairer crypto market with banking rule changes: report appeared first on CoinJournal.

South Korean officials have unveiled a major international cryptocurrency crime ring involved in laundering approximately 150 billion won, equivalent to around $101.7 million, through an unauthorized foreign exchange scheme. 

The Korea Customs Service (KCS) announced on Monday that three Chinese nationals have been referred to prosecution for purported violations of the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act.

Large-Scale Cryptocurrency Laundering Scheme

Local media reports have pointed out that between September 2021 and June of last year, the suspects allegedly laundered their funds by allegedly manipulating both domestic and international cryptocurrency accounts in conjunction with Korean bank accounts. 

According to the KCS, the criminal activities were disguised as legitimate expenses, including cosmetic surgery fees for foreigners and educational costs for students studying abroad.

The accused ring utilized a complex operation to evade scrutiny from financial authorities. They reportedly bought crypto in multiple countries, transferred the assets to digital wallets in South Korea, converted them into Korean won, and funneled the money through various local bank accounts to further conceal their operations.

This action comes as South Korea is actively debating a new regulatory framework for its crypto market. Despite the growing popularity of digital assets as a common investment among local households, authorities have recently intensified their oversight on cryptocurrency transactions. 

South Korea Takes New Regulatory Steps

In a move towards greater regulation, the government revealed plans to broaden its anti-money laundering (AML) framework and emphasized the implementation of the Travel Rule—a compliance measure that requires sharing information on crypto transfers, effective even for transactions below 1 million won (approximately $680).

In addition to addressing money laundering concerns, the South Korean government outlined its 2026 Economic Growth Strategy, which includes plans to introduce Bitcoin (BTC) Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) this year. 

This announcement marks a significant policy shift, as cryptocurrency-based exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have been banned in South Korea since 2017. 

Despite reaffirming its position in 2024, post the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) approval of similar products, the South Korean government has now pointed to the success of crypto funds in the US and Hong Kong as influencing factors for this change.

FSC Fast-Tracks Stablecoin Legislation

The country’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) is also set to expedite the next phase of its digital asset legislation this quarter, aiming to establish a clear regulatory framework for stablecoins. 

While the Second Phase of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act has faced delays until early 2026 due to disagreements between the FSC and the Bank of Korea (BOK), major policy decisions have been made. 

As reported by Bitcoinist, these will include investor protection measures like no-fault liability for cryptocurrency operators and safeguards that separate bankruptcy risks for stablecoin issuers.

South Korea is also ready to lift its longstanding ban on institutional cryptocurrency trading, with anticipations of this initiative commencing later this year. Reports suggest that the FSC may impose limitations on corporate cryptocurrency investments, restricting them to 5% of a company’s equity capital.

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

Seoul investigators say they have disrupted a secret money-transfer network that moved roughly 150 billion won—about $102 million—into and out of South Korea using a mix of mobile payment apps and cryptocurrencies.

Reports say three people have been formally accused under the country’s foreign exchange laws after a probe that traced the scheme over several years.

How Money Moved Through Apps

According to the Korea Customs Service, the group collected money from customers using platforms like WeChat Pay and Alipay, then used those funds to buy virtual coins abroad.

Those coins were shifted into digital wallets in Korea and converted to Korean won through many bank accounts.

The pattern was basic and careful. Cash or mobile transfers arrived from overseas. Crypto purchases followed in multiple countries to avoid any one regulator seeing the full trail.

Finally, the funds were funneled into local accounts under different names. This took place over a long window, from September of 2021 until June of last year, investigators say.

Covering Tracks With Everyday Costs

According to reports, the ring hid the origin of money by dressing transfers up as ordinary expenses — payments for cosmetic surgery, fees for overseas study, and trade-related charges. Those labels made the flows look normal on paper and helped the group slip past routine checks.

Bank transfers were layered with small, seemingly legitimate payments. That made suspicious activity harder to spot until customs officers pieced together patterns across accounts and platforms.

At that point, the scope became clear: these were not isolated transfers but a linked series of transactions designed to wash large sums.

What Authorities Recovered

Investigators arrested and referred three Chinese nationals for prosecution, saying the suspects handled the bulk of the scheme’s operations.

Records show almost 150 billion won was moved in the period under review. Authorities have opened cases under the foreign exchange transactions law and are seeking to trace the remaining funds.

The case underlines how easy it can be for cross-border payment tools and crypto markets to be used together.

Regulators in Korea have been tightening rules for both mobile wallets and exchanges in recent months, and courts have allowed seizures of crypto assets in criminal probes. That legal backdrop helped the customs office act when the patterns surfaced.

Featured image from Dao Insights, chart from TradingView

Starting January 28, 2026, Google Play will stop allowing downloads and updates of overseas crypto exchange and wallet apps in South Korea unless those platforms prove they are registered with the country’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU).

Registration Proof Must Be Uploaded

According to Google’s new rule, developers listing crypto exchange or custodial wallet apps must upload evidence that their VASP registration has been accepted by the FIU through the developer console. This is not a technical tweak — it ties app distribution directly to local regulatory approval.

The result is immediate and practical. For Android users in Korea, apps from major overseas platforms will no longer be available for new installs or for updates through Google Play. Existing installations might keep working for a while, but they will not receive app updates or security fixes via the official store.

Local Crypto Platforms Lead Compliance

Based on reports, 27 domestic platforms have completed FIU registration, including well-known names such as Upbit and Bithumb. That leaves several major international exchanges without the needed paperwork, pushing them outside Google Play’s Korean marketplace.

For many users, this change will be felt quickly. If you rely on an overseas app to manage positions or move funds, the inability to download updates may make routine tasks harder and raise security risks. Web access to exchanges will remain an option, but it’s less convenient and sometimes less secure than using an official app.

Foreign exchanges face several demands to gain FIU acceptance. They often must set up a local legal entity, put in place anti-money-laundering systems, and obtain national information security certifications before their VASP filings are accepted. These steps can be costly and time consuming.

How The Market Might Shift

Some analysts say the move will push more trading volume toward Korea-registered firms. Others warn that it could encourage risky workarounds — such as downloading APKs from third-party sites or using VPNs — which expose users to fraud and malware. Reports say that upgrades to app-store rules follow earlier enforcement moves and aim to close gaps in oversight.

App availability will be tied to regulatory paperwork. If a platform shows FIU acceptance in Google’s console, its app can stay listed and updated. If not, the app will be removed or blocked from being updated in Korea’s Play Store.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

As South Korea intensifies its push for crypto regulation, lawmakers have advanced a bill to establish a legal framework for issuing and trading security token offerings (STOs) using distributed ledger technology (DLT).

Lawmakers Amend Framework For Tokenized Securities

On Thursday, South Korea’s National Assembly passed key amendments to the Capital Markets Act and the Electronic Securities Act, creating a legal framework for the issuance and distribution of tokenized securities.

According to an official government release, the revised rules define tokenized securities as a broad category that extends to both debt and equity products, and recognize them as legitimate financial instruments.

The amendments to the Electronic Securities Act will allow qualified issuers to launch tokenized securities using distributed ledger technology. Meanwhile, the Capital Markets Act changes will enable the products to be traded as investment contract securities on brokerages and other licensed intermediaries.

Notably, the existing Capital Markets Act prohibited the distribution through securities firms, deeming investment contract securities “unsuitable for distribution due to their non-standard characteristics.”

The changes are “expected to enhance accessibility to investments and improve the provision of investment information for these securities,” the official government release stated.

After legislative approval, the bill will be submitted to the State Council, followed by official presidential promulgation. Therefore, the legislation is expected to be enacted one year after being signed into law, tentatively in January 2027.

Moreover, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) is set to lead the implementation, forming a joint “Token Securities Council” with relevant agencies to ensure seamless preparatory work, including the development of supporting infrastructure and enhanced safeguards.

The consultation body will comprise the FSC, the Financial Supervisory Service, the Korea Securities Depository, the Financial Investment Association, industry participants, and experts.

South Korea’s Crypto Regulatory Push Continues

This major step follows South Korea’s efforts to develop and establish clear, comprehensive rules to regulate the local crypto industry. Last week, the government shared its 2026 Economic Growth Strategy, which included a plan to open its market to Bitcoin (BTC) Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) this year.

Crypto-based ETFs have been banned in South Korea since 2017. In 2024, the country’s regulator reaffirmed its stance after the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved the investment products. However, it has now cited the success of the US and Hong Kong’s crypto funds as a key factor for their shift.

The FSC will also accelerate the next phase of its digital asset legislation this quarter to establish a clear regulatory framework for stablecoins. As reported by Bitcoinist, South Korea’s Second Phase of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act was delayed until the start of 2026 due to an ongoing disagreement between the FSC and the Bank of Korea (BOK).

The financial authorities have been clashing for months over rules related to the issuance and distribution of stablecoins, disagreeing on the extent of banks’ role in the issuance of won-pegged tokens.

Nonetheless, the main policies of the crypto framework have been decided, set to include investor protection measures, such as no-fault liability for crypto asset operators and isolation of bankruptcy risks for stablecoin issuers.

Moreover, the country is lifting its long-standing ban on institutional crypto trading, which is anticipated to begin later this year. According to local reports, the FSC is considering a rule to limit corporate cryptocurrency investments at 5% of a company’s equity capital.

Under the latest proposal, eligible firms would be able to allocate up to 5% of equity capital per year to digital assets, limited to the top 20 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization. The final draft version could be released as early as January or February.

• Only VASP-registered platforms will stay available on the Play Store.
• Local exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb could gain more market share.
• Some traders may shift towards DeFi and non-custodial wallets.

South Korea’s crypto market is facing a major shift in how traders access overseas centralised exchanges.

Many foreign cryptocurrency exchange (CEX) apps are expected to become unavailable for download or unable to receive updates, through South Korea’s Google Play Store.

The change is linked to a Google policy update that ties app availability to local licensing requirements.

As a result, only platforms that meet South Korea’s regulatory standards will remain listed.

While the move does not fully block international trading services, it creates new barriers for users who rely on global exchanges through mobile apps.

Google Play tightens crypto app compliance rules

Google’s updated policy connects crypto app distribution to regulatory approval in each region.

In South Korea, that means crypto exchanges and wallet providers must hold valid local registration and follow strict compliance rules.

Only exchanges registered as Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) in South Korea can continue operating normally on Google Play.

This includes meeting tough anti-money laundering (AML) measures and security obligations required by the Korean financial authorities.

Since only a limited number of overseas platforms have secured VASP status in the country, most foreign exchanges will be blocked from new downloads and future app updates on the Play Store.

This approach effectively makes Android app access dependent on domestic licensing, even if the exchange continues offering services elsewhere.

Overseas platforms remain accessible but less convenient

South Korean users are not completely cut off from foreign exchanges.

They can still use overseas platforms through mobile web browsers or manually install apps using APK files.

However, browser-based trading tends to be less smooth for active users, with weaker performance and fewer app-level features.

APK sideloading also brings extra risks because it bypasses Google Play’s built-in security checks.

Users installing crypto apps outside official channels may face higher exposure to malware, phishing attacks, and compromised applications.

That creates added pressure on traders who want mobile access but also need a safe environment for managing funds.

Domestic exchanges could gain more market control

The policy change may also reshape South Korea’s crypto market structure by limiting competition from global platforms.

With fewer overseas apps available through Google Play, domestic exchanges such as Upbit and Bithumb could strengthen their position.

A larger share of trading activity may shift to local platforms simply because they remain easier to download, update, and use on Android devices.

This could give domestic exchanges more influence over trading volume, token listings, and fee structures.

Over time, reduced international competition could also affect how quickly new features and products reach Korean users, especially if access to offshore platforms becomes less practical for everyday trading.

DeFi alternatives may grow but scrutiny remains

With centralised mobile access restricted, some traders may look towards decentralised finance tools.

Decentralised exchanges and non-custodial wallets are not subject to the same Google Play licensing requirement, which could make them appealing to users seeking wider access to digital assets.

However, this does not remove the risks linked to regulation and tax compliance.

South Korean authorities have continued tightening reporting requirements and enforcement across the crypto sector.

That means users shifting into DeFi still face uncertainty, especially as policymakers focus more on transparency and monitoring.

How global crypto exchanges may adapt

Overseas exchanges may not leave the South Korean market completely.

Instead, some could explore ways to stay active by partnering with, or taking equity stakes in, Korean firms that already hold VASP licences.

A past example is Binance’s approach with Gopax, which signalled how global platforms may use local relationships to maintain a presence in tightly regulated markets.

Even so, any exchange that becomes compliant would still face restrictions on what it can offer.

Products like crypto derivatives remain prohibited under South Korean regulations, limiting the range of services available even under a licensed structure.

For South Korean users, the result may be a market where mobile access increasingly depends on domestic rules, pushing trading activity towards locally approved platforms.

The post South Korea limits foreign crypto exchange access as Google Play enforces licensing appeared first on CoinJournal.

• Companies would be limited to investing up to 5% of their equity capital.
• Only top market cap tokens on major regulated exchanges would be eligible.
• Stablecoin inclusion remains under regulatory discussion.

South Korea is preparing to reopen its digital asset market to corporate money, marking a major shift after nearly a decade of tight restrictions.

Financial regulators are updating long-standing guidelines that have barred companies from holding crypto assets since 2017, a period defined by concerns over money laundering and market instability.

The proposed changes would allow listed companies and professional investors to allocate a limited portion of their balance sheets to cryptocurrencies.

The move signals a recalibration of policy as Seoul seeks to strengthen its digital finance ecosystem while keeping risks contained through strict guardrails.

Corporate access returns

According to a report by the Financial Services Commission, legal entities will be permitted to invest up to 5% of their equity capital in crypto assets.

The information was reported by the Seoul Economic Daily.

Regulators are expected to release the final version of the guidelines in January or February.

Once in place, companies will be able to engage in virtual currency transactions for investment and financial purposes, ending a nine-year prohibition.

The FSC first outlined a phased easing of corporate crypto rules in February 2025 and shared the latest draft with its crypto working group on Jan. 6.

The approach reflects a gradual opening rather than a wholesale liberalisation.

Tight limits on assets

The planned framework places clear limits on where and how companies can invest.

Corporate purchases will be restricted to the top 20 crypto assets by market capitalisation, narrowing exposure to the most liquid and widely traded tokens.

Transactions will also be confined to South Korea’s five largest regulated exchanges, reinforcing oversight and compliance standards.

The inclusion of dollar-pegged stablecoins remains unresolved.

The report said regulators are still debating whether assets such as Tether’s USDT should be permitted under the new rules.

These conditions are designed to address the same financial crime risks that prompted the original ban, while recognising that the domestic market has matured since 2017.

Market impact expectations

The reopening of corporate access could unlock significant capital flows into crypto markets.

Seoul Economic Daily noted that the scale of potential investment runs into tens of trillions of won.

By way of illustration, the report pointed to internet giant Naver, which holds around 27 trillion won in equity capital.

Under the proposed cap, the company could theoretically deploy funds equivalent to roughly 10,000 Bitcoin.

Beyond direct market inflows, the change could alter corporate strategy.

Large South Korean firms have previously invested in digital assets overseas to avoid domestic restrictions.

Easing local rules may redirect that activity back home, supporting blockchain startups, digital asset treasuries, and related infrastructure.

Broader digital currency strategy

The corporate crypto shift sits alongside a wider push into digital currencies.

The government has outlined plans to execute 25% of national treasury transactions through a central bank digital currency by 2030 as part of its 2026 Economic Growth Strategy.

The government also plans to introduce a licensing regime for stablecoin issuers.

Under the proposal, issuers would need to maintain 100% reserve backing and provide legally guaranteed redemption rights for users.

Together, these measures suggest South Korea is seeking to integrate crypto assets, stablecoins, and a CBDC into a single regulatory framework rather than treating them as isolated experiments.

The post South Korea moves to reopen corporate crypto investing after long freeze appeared first on CoinJournal.

Welcome to Edition 8.24 of the Rocket Report! We're back from a restorative holiday, and there's a great deal Eric and I look forward to covering in 2026. You can get a taste of what we're expecting this year in this feature. Other storylines are also worth watching this year that didn't make the Top 20. Will SpaceX's Starship begin launching Starlink satellites? Will United Launch Alliance finally get its Vulcan rocket flying at a higher cadence? Will Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket be certified by the US Space Force? I'm looking forward to learning the answers to these questions, and more. As for what has already happened in 2026, it has been a slow start on the world's launch pads, with only a pair of SpaceX missions completed in the first week of the year. Only? Two launches in one week by any company would have been remarkable just a few years ago.

As always, we welcome reader submissions. If you don't want to miss an issue, please subscribe using the box below (the form will not appear on AMP-enabled versions of the site). Each report will include information on small-, medium-, and heavy-lift rockets, as well as a quick look ahead at the next three launches on the calendar.

New launch records set in 2025. The number of orbital launch attempts worldwide last year surpassed the record 2024 flight rate by 25 percent, with SpaceX and China accounting for the bulk of the launch activity, Aviation Week & Space Technology reports. Including near-orbital flight tests of SpaceX’s Starship-Super Heavy launch system, the number of orbital launch attempts worldwide reached 329 last year, an annual analysis of global launch and satellite activity by Jonathan’s Space Report shows. Of those 329 attempts, 321 reached orbit or marginal orbits. In addition to five Starship-Super Heavy launches, SpaceX launched 165 Falcon 9 rockets in 2025, surpassing its 2024 record of 134 Falcon 9 and two Falcon Heavy flights. No Falcon Heavy rockets flew in 2025. US providers, including Rocket Lab Electron orbital flights from its New Zealand spaceport, added another 30 orbital launches to the 2025 tally, solidifying the US as the world leader in space launch.

Read full article

Comments

© Liu Guoxing/VCG via Getty Images

Bitcoin Magazine

South Korea Preparing to Approve Spot Bitcoin ETFs in Crypto Policy Pivot

South Korea is reportedly preparing to open its financial markets to spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) this year, marking a shift in the country’s long-standing approach to digital assets as regulators accelerate work on a comprehensive new crypto law.

The plan was outlined in the government’s newly released 2026 Economic Growth Strategy, with the Financial Services Commission (FSC) taking the lead on implementation. 

If approved, spot bitcoin ETFs would become available to domestic investors for the first time, placing South Korea alongside markets such as the United States and Hong Kong, where similar products have already attracted billions of dollars in inflows.

Until now, Korea’s capital markets rules have not recognized cryptocurrencies like bitcoin or bitcoin ETFs as eligible underlying assets for ETFs, effectively blocking their launch. That stance is now changing as policymakers look to bring more crypto activity into regulated channels and reduce the flow of capital to offshore platforms.

The bitcoin ETF push is moving in parallel with a broader overhaul of digital asset regulation. The FSC is fast-tracking what it calls “Phase Two” digital asset legislation, a bill expected to focus heavily on stablecoins. 

According to government plans, the law will introduce a licensing system for stablecoin issuers, minimum capital requirements, and strict reserve rules requiring at least 100% backing of issued tokens. Issuers would also be required to guarantee user redemption rights.

Regulators say the framework is designed to prevent failures like the 2022 Terra-Luna collapse, which wiped out roughly $40 billion and had deep ties to South Korea. 

Alongside domestic rules, authorities are drafting standards for cross-border stablecoin transfers and transactions, reflecting growing use of digital tokens in trade and remittances. The effort is being coordinated between the FSC and the Ministry of Economy and Finance.

Global bitcoin ETF implementation

Officials point to global precedents as a key influence. Spot bitcoin ETFs in the U.S. and Hong Kong have seen strong demand, with major asset managers now treating the products as mainstream investment tools. 

Korea’s Financial Intelligence Unit estimates that more than 10 million people are eligible to trade digital assets domestically, underscoring the scale of potential demand.

Beyond private markets, blockchain is also moving into public finance. The government plans to digitize parts of the national treasury using so-called “deposit tokens,” a form of government-linked digital currency distinct from stablecoins, according to reports.

By 2030, up to 25% of treasury operations could be conducted via blockchain-based payments.

Pilot programs are already underway, and lawmakers are reviewing amendments to the Bank of Korea Act and the National Treasury Act to establish a legal foundation for these systems. 

Officials say the goal is faster settlement, lower administrative costs, and improved transparency.

This post South Korea Preparing to Approve Spot Bitcoin ETFs in Crypto Policy Pivot first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

• The proposal would let regulators suspend transactions before gains are laundered or moved.
• Authorities want to extend stock market-style enforcement tools to crypto trading.
• Recent actions by tax and financial regulators show tighter alignment with traditional finance rules.

South Korea’s financial regulators are reviewing whether to allow transactions to be suspended before suspected price manipulators can move or launder gains.

The idea is to act earlier in fast-moving crypto markets, where profits can be transferred quickly and become harder to trace.

If adopted, the change would mark a significant step in the country’s second phase of crypto regulation, which is expected to expand beyond user protection and address market abuse more directly, alongside work on stablecoin rules that are yet to be formally introduced.

Early intervention tools

The Financial Services Commission, or Financial Services Commission, is reviewing a payment suspension system that would allow regulators to block crypto transactions at an earlier stage.

Local outlet Newsis reported on Tuesday that the proposal would enable authorities to act before suspected manipulators cash out or launder potentially illicit profits.

Under the current framework, freezes often depend on court warrants.

That process can take time, giving suspects room to conceal funds. Regulators argue that crypto markets move faster than traditional assets, making delays more costly.

The proposed system would mirror tools already used in South Korea’s stock market, where accounts linked to suspected manipulation can be frozen before profits are realised.

Closing enforcement gaps

Market watchdogs have flagged specific tactics that can generate large but unstable gains in crypto trading.

These include front-running, automated wash trading, and placing high buy orders that inflate prices.

Such profits can vanish quickly once assets are moved off exchanges.

Regulators say crypto markets require stronger tools because assets can be transferred into private wallets with relative ease. This mobility, they argue, makes early intervention critical.

Lessons from capital markets

South Korea has already expanded its powers in traditional finance. Amendments to the Capital Markets Act, an Capital Markets Act, took effect in April 2025.

These changes allow account freezes for suspected unfair trading or illegal short sales.

According to reports, the FSC discussed extending similar measures to crypto during a closed-door meeting in November.

The talks took place while authorities were reviewing the first price manipulation case handled under the amended capital markets rules.

South Korea adds on regulatory tightening

The proposal builds on a series of measures highlighting South Korea’s effort to bring crypto regulation in line with standards applied in conventional financial markets.

On Oct. 10, the National Tax Service warned that cryptocurrency holdings kept in cold wallets remain subject to enforcement, noting its authority to conduct home searches and seize offline storage devices in tax evasion investigations.

On Dec. 7, the Financial Services Commission examined the idea of applying bank-style liability to crypto exchanges, which would require platforms to compensate users for losses caused by hacks or system failures even in the absence of proven negligence.

The post South Korea weighs preemptive crypto account freezes to curb market abuse appeared first on CoinJournal.

• Most breaches involved failures in customer due diligence and identity verification processes.
• The action coincides with reports of a potential majority acquisition by Mirae Asset.
• The case reinforces stricter regulatory expectations across South Korea’s crypto sector.

South Korea’s year-end move against Korbit marks a decisive moment for the country’s digital asset industry, as regulators signal that gaps in compliance will carry real consequences.

On December 31, the Financial Intelligence Unit closed an on-site investigation into one of the country’s longest-operating exchanges with a significant financial penalty and management-level sanctions.

The action, based on findings from an October inspection, places renewed focus on how exchanges verify users, manage risk, and expand services.

It also lands at a sensitive time for Korbit, underscoring how regulatory discipline is shaping the future of South Korea’s crypto market.

The FIU announced a 2.73 billion won ($1.88 million) fine after identifying nearly 22,000 breaches linked to anti-money laundering and customer verification obligations.

The violations were uncovered during an inspection conducted between October 16 and 29, 2024, with the results later reviewed by the Sanctions Review Committee.

Alongside the fine, the regulator issued an institutional warning and imposed individual accountability measures on senior executives.

Inspection findings

A large share of the violations stemmed from failures in customer due diligence.

The FIU found roughly 12,800 cases where identity checks were not properly conducted.

These included the acceptance of unclear or unverifiable identification documents, incomplete address information, and lapses in mandatory re-verification processes.

In several instances, users were allowed to continue trading even after their risk profiles increased, without additional checks being applied.

Such practices run counter to requirements that higher-risk customers be subject to enhanced scrutiny rather than standard monitoring.

The review also identified about 9,100 cases where customers were permitted to trade before identity verification was fully completed.

South Korean rules restrict transactions by unverified users, making these cases a direct breach of core compliance standards.

Accountability at the top

Beyond operational failures, the enforcement action extended responsibility to leadership.

The FIU issued an institutional warning to Korbit, while the exchange’s chief executive received a caution, and its reporting officer was reprimanded.

This approach reflects a broader regulatory emphasis on governance and internal controls, where accountability does not stop at automated systems or compliance teams.

Instead, senior management is expected to ensure that regulatory requirements are embedded across day-to-day operations and decision-making processes.

Overseas transfers and new services

Regulators also highlighted weaknesses beyond customer onboarding.

Inspectors flagged 19 virtual asset transfers involving three overseas virtual asset service providers that were not properly reported.

South Korean rules require exchanges to disclose dealings with foreign entities and restrict transactions with unregistered providers.

In addition, the FIU identified 655 cases where Korbit failed to carry out mandatory money laundering risk assessments before introducing new transaction types.

These included services linked to non-fungible tokens, an area of rapid growth that remains subject to the same compliance obligations as other digital asset products.

Timing and sector impact

The enforcement action comes just days after reports that Mirae Asset is said to be considering acquiring 92% of Korbit for up to 140 billion won ($97 million).

Korbit currently ranks as the fourth-largest exchange among South Korea’s six incorporated crypto platforms, placing it firmly within the regulator’s line of sight.

The FIU said full details of the sanctions will be disclosed after a minimum 10-day period for opinion submissions.

The post South Korea fines Korbit $1.8M over compliance failures appeared first on CoinJournal.

Korean Air confirms a major data leak affecting 30,000 staff members after the Cl0p gang targeted a catering partner. Learn what data was stolen and the airline’s response to secure its data.

• South Korea delays its Digital Asset Basic Law to 2026 amid disputes over stablecoin oversight authority.
• Lawmakers pause crypto legislation as regulators clash on who should control stablecoin reserves and enforcement.
• Regulatory uncertainty grows as Korea weighs investor protection against monetary control and innovation.

South Korea’s push to formalise crypto regulation has slowed again, with authorities confirming that the Digital Asset Basic Law will not be submitted until 2026.

The delay highlights deep divisions over how stablecoins should be supervised in one of Asia’s most active digital asset markets, even as crypto products become more tightly linked to the wider financial system.

The setback does not reflect a lack of interest in regulation.

Instead, it underlines how complex stablecoin oversight has become for policymakers, balancing innovation, financial stability, and monetary control.

With no agreement yet on who should hold ultimate authority, lawmakers have opted to pause rather than advance a bill with unresolved structural gaps.

Purpose of the proposed law

The Digital Asset Basic Law is intended to act as the backbone of South Korea’s crypto framework.

A core aim is investor protection, achieved by holding digital asset operators to stricter legal standards than before.

One of the most significant proposals is the introduction of no-fault liability, which would make operators responsible for user losses even if negligence cannot be proven.

Another pillar of the bill focuses on reducing systemic risk from stablecoins. The draft requires issuers to maintain reserves exceeding 100% of the circulating supply.

These reserves must be held at banks or approved institutions, with clear separation from the issuer’s own balance sheet.

The structure is designed to limit contagion risks if a stablecoin issuer fails.

Stablecoins and regulatory control

Stablecoins have emerged as the main fault line in the debate. While regulators broadly agree that stronger oversight is necessary, they remain split on who should enforce reserve rules and supervision.

The Financial Services Commission and the Bank of Korea have yet to align on how responsibilities should be divided.

These disagreements have complicated decisions around licensing, enforcement powers, and the treatment of reserve assets.

Rather than pushing through a compromised framework, authorities have delayed the bill to allow further coordination between financial regulators and monetary authorities.

Market uncertainty grows

The postponement has not triggered an immediate market reaction, but it adds another layer of uncertainty for crypto firms operating in South Korea.

Exchanges, payment providers, and stablecoin issuers continue to expand in an environment where long-term regulatory expectations remain unclear.

Uncertainty can have practical effects.

Firms may slow product launches, delay investment decisions, or consider shifting certain operations to jurisdictions with clearer rules.

For investors, the absence of a completed framework complicates assessments of risk and compliance.

Politics and monetary strategy

Political dynamics are also shaping the timeline. The ruling Democratic Party is now working to merge several lawmaker proposals into a revised digital asset bill.

At the same time, strategic concerns around monetary sovereignty are becoming more prominent.

President Lee Jae Myung has identified a Korean won-backed stablecoin as a national priority, arguing that it could counter the growing dominance of US dollar-linked stablecoins in global crypto markets.

These ambitions increase pressure on regulators to ensure that any framework aligns with broader monetary policy goals.

The delayed Digital Asset Basic Law is meant to represent the second phase of South Korea’s crypto regulation.

The first phase, already in force, targeted unfair trading practices.

The post South Korea delays digital asset law as stablecoin oversight divides regulators appeared first on CoinJournal.

Bitcoin Magazine

‘Pay 13 Bitcoin or We Blow It Up’: Hyundai Bomb Threat Shakes South Korean Offices

Hyundai Group evacuated employees from two major offices in Seoul today after receiving a bomb threat email demanding payment in bitcoin, police said. 

Authorities later confirmed the threat was a hoax, but the incident added to growing concern over a recent wave of extortion, crypto and non-crypto related, threats targeting South Korea’s largest companies.

According to local reports, a 112 emergency call was received at about 11:42 a.m. The caller relayed the contents of an email sent to Hyundai. The message said an explosive device would be detonated at Hyundai Group’s building in Yeonji-dong, Jongno-gu, at 11:30 a.m.

It added that a second bomb would be taken to Yangjae-dong, Seocho-gu, where Hyundai Motor Group maintains a major office.

The email demanded payment of 13 bitcoins. At current bitcoin prices, the amount is valued at about $1.1 million, or roughly 16.4 billion won.

According to reports, the caller said, “If you don’t give me 13 Bitcoins, I will blow up the Hyundai Group building at 11:30 a.m. and then take a bomb to Yangjae-dong and detonate it.”

Hyundai moved to evacuate staff from both locations. Police dispatched special forces units and bomb squads to conduct searches of the buildings. Officers sealed off parts of the surrounding areas while inspections were carried out. No explosive devices were found at either site.

After several hours, authorities concluded the scam threat lacked credibility. Operations at the buildings gradually returned to normal. Police said no payment was made and no injuries or property damage were reported.

South Korean corporate threats and bitcoin crime

The Hyundai incident comes amid a series of similar threats aimed at major South Korean corporations over the past several days. 

On Thursday, posts appeared on Kakao’s customer service bulletin board claiming explosives had been planted at Samsung Electronics’ headquarters in Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, as well as at Kakao’s Pangyo offices and Naver facilities. Those messages also included demands for large cash payments, per reports. 

On December 17, another bomb threat was posted through KT’s online subscription application system. The message claimed an explosive device had been installed at KT’s office in Bundang, Seongnam. 

Police responded by clearing the building and conducting a search. No explosives were discovered in that case either.

Authorities believe the incidents are part of a pattern of digital extortion attempts that rely on fear rather than using real devices or bombs. Investigations are ongoing to identify the individuals behind the threats and trace the origins of the messages, per the local police. 

This post ‘Pay 13 Bitcoin or We Blow It Up’: Hyundai Bomb Threat Shakes South Korean Offices first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

South Korean e-commerce giant Coupang faces intense scrutiny after CEO Park Dae-jun resigns over a data breach that exposed 33.7 million customer accounts. Read about the police raids, US lawsuit, and regulatory orders from PIPC.

Coupang confirms a data breach affecting 33.7 million users in South Korea, exposing names, contacts and order details. Investigation is ongoing.