The cryptocurrency market experienced another wave of liquidations on Friday, with Bitcoin (BTC) prices dipping below the critical support level of $90,000. This decline followed a brief rally that had seen its price rise approximately $3,000 above this threshold earlier in the week.

Crypto Market Faces $430 Million In Liquidations 

Data from CoinGlass reveals that nearly $430 million in liquidations occurred across the crypto market over the past 24 hours, predominantly affecting leveraged long positions, which accounted for about $350 million. 

During this period, Bitcoin underwent a 3.5% retracement, with its price settling at just above $89,120—a stark 29% below its all-time high of over $126,000 reached in October.

Market expert OxNobler recently highlighted the role of both retail and institutional investors in this downturn. In a post on social media platform X, OxNobler detailed the reason behind Bitcoin’s decline: significant sell-offs by major players. 

According to the analyst, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Binance, sold 4,000 BTC; U.S.-based Coinbase (COIN) liquidated 5,675 BTC; and traditional finance giant Fidelity sold 3,288 BTC. Additionally, market maker Wintermute offloaded 1,793 BTC. 

Notably, the analyst pointed out that Strategy, formerly MicroStrategy, which is the largest public company holder of Bitcoin with over 650,000 coins, has also sold over 3,820 coins in this same time frame.

The firm’s sell-off comes on the heels of speculation regarding Strategy’s potential to liquidate some of its holdings due to the substantial losses affecting its financial performance amid declining Bitcoin prices. 

When Strategy CEO Phong Le was questioned about the possibility of selling off Bitcoin, he acknowledged that while the firm’s former CEO, Michael Saylor, has consistently opposed selling, circumstances may change if the company’s stock trades below the net value of its Bitcoin holdings, which aligns with the recent actions taken by the firm.

Coinbase Analysts Predict December Recovery 

Interestingly, while these institutional sell-offs have contributed to the current market dip, Coinbase’s institutional division has projected a potential recovery for the crypto market in December, citing improving liquidity, a 92% probability of the Federal Reserve (Fed) cutting rates, and supportive macroeconomic conditions.

Analysts have pointed out several reasons for optimism, including the recovery of liquidity, the resilience of the “AI bubble,” and the attractiveness of short US dollar trades at current levels. 

However, OxNobler warned that the situation may not be so straightforward. Alongside the activities of major institutions, he noted that BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, had recently sold $130 million worth of Bitcoin and Ethereum (ETH).

Furthermore, Vitalik Buterin, one of Ethereum’s co-founders, seems to have resumed selling Ethereum, with millions of ETH being moved from the foundation’s wallet through Gnosis Safe.

Ultimately, OxNobler asserts that these institutional activities may have a hand in manipulating crypto prices and preventing them from climbing to higher levels and key resistance points. 

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com 

Prediction market observers have long warned that the business is ripe for insider trading.

And the arguments have already started.

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced on Thursday that spot crypto asset contracts will soon be available for trading on futures exchanges that are registered with the agency, aligning with the positive regulatory changes championed by President Donald Trump’s administration. 

Crypto Sprint Progress

The CFTC disclosed that this recent decision follows recommendations from the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets and insights gathered from the CFTC’s Crypto Sprint initiative, as well as collaborative efforts with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 

Acting CFTC Chairman Caroline Pham highlighted the importance of providing Americans with access to safe and regulated markets, stating, “Recent events on offshore exchanges have shown us how essential it is for Americans to have more choice and access to safe, regulated US markets.”

In addition to the introduction of spot trading, the Crypto Sprint initiative includes measures to enable tokenized collateral—such as stablecoins—within derivatives markets. 

The CFTC also plans to implement regulatory updates to facilitate the use of blockchain technology in various operational areas, including collateral, margin, clearing, settlement, reporting, and recordkeeping.

Historic Shift In CFTC’s Digital Asset Trading Move

Market expert MartyParty on social media stated that this latest move is an historic decision that will empower retail and institutional traders to buy, sell, and leverage crypto assets directly on CFTC-registered exchanges. MartyParty further noted:

It’s the culmination of years of regulatory groundwork, including a joint SEC-CFTC statement clarifying that existing laws already permit such trading on registered venues.

Pham remarked on the collaborative efforts of the administration, stating that President Trump’s leadership has fostered a comprehensive plan for the US to reclaim its status as a global leader in digital asset markets. As she noted, “The CFTC has a central role to play” in this initiative.

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com 

Now if that isn't late-stage capitalism, I don't know what is.

Leading banking institutions in traditional finance (TradFi) are reportedly partnering with US-based cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase (COIN) to explore pilots related to stablecoins, custody solutions, and trading options. 

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong announced this during his appearance at the New York Times Dealbook Summit on Wednesday, as reported by Bloomberg.

Coinbase CEO Cautions Banks On Crypto Resistance

Armstrong emphasized that leading financial institutions recognize this as an opportunity for growth. “The best banks are leaning into this as an opportunity,” he stated, although he refrained from naming any specific banks involved in these initiatives. 

During his speech, the executive also voiced his concerns about institutions that resist participating in the digital asset ecosystem. He asserted that those who oppose it will be left behind.

This sentiment aligns with remarks Armstrong made six months ago, where he predicted that eventually, every major bank would integrate cryptocurrency into their operations. 

He views this technology as a means to modernize the financial system, stating, “We can power a variety of things for them.” He noted that some banks are looking for custodial solutions, while others are interested in developing their own stablecoins.

COIN Shares Surge 5%

Adding weight to this discussion, Larry Fink, CEO of the world’s largest asset manager and crypto exchange-traded fund (ETF) issuer BlackRock, participated in the event alongside Armstrong. 

Fink, who previously voiced skepticism about cryptocurrencies, described Bitcoin (BTC) as a safe haven asset despite the cryptocurrency’s crash toward $83,000 on Monday. 

“You own Bitcoin because you’re frightened of your physical security. You own it because you’re frightened of your financial security,” he remarked. 

On the financial side, Coinbase’s stock performance reflects the positive sentiment in the cryptocurrency market amid recovering prices. Trading under the ticker COIN on the Nasdaq, Coinbase’s shares closed Wednesday at nearly $277, marking a 5% increase. 

This uplift coincides with broader gains in the cryptocurrency sector, notably led by the recent price performance of Ethereum (ETH), followed by Bitcoin, XRP, Binance Coin (BNB), and other notable tokens such as Solana (SOL), all of which have shown significant recoveries this week after a challenging month.

Featured image from Shutterstock, chart from TradingView.com

A major Australian crypto industry group has lodged a formal complaint with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, arguing that recent coverage of Bitcoin contained multiple errors and a biased tone.

According to the industry group, the broadcaster presented a one-sided view that overemphasized criminal usage and volatility while leaving out legitimate uses and data.

ABIB Calls For Corrections And Response Within 60 Days

Based on reports, the Australian Bitcoin Industry Body (ABIB) says it asked ABC to correct specific statements it considers false or misleading, and to publish clarifications. The complaint was made public on December 3, 2025, and ABIB posted about the filing on social media.

The complainants singled out passages that they say described Bitcoin largely as a tool for criminals and painted it as having little or no legitimate use. They pointed to sections that, in their view, ignored examples of Bitcoin being used for grid balancing and for humanitarian transfers.

The Australian Bitcoin Industry Body (ABIB) has lodged a formal complaint with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (@abcnews) regarding its recent article on Bitcoin.

The piece contained multiple factual errors, misleading claims, and one-sided framing that breach the ABC’s…

— Australian Bitcoin Industry Body (@AusBTCIndBody) December 2, 2025

ABC Coverage Focused On Money-Laundering Concerns

Reports have disclosed that ABC ran pieces discussing the changing role of Bitcoin in illicit flows, including a recent story that examined whether Bitcoin is losing ground to stablecoins such as Tether when used in money-laundering. That report drew particular ire from ABIB.

Industry Group Says Numbers And Context Were Missing

ABIB has argued that some context and figures were omitted from ABC’s coverage. One outlet summarized ABIB’s broader claim that media depiction was skewed at a time when adoption figures — sometimes cited at about 31% nationally in related coverage — should also be part of the public debate.

What Happens Next And Possible Escalation

If ABC does not satisfy ABIB’s complaint within 60 days, the matter could be escalated to Australia’s communications regulator for review. That regulator can investigate whether editorial standards were breached and recommend corrective action or other remedies.

Pushback From Media And Regulators Will Matter

Some newsrooms say robust coverage of risks is their duty. Others in the crypto sector argue that balanced reporting should include both harms and legitimate uses. The dispute highlights tensions as regulators, media and industry all jockey to shape public understanding while new rules for crypto take form.

Headlines And Policy Talk

Reports show ABC has recently run several finance and crypto pieces, including coverage of price moves and policy debates. One ABC item referenced US President Donald Trump in its discussion of political moves that have touched crypto policy. That inclusion was noted in pushback from industry groups.

ABIB Wants Clear Corrections, Not Just Apologies

According to ABIB, the aim is not to silence scrutiny but to ensure facts are correct for readers and for policymakers. The group says accurate public reporting matters because it can shape future regulation and public trust. Multiple news outlets have covered ABIB’s action and quoted its request that ABC publish corrections where errors are found.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Corporations are in a hurry to pivot to the blockchain, but they're turning up their nose at bitcoin.

Throughout the year, the crypto industry has undergone significant regulatory changes influenced by President Trump’s new policies, alongside a coalition of senators advocating for the adoption and growth of digital assets. 

However, tensions escalated when a group of Democratic senators began to challenge Trump’s policies, claiming that they reflect a significant conflict of interest, but this time, particularly concerning David Sacks, the White House’s AI and Crypto Czar.

White House Crypto Czar Denies Conflicts Of Interest

In a recent statement on social media site X (formerly Twitter), Sacks shared that five months ago, several reporters from The New York Times were assigned to investigate supposed conflicts of interest linked to his role. 

He described how the investigation persisted through numerous “fact checks,” during which they scrutinized various accusations against him. Despite presenting thorough rebuttals, Sacks noted that the published article only included fragments of their responses, while the foundation of the accusations remained largely speculative.

According to the White House’s Crypto Czar, the allegations ranged from a “fabricated dinner” with a notable tech CEO to unfounded claims of promising access to the President and exerting influence over defense contracts. He argued that each time an accusation was disproven, the Times simply shifted to another claim. 

Sacks expressed frustration that, in their pursuit of a “sensational story,” The New York Times overlooked the fact that he has no genuine conflicts of interest to uncover. He described the final article as a “nothing burger,” asserting that it merely pieced together anecdotes that do not substantiate its headline. 

To counter what he deemed a misrepresentation of the facts, Sacks ultimately hired a law firm specializing in defamation law, to assist in addressing these allegations. 

New Bills Could Dismantle Century-Old Banking Practices

Market expert Jack Sage later weighed in on these developments via social media, asserting that US bankers, including JPMorgan, are waging “TOTAL WAR” on Bitcoin. 

Sage pointed out several targets of this new onslaught, including Strategy (previously MicroStrategy), along with key figures such as Strike CEO Jack Mallers, and stablecoin issuer Tether (USDT). 

He indicated that David Sacks is now in the line of fire, characterizing this as a coordinated attack aimed at diminishing a crypto-friendly influence within Trump’s administration.

Sage suggested that the Trump administration seeks to leverage Bitcoin and stablecoins to challenge the banks’ “longstanding monopoly” over the money supply. 

He pointed to potential legislative initiatives such as the GENIUS Act, the upcoming CLARITY Act, and possibly the BITCOIN Act as transformative measures that could shift money creation away from traditional banks and the Federal Reserve (Fed).

These proposed bills, according to Sage, could dismantle the fractional reserve banking system that has existed for over a century. The response from traditional bankers and globalists, Sage noted, has been one of desperation as they confront a reality where they may lose control over monetary systems for the first time.

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com 

In a recent report, Republicans on the House Financial Services Committee unveiled alarming findings related to Operation Chokepoint 2.0, revealing that at least 30 crypto firms have been debanked over the past years. 

The investigation, which began in the 118th Congress, sought to uncover coordinated efforts by the Biden Administration to hinder digital asset businesses and individuals from accessing essential financial services.

Biden Administration’s Actions Against Crypto

The report details how regulators under the Biden Administration employed “vague rules” and excessive discretion to discourage banks from serving clients in the digital asset space. 

The Republicans further asserted that these regulators pressured financial institutions to distance themselves from digital asset clients through informal guidance, enforcement actions, and a lack of clear regulations, removing them from the financial system.

Chairman Hill commented on the implications of this approach, stating, “Targeting Americans over their political views erodes trust in the financial system and undermines the core freedoms our nation was founded on.” 

However, Hill voiced confidence in repairing the damage done by the Biden administration, citing the current era of advancement for digital assets under President Trump, who has already signed one crypto bill—the GENIUS Act—and may soon sign the CLARITY Act.

The report also highlighted that “informal communications,” such as interagency statements and interpretive letters, have specifically been used to discourage banks and other financial entities from working with digital asset firms.

Regulatory Bodies Criticized For Inaction

Key points raised in the report by Republicans include a failure by the Biden Administration to create a clear crypto regulatory regime, which has enabled federal financial regulators to effectively stifle innovation and limit activity within the sector. 

Rather than fostering a supportive environment for digital asset projects, Republicans claim that the administration’s approach leaned toward enforcement-based regulation, which further complicated matters for crypto firms. 

The report underscored the characterization of the digital asset ecosystem by the Biden Administration as prone to volatility and risk, particularly citing concerns over compliance with anti-money laundering (AML). However, Republicans argued that these concerns do not justify the aggressive tactics employed against the industry.

The report also highlighted the roles of key regulators such as the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). 

These entities, according to the report, failed to establish a coherent regulatory framework for digital assets and have resorted to enforcement actions against companies engaged in this market.

Subcommittee Chair Meuser remarked, “This report documents how Obama-era practices were revived and expanded under President Biden—through pause letters, informal pressure campaigns, and regulation by enforcement that forced U.S. companies offshore.” 

He called attention to the leadership of individuals like President Trump, Secretary Bessent, Vice Chair Bowman, Comptroller Gould, and Acting Chair Hill, who are credited with restoring fairness and clarity in bank supervision. 

While the industry has seen major shifts under President Trump’s administration, Meuser stressed the need for Congress to codify protections against similar actions in the future, to prevent any resurgence of Operation Chokepoint.

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com 

Conflicts are good, actually.

Centralized mixing tools for obscuring crypto transactions are the latest target of authorities.

Trust the dusty old rating agency with the spotty history, or trust the brash young crypto company?

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) has reaffirmed its commitment against cryptocurrency trading after confirming a resurgence in market speculation. The Chinese apex bank is nudging several government institutions to strengthen their crackdown on business and financial activities involving virtual currencies and curb related illegal operations.

Stablecoins Yet To Meet AML Requirements, China Says

In 2021, China issued a ban on all cryptocurrency trading and mining activities, citing a potential threat to the nation’s financial stability and energy control system. Prior to this policy, the Asian giant had been one of the fastest-growing crypto hubs with the highest mining activity in the world. Four years later, the PBOC has reiterated this hostile stance against virtual assets despite a significant increase in cryptocurrency adoption and regulation globally. This development came on November 28, 2025, in a meeting centered on “The Coordination Mechanism for Combating Cryptocurrency Trading Speculation.”

Notably, this policy discussion involved representatives from 13 government departments and agencies, including the Ministry of Justice, the State Financial Regulatory Commission, and the China Securities Regulatory Commission, among others. While the PBOC acknowledged the steadfast implementation of the government’s “Notice on Further Preventing and Handling Risks of Virtual Currency Trading and Speculation” issued in 2021, they also highlighted an increase in trading speculations and related illicit activities, requiring new methods for risk prevention and control. 

In particular, the meeting reaffirmed that no form of cryptocurrencies qualifies as a legal tender, including stablecoins, which they claim still fail to satisfy certain regulatory requirements.

The statement read:

Virtual currency-related business activities constitute illegal financial activities. Stablecoins are a form of virtual currency, and currently cannot effectively meet requirements for customer identification and anti-money laundering, posing a risk of being used for illegal activities such as money laundering, fundraising fraud, and illegal cross-border fund transfers.

Moving forward, the People’s Bank of China admonished all concerned government institutions to bolster regulatory actions in enforcing the existing prohibitive policy on cryptocurrencies and all related criminal actions, in line with President Xi Jinping’s Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era. 

The directive read:

All units should deepen coordination and cooperation, improve regulatory policies and legal basis, focus on key links such as information flow and capital flow, strengthen information sharing, further enhance monitoring capabilities, severely crack down on illegal and criminal activities, protect the property safety of the people, and maintain the stability of the economic and financial order.

Crypto Market Overview 

At the time of writing, the total market crypto cap stands at $3.06, reflecting a 0.12% gain in the last day. Meanwhile, total trading volume is down 32.95% to $81.28 billion.

Dark days for the bros.

"Stop this boring insider trading," one X user complained.

It's cheaper than ever to turn antisocial behavior into big bucks.

Innocent pen testing mistake or premeditated attack?

A move that should have simplified trading is fraught with drama.

And there's an additional Trump family connection.