Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Before yesterdayMain stream

Why Gold Ownership Still Feels Exclusive And How Tokenization Changes That

20 January 2026 at 08:05

The secret that’s unlocking gold for everyone

Remember the first time you thought about buying gold? Maybe you imagined walking into a vault, handling heavy bars, or worrying about where to safely store them. For most people worldwide, owning physical gold has always felt like something reserved for the wealthy or those with access to specialized facilities. The barriers seemed too high, the risks too great, and the process too complicated.

But what if I told you that technology is completely changing this centuries-old story?

Gold Tokenization
How Tokenization Changes That

The Traditional Gold Ownership Problem

Let’s be honest: physical gold ownership has never been truly accessible to everyone. You need significant capital to buy meaningful amounts, secure storage facilities that cost money, insurance policies that add up, and constant worry about theft or loss. Even if you manage to acquire gold, selling it quickly when you need cash involves finding buyers, verifying authenticity, and dealing with dealers who take their cut.

These aren’t small inconveniences. They’re genuine barriers that have kept millions of people from participating in one of history’s most reliable stores of value.

Enter Gold Tokenization: Breaking Down the Walls

This is where gold tokenization transforms everything you thought you knew about gold investment.

Imagine owning a fraction of a gold bar, stored securely in a vault, without ever touching it. Imagine buying or selling that gold with a few clicks on your phone, 24/7, without visiting a dealer. Imagine having complete transparency about your holdings through blockchain technology that can’t be manipulated.

That’s exactly what gold tokenization service platforms are making possible today.

Gold tokenization converts physical gold into digital tokens on a blockchain. Each token represents actual gold stored in certified vaults, giving you real ownership without the traditional headaches. Think of it as owning shares in gold, except these digital certificates are secured by cutting-edge technology that makes fraud nearly impossible.

How Modern Gold Investment Models Work

The benefits of tokenized gold over physical gold become crystal clear when you see how it actually works:

You can start with minimal amounts (whether it’s $10 equivalent in your local currency), buying fractional ownership that would be impossible with physical bars. Your gold-backed tokens live in a digital wallet, accessible anytime, anywhere. No storage fees are eating into your returns, no insurance premiums to maintain, and no anxiety about security.

When you need liquidity, you simply sell your tokens on digital platforms, often within minutes. Compare that to calling multiple dealers, scheduling appointments, and waiting days for payments with physical gold. Blockchain solutions for gold investment have created a transparent system where every transaction is recorded permanently. You can verify your gold’s existence, its purity, and even track its custody history. This level of transparency was unthinkable in traditional gold markets.

Real Benefits That Matter to You

Let me break down what this actually means for your investment strategy:

Accessibility is no longer a barrier: Whether you’re a student saving small amounts monthly or an investor diversifying your portfolio, gold ownership is now within reach regardless of where you live. The exclusivity that kept gold in the hands of the privileged is disappearing.

Liquidity becomes your advantage: Need emergency funds? Sell your gold-backed tokens instantly instead of scrambling to find buyers for physical gold. The digital marketplace operates continuously, giving you control when you need it most.

Diversification gets easier: You can spread small investments across different gold products, storage locations, or even combine gold with other tokenized assets, creating a balanced portfolio that was once only available to institutional investors.

Security improves dramatically: No more worrying about break-ins or natural disasters destroying your physical holdings. Your gold sits in professional vaults while your digital proof of ownership is secured by blockchain technology.

The Future of Gold Investment with Tokenization

We’re witnessing the early stages of a fundamental shift. The future of gold investment with tokenization isn’t just about making things easier; it’s about democratizing wealth preservation. Traditional financial institutions worldwide are taking notice. Banks and investment firms across different regions are launching their own gold tokenization services. Regulations are evolving globally to protect investors while encouraging innovation. The infrastructure is being built for a world where physical and digital gold ownership coexist seamlessly.

Young investors who grew up with cryptocurrency find tokenized gold familiar yet stable. It combines the security of precious metals with the convenience of digital assets. For older generations, it removes the physical burden while maintaining the fundamental value they’ve always trusted in gold.

Your Next Step Toward Accessible Gold Ownership

The exclusivity of gold ownership is ending. Technology has opened doors that were previously locked to most people. Whether you’re looking to preserve wealth, hedge against economic uncertainty, or simply diversify your investments, tokenized gold offers a practical path forward. The question isn’t whether you can afford to own gold anymore. The question is: are you ready to embrace this new way of investing?

Gold tokenization isn’t replacing traditional gold; it’s expanding access to it. The barriers that once kept you out are crumbling. The vaults that seemed unreachable are now as close as your smartphone.

To understand the complete landscape of this revolutionary approach and make informed decisions about your investment future, read the full gold tokenization guide and discover how you can start your journey toward accessible, secure gold ownership today.


Why Gold Ownership Still Feels Exclusive And How Tokenization Changes That was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Institutions Are Positioning Ahead Of US Crypto Market Structure Shift – Details

15 January 2026 at 01:00

The cryptocurrency market is showing signs of short-term relief as Bitcoin and major altcoins attempt to stabilize after weeks of sustained selling pressure. Prices have rebounded modestly across the board, easing some of the recent bearish momentum. However, sentiment remains fragile. Many analysts argue that this move fits the profile of a relief rally rather than the start of a durable trend reversal, pointing to still-weak market structure and unresolved macro and regulatory risks.

Against this backdrop, a draft market structure bill released by the US Senate is drawing significant attention.  The proposed framework represents a potential structural shift in how crypto assets are treated within the US financial system.

The bill aims to clearly differentiate which crypto assets fall under the definition of commodities and which qualify as securities, while assigning regulatory oversight accordingly. Until now, the US regulatory approach has largely relied on enforcement actions, creating uncertainty for investors, developers, and institutions alike. By outlining classification criteria in advance, the proposal seeks to reduce ambiguity and provide a cleaner operating environment.

As markets digest this information, the focus is shifting from headline-driven volatility toward longer-term structural implications. Whether this regulatory clarity translates into sustained confidence remains an open question.

Regulatory Clarity Signals a Shift

A report from XWIN Research Japan highlights a critical nuance in the latest US market structure proposal: fully decentralized networks and DeFi protocols are not treated as traditional financial intermediaries. Developers, validators, and node operators are not automatically classified as regulated entities, signaling a formal recognition of decentralization as a core structural attribute rather than a loophole to be closed.

This distinction is meaningful, as it reduces legal uncertainty for open-source contributors and preserves the permissionless nature of decentralized infrastructure.

In contrast, centralized entities face a more clearly defined regulatory perimeter. Exchanges, brokers, and custodians are expected to comply with stricter rules on registration, asset segregation, and disclosure. Rather than targeting innovation, these requirements appear designed to professionalize market infrastructure and align centralized crypto businesses with existing financial standards.

Within this framework, Bitcoin, Ethereum, stablecoins, and spot ETFs are implicitly assumed to remain integrated into the US financial system, reinforcing their status as legitimate financial instruments.

On-chain data already reflects this transition. Metrics from CryptoQuant show that near the $90,000 Bitcoin level, retail activity remains muted while mid- and large-sized spot orders dominate. This pattern suggests neither speculative excess nor panic-driven exits, but measured positioning by larger investors.

Bitcoin Spot Average Order Size

Taken together, these signals imply a market gradually shifting from reactive, headline-driven behavior toward a more structure-driven phase. Regulatory clarity may not spark immediate price moves, but it is already influencing how capital positions itself across the crypto landscape.

Total Crypto Market Cap Enters Consolidation Phase

The total cryptocurrency market capitalization chart shows a market in consolidation after an aggressive multi-quarter expansion. Following the strong advance from late 2023 into mid-2025, total market cap peaked near the $3.8–$4.0 trillion zone before entering a corrective phase. Since then, price action has transitioned into a broad range, with higher volatility compressing into a more orderly structure.

Crypto Market Cap tests key demand level | Source: TOTAL chart on TradingView

Currently, the total market cap is hovering around the $3.2 trillion level, which aligns with a key former resistance zone that has now acted as support multiple times. The weekly structure suggests a cooling phase rather than a breakdown. Price remains above the rising 200-week moving average, which continues to slope upward and reinforces the idea that the primary market trend is still constructive.

Shorter-term moving averages have flattened, reflecting indecision and reduced momentum after the earlier impulsive move. Volume has declined from peak levels, indicating that aggressive distribution pressure has eased, but strong expansion demand has not yet returned. This combination is typical of mid-cycle consolidation rather than terminal weakness.

From a structural perspective, the market is digesting prior gains while maintaining a higher-low framework relative to previous cycles. A sustained hold above the $3.0 trillion region keeps the broader bullish structure intact. However, failure to defend this zone would expose the market to deeper retracements toward long-term trend support.

Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com 

Filing: Human rights proposals win more than 25% of votes at Microsoft shareholder meeting

9 December 2025 at 18:43
Microsoft’s logo on the company’s Redmond campus. (GeekWire File Photo)

Two human rights proposals at Microsoft’s annual shareholder meeting drew support from more than a quarter of voting shares — far more than any other outside proposals this year.

The results, disclosed Monday in a regulatory filing, come amid broader scrutiny of the company’s business dealings in geopolitical hotspots. The proposals followed a summer of criticism and protests over the use of Microsoft technology by the Israeli military. 

The filing shows the vote totals for six outside shareholder proposals that were considered at the Dec. 5 meeting. Microsoft had announced shortly after the meeting that shareholders rejected all outside proposals, but the numbers had not previously been disclosed.

According to the filing, two proposals received outsized support: 

  • Proposal 8, filed by an individual shareholder, called for a report on Microsoft’s data center expansion in Saudi Arabia and nations with similar human rights records. It asked the company to evaluate the risk that its technology could be used for state surveillance or repression, and received more than 27% support.
  • Proposal 9, seeking an assessment of Microsoft’s human rights due diligence efforts, won more than 26% of votes. The measure called for Microsoft to assess the effectiveness of its processes in preventing customer misuse of its AI and cloud products in ways that violate human rights or international humanitarian law.

Proposal 9 had received support from proxy advisor Institutional Shareholder Services — a rare endorsement for a first-time filing. Proxy advisor Glass Lewis recommended against it.

The measure attracted 58 co-filers and sparked opposing campaigns. JLens, an investment advisor affiliated with the Anti-Defamation League, said Proposal 9 was aligned with the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, which pressures companies to cut ties with Israel. Ekō, an advocacy group that backed the proposal, said the vote demonstrated growing concerns about Microsoft’s contracts with the Israeli military.

In September, Microsoft cut off an Israeli military intelligence unit’s access to some Azure services after finding evidence supporting a Guardian report in August that the technology was being used for surveillance of Palestinian civilians.

Microsoft’s board recommended shareholders vote against all six outside proposals at the Dec. 5 annual meeting. Here’s how the other four proposals fared: 

  • Proposals 5 and 6, focused on censorship risks from European security partnerships and AI content moderation, drew less than 1% support.
  • Proposal 7, which asked for more transparency and oversight on how Microsoft uses customer data to train and operate its AI systems, topped 13% support.
  • Proposal 10, calling for a report on climate and transition risks tied to AI and machine‑learning tools used by oil and gas companies, received 8.75%.

See Microsoft’s proxy statement and our earlier coverage for more information.

❌
❌