Normal view
-
TechCrunch
- How the classic anime ‘Ghost in the Shell’ predicted the future of cybersecurity 30 years ago
When Silicon Thinks Faster Than Flesh
When Silicon Thinks Faster Than Flesh

They say the chips think faster now, a trillion choices in a breath, broadband wide as highways, while hands that built the world sit idle in the waiting room of obsolescence.
Who works when work is just a memory uploaded to machines that never sleep, never ask for raises, never dream?
They’ll give us income, universal, a basic promise, monthly bread, but whose hand controls the faucet? Whose finger on the valve decides if we eat or beg?
The government, they say, will tax the titans, route the river from their vaults into our cups. Trust us, they say. We’ll be fair, they say.
But I’ve seen power and power doesn’t share unless someone is watching, unless someone can say no.
So here’s the question that should keep us awake: Who decides the numbers? Who writes the code? Who checks the checkers?
We need our people at that table, not later, not when we’re already hungry, not when dependence has made us quiet, but now, while we still have leverage, while we can still demand to see the blueprints of our own tomorrow.

A citizen council, elected, accountable, with power to audit, to veto, to verify that justice isn’t just a promise whispered down from towers but a right we enforce ourselves.
The future is being written in boardrooms we can’t enter, in algorithms we can’t read.
and if we don’t demand a seat at that table now, we’ll inherit a world where someone else decides if we deserve to live.
2140 The Rise of Bitcoin Citadels Chronicles Genesis
When Silicon Thinks Faster Than Flesh was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
Earth — No Contact Zone

Earth — No Contact Zone
So they are still fighting — the humans.
Still drawing borders, building walls, claiming lands as if the sky were theirs to divide.
They are not united. Not yet.
And until they are, we will not go to them.
(In a classroom on a distant alien world)
Student:
Ma’am, why haven’t we contacted Earth yet?
We have the technology. We could speak to them — today, even now. So why don’t we?
Teacher:
That’s a good question. One we ask often.
But before I answer, I want you to think. Really think.
Let’s look at their history — the humans.
Long ago, they hunted.
They killed to survive, to eat, to rule.
They were more violent then — wild and afraid.
But over time, they settled. Built homes. Grew crops.
And slowly… they harmed less. Just a little less.
Civilizations rose. Then empires.
And with them, came war — endless wars over territory, over pride.
Then came their modern age. What did that bring?
Serfdom. Slavery. Racism. Greed.
Some of those poisons still linger in their world even now.
Yes, they advanced — in tools, in science, in machines.
But tell me:
Did their souls keep pace with their inventions?
As they built satellites, they still built prisons.
As they mapped the stars, they still judged by skin.
So, in our terms, they are not yet developed.
Because true development is not measured in machines —
but in mercy.
Once the people of Earth learn to accept one another,
once they choose peace not as a treaty but as a truth,
then they will be ready.
Then we will speak to them.
Until then…
they are too busy surviving their own chaos.
We are beyond that now.
We gave up the things that destroy.
Hatred. War. Ego.
And the irony?
They think we would attack them.

(Far away, among alien officials)
High-ranking official:
Earth has been declared a no-contact zone.
No ships may enter. No probes. No whispers.
The planet is to be left untouched.
Observed, but never interfered with.
They are… an ecosystem.
Nothing more.
Just like the forests they fail to protect —
they, too, must be left to grow or wither on their own.
Let’s see how long it takes.
Let’s see when they finally look up, not in fear…
but in peace.
(Back on Earth…)
A television broadcast crackles:
“The Amazon Rainforest — home to countless species —
has been declared a protected zone.
All activities harming its balance are now banned.
No hunting. No poaching.
Left alone by humans, the forest may finally breathe.
The ecosystem may heal.”
If only they knew —
they, too, are a forest still learning to grow.

Earth — No Contact Zone was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
Out of the Woods, by Neikehienuo Mepfhu-o
Published 2022 | Fiction
A boy caught between the real and an ‘alternate reality’, ‘Out of the Woods’ by Neikehienuo Mepfhu-o takes a look at the struggles that mental health illnesses bring with them – for the person and their immediate family members.
During a recent trip to Nagaland, I decided to pick up a book or two written by local authors, and ‘Out of the Woods’ by Neikehienuo Mepfhu-o was one among them. One of the key reasons to pick up the book was the book blurb – there was no tiptoeing around the subject of the book, no promises of happy endings and salvations, no hiding the fact that this could be (and is) a painful read.
Out of the Woods is a book that may act as a trigger for individuals who have dealt with mental health issues – themselves or as support for families. Because Neikehienuo Mepfhu-o captures the emotional turmoil not only of the afflicted but the immediate family too. It took me a good while to read through the book as it brought back memories from the days when I was diagnosed with anxiety and depression, the battle that ensued and the struggles that my immediate family, especially my parents faced in the interim.
The Crux
Neikehienuo Mepfhu-o’s ‘Out of the Woods’ is the story of a family struggling to cope with the trials and tribulations that village life brings with it while also grappling with the trauma of caring for a growing teen who is struggling to find his place in the real world that collides with the alternate world he lives in. The book traverses through the life of this family that is caught in an endless, harsh loop of loss, pain, trauma, the struggle to find the cause’ to the boy’s ‘behaviour’ and the penultimate discovery of the road to healing.
The Highs & Lows
One of the highlights of the books is the strong hold the writer has on the language (which could be contributed to the fact that she is an educator based in Kohima and has won an award for a previous book). The author uses simple language as effectively as a painter uses a paintbrush – her words transport you from the eerily peaceful and happy alternate world the boy lives in while effectively drawing out a picture of the home and world the boy inhabits with his family. She uses words to explain to the readers the thoughts and emotions that rush through the boy’s mind, in vivid contrast to the helpless anguish and frustration of the family that is tied together by their love for him. What is disturbing – and true – is that it is this very love and resultant uncertainty that govern their lives and threaten to break them apart. The book is a deep dive into the mind of a young boy dealing with an undiagnosed mental health disorder.
I keep writing ‘the boy’ because that is what he is through the book – ‘the boy’ – and that, in my opinion, works to create an awareness that the teenager and the family could be anyone, in any part of the world.
The relatives, the villagers, the pastor and other sources that claim they can help the child act as a commentary on the society’s struggles to accept the reality of mental health issues. This would, perhaps, be more pronounced in pockets that continue to remain relatively disconnected from the rest of the woke and allegedly more aware world.
So, does this mean Out of the Woods is without its follies? The very strength of the author works against the book – the words. By the time you reach the halfway mark, you may be hit by the ‘this is repetitive’ thought because it is for several pages. Thankfully, there is a shift from the normal to the parallel reality which shocks the reader out of the lull.
Another aspect that did not work for me is the end – the journey from the intervention, to seeking medical help and the manner in which the doctor explains the situation as also the boy’s return to ‘normalcy’ is not fulfilling from the reader point of view. Personally, tighter editing could have definitely helped the cause of this book.
However, for the sheer gumption required to write an entire novel that depicts the emotional trauma and exhaustion of mental health, Neikehienuo Mepfhu-o’s Out of the Woods is definitely a book I’d suggest you pick up.
Out of the Woods, by Neikehienuo Mepfhu-o
Published 2022 | Fiction
A boy caught between the real and an ‘alternate reality’, ‘Out of the Woods’ by Neikehienuo Mepfhu-o takes a look at the struggles that mental health illnesses bring with them – for the person and their immediate family members.
During a recent trip to Nagaland, I decided to pick up a book or two written by local authors, and ‘Out of the Woods’ by Neikehienuo Mepfhu-o was one among them. One of the key reasons to pick up the book was the book blurb – there was no tiptoeing around the subject of the book, no promises of happy endings and salvations, no hiding the fact that this could be (and is) a painful read.
Out of the Woods is a book that may act as a trigger for individuals who have dealt with mental health issues – themselves or as support for families. Because Neikehienuo Mepfhu-o captures the emotional turmoil not only of the afflicted but the immediate family too. It took me a good while to read through the book as it brought back memories from the days when I was diagnosed with anxiety and depression, the battle that ensued and the struggles that my immediate family, especially my parents faced in the interim.
The Crux
Neikehienuo Mepfhu-o’s ‘Out of the Woods’ is the story of a family struggling to cope with the trials and tribulations that village life brings with it while also grappling with the trauma of caring for a growing teen who is struggling to find his place in the real world that collides with the alternate world he lives in. The book traverses through the life of this family that is caught in an endless, harsh loop of loss, pain, trauma, the struggle to find the cause’ to the boy’s ‘behaviour’ and the penultimate discovery of the road to healing.
The Highs & Lows
One of the highlights of the books is the strong hold the writer has on the language (which could be contributed to the fact that she is an educator based in Kohima and has won an award for a previous book). The author uses simple language as effectively as a painter uses a paintbrush – her words transport you from the eerily peaceful and happy alternate world the boy lives in while effectively drawing out a picture of the home and world the boy inhabits with his family. She uses words to explain to the readers the thoughts and emotions that rush through the boy’s mind, in vivid contrast to the helpless anguish and frustration of the family that is tied together by their love for him. What is disturbing – and true – is that it is this very love and resultant uncertainty that govern their lives and threaten to break them apart. The book is a deep dive into the mind of a young boy dealing with an undiagnosed mental health disorder.
I keep writing ‘the boy’ because that is what he is through the book – ‘the boy’ – and that, in my opinion, works to create an awareness that the teenager and the family could be anyone, in any part of the world.
The relatives, the villagers, the pastor and other sources that claim they can help the child act as a commentary on the society’s struggles to accept the reality of mental health issues. This would, perhaps, be more pronounced in pockets that continue to remain relatively disconnected from the rest of the woke and allegedly more aware world.
So, does this mean Out of the Woods is without its follies? The very strength of the author works against the book – the words. By the time you reach the halfway mark, you may be hit by the ‘this is repetitive’ thought because it is for several pages. Thankfully, there is a shift from the normal to the parallel reality which shocks the reader out of the lull.
Another aspect that did not work for me is the end – the journey from the intervention, to seeking medical help and the manner in which the doctor explains the situation as also the boy’s return to ‘normalcy’ is not fulfilling from the reader point of view. Personally, tighter editing could have definitely helped the cause of this book.
However, for the sheer gumption required to write an entire novel that depicts the emotional trauma and exhaustion of mental health, Neikehienuo Mepfhu-o’s Out of the Woods is definitely a book I’d suggest you pick up.

My New Old Keyboard
There are lots of different types of keyboards out there: high profile, low profile, feather sensitivity or heavy hitters, curved keys, uniform height, etc. Personally, I like the loud, heavy keyboards with high profiles (keys stand up) and no gap between the keys. This way, I can feel the keys without looking down and tell the difference between brushing a finger over a key and actually typing a letter. (If you can't hear my typing during a video call, then the keyboard isn't loud enough.)
Most of my keyboards have had black or gray keys. A few years ago (2022), I bought a "large print keyboard" for the fun of it. It had big keys, a high profile, and a loud click. The selling point for me were the huge letters and the bright yellow color.
Unfortunately, it didn't last very long. Within a few months, the black paint on the letters began to vanish. 'A', 'S', and 'D' were the first to go, followed by 'X', 'C', and 'V' (for cut, copy, and paste). Fast forward to today (3 years later):
The shift-key on the right doesn't have a black scratch on it. That's where I've literally worn through the yellow plastic. It's not that I don't use the letters Q, P, H, or U; they just seem to have lasted longer. (I joked with my colleagues that the backspace and delete keys are in pristine conditions -- because I don't make mistakes.)
The New Problems
When a keyboard gets worn down this much, I typically go out and buy a new cheap keyboard. Given that I wear through keyboards every few years, I have trouble justifying $100 for a fancy replacement. Give me a $10 cheap-plastic keyboard every few years and I'll be happy. (Seriously, I splurged $23 on the yellow keyboard. It lasted 3 years, so that's less than $8 a year. Before the yellow keyboard, I had a cheap $12 one that also lasted 3 years, so it cost $4 per year to use.)Over the last 40+ years, I've seen the quality degrade as vendors cut costs by using cheaper materials. The old heavy IBM PC keyboards were built like tanks -- they never broke down, even if the letters might fade a little. The PS/2 keyboards (circa 1987-1997) had more plastic and occasionally the key switches would degrade before the print on the keys wore off. (I have one old PS/2 keyboard that types "jn" every time you press "n". Beneath each key is a switch. This problem might be a dirty contact, but I don't think I can open the keyboard up without breaking it.) Today's USB keyboards are extremely lightweight but also cheaply constructed; letters fade fast and the plastic on the keys might wear out. Today's keyboards are not built to last.
Making matters worse, most keyboards are made overseas. Between the (insane) tariffs and shipping delays, I don't want to wait. And with the current economic instability, I'd rather not spend the money, even on a new cheap keyboard, if I absolutely don't have to.
What's Old is New
Fortunately, I have a huge box of old keyboards in the storage area. It includes everything from modern USB to old PS/2 and the super old 5-pin DIN connectors. (I think the oldest keyboard in the box is from the early 1980s.) Some computer manufactures would bundle a keyboard with every new computer. Other times I'd pick up a keyboard in a box of auction junk. (Often, I'd want something else at the auction, but the box being sold also contained keyboards.) Any keyboard I don't like, don't need, don't use, or is broken for some reason gets put in the big box of keyboards.Today I went digging through the box, looking for something with the right profile and feel.
- The first good one was a 105 keys with a PS/2 connector. (Most US keyboards have 101 keys.) My computer doesn't have a PS/2 port, but in the "big box of old keyboards" was an old PS2-to-USB adapter! That's the nice thing about keyboards -- they all use the same communication protocol. As long as you have the right adapter to plug it in, the computer will recognize it and it will just work.
This new old keyboard was manufactured in 1992 by a company that no longer exists. (I looked them up. Today, there's a company with the same name, but they were founded in 2001.) And yet, the keyboard still works fine. Well, sort of. All of the standard "101" keys still work fine, but the custom "power", "sleep", "wake", and "Fn" buttons don't register when I press them. (Maybe I need to tweak the keyboard mapping? Probably not worth the effort.) Since it's not perfect, I went back to the box of keyboards. - The next keyboard had a bunch of sticky keys that push down but pop up slowly. (From an auction, someone probably spilled a drink on the keyboard a few decades ago.)
- The original "Sun" keyboard looks like a PS/2 but doesn't work; it's probably not really communicating with PS/2. (When possible, stay away from proprietary connectors.)
- I found one of my old keyboards that I used with my OS/2 workstation. After plugging it in, I remembered why I replaced it: the space bar was broken. Many space bars have a metal wire that ensures that the key goes down evenly. The wire fits into some plastic clips underneath. After years of use, those clips had broken off.
There's just one problem. It predates the appearance of the "Super" key ("Windows" or "Command" key on keyboards, next to the shift buttons). On my desk are two computers that share the same keyboard and mouse: a Linux box and a Mac. I use some software called 'Synergy' to link the desktops. As the mouse goes off the side of one monitor, it appears on the next computer's screen. Linux doesn't use the Windows/Command key, but Macs do. This missing key is going to be a problem... Fortunately, Synergy permits me to remap 'alt' to the Mac 'Command' key. (Problem solved.)
Macros
On my desktop computer, I have a few macros mapped to certain keys. For example:- I almost never use the function keys. I've mapped "F9" to toggle my mouse size. If I press it, then the cursor becomes larger -- which is great for video chats and sharing my screen -- the big icons help people to see my mouse. If I press F9 again, then the mouse returns to the normal small size.
- I've remapped the "Pause/Break" button. (In 40+ years, I've never used that button to pause/break anything.) Instead, it turns on/off the audio recorder on my telephone. With the push of a button, I can record any call to an MP3. (I use it to record spam phone calls; I wrote about the script back in 2014.) If the phone rings from an unknown caller, I press the button to record and then answer the phone. (And yes, recording calls is legal in Colorado.)
- The lower-right corner of most 101-key keyboards has a "Menu" button. I've remapped that to mute/unmute my speakers. (Sometimes I can't immediately find the app that is making sounds and I just want the computer to shut up while I take a call. Tap one key for mute.) However, this HP keyboard predates the "Windows" and "Menu" buttons, so I'll need to remap the mute/unmute to a different key. (Maybe F8; I never use that key!)
Old Learning Curve
I think the biggest hurdle for this new old keyboard will be my own adjusting to the physical key spacing. Cheap keyboards and older keyboards often use different key sizes. With this keyboard, the spacing is a little wider than the yellow keyboard. It also has a different sensitivity. (Not bad, just different.) Then again, if I decide I don't like it, then I can always go back to digging through my big box of old keyboards.Technological Divergence
Unfortunately, the media providers have divided up the available shows. Some things are only available on Netflix, others are only on Hulu, Amazon, other a dozen other smaller providers. If you want a bigger selection, then you need to join to more services. By December, I had decided to subscribe to another streaming service, just to get more variety.
I heard that Disney+ had the Star Wars franchise. I checked their requirements and they explicitly say that they support my Roku model. However, as soon as I tried to enable it, it said that it wasn't supported on my device. A quick search in their forums identified the problem: Disney lied when they said they support it. Specifically, they have two tiers: with ads (cheap) and without ads (expensive). The cheaper Disney+ plan, which I had signed up for, is not supported on Roku. It turns out that Disney+ is having some kind of dispute with Roku and decided to not support their low-end service on Roku's platform.
I immediately canceled the Disney+ service, but they still tried to charge me for the month. A quick chat with their online service person got me my full refund.
This experience just capped off the end of a year with far too much technological divergence.
Video
I'm old enough to remember when the "Apple computer" was new and IBM made these super heavy "PS/2" desktop machines. Back then, if you wanted video then you could either use a TV or one of the newer video monitors. The video monitors had a wide range of protocols: HGC, CGA, EGA, VGA, EVGA, etc. You needed a video card and a monitor that supported the same protocol. There was a little backwards compatibility, but it wasn't consistent.Every new video card needed new, custom video drivers. Even different video cards from the same vendors were often incompatible. If the diver wasn't supported by the operating system or the monitor didn't support the video card, then you were out of luck.
Fortunately, most of this insanity was resolved with consistent standards. Today, if you have a monitor and a computer, then you can just plug them in and they work. It's been this way for a few decades.
This same divergence-to-convergence scenario happened with printers. In the early days, you had serial vs parallel, then came network and USB interfaces. You also used to need specific drivers for accessing your printer. But today, most printers speak standard protocols. If your specific printer model isn't in the list, then there's probably a similar (or generic) model that will work just as well. Most of the time, you can just plug it in and start using it.
However, over the last year I began to play with some AI software. I've experimented with everything from artificial text generation (GPT-2, GPT-3, etc.) to computer-generated imagery, voice replacement, and even some deep fake software. With all of these technologies, training the AI really requires a GPU. Unfortunately, this is where I found a resurgence of technological divergence.
It turns out that the GPU interfaces are all non-standard. No AI library supports every GPU model. For example, PyTorch (a very common AI framework) is based on Torch. The github repo for Torch hasn't been updated in 5 years, is failing the nightly builds, and isn't actively supported. And yet, a ton of AI-based github projects still use PyTorch.
The AI community seems to mainly be divided between nVidia and non-nVidia hardware. But sticking to one hardware vendor doesn't ensure compatibility. Newer nVidia cards are released often and the newest ones typically lack community support for at least a year. I've found some projects that just won't work with my (newer) two-year-old nVidia GTX-3060. If you want to work on any AI projects these days, you need to make sure that your specific combination of hardware, drivers, libraries, and software are compatible.
Mobile
This technological divergence seems to be everywhere. This year, I spent some time playing with sensors on mobile devices. Most mobile phones and tablets have GPS, motion sensors, etc. (Last July, I was trying to determine if any of Apple's proprietary metadata fields recorded sensor information.)There are plenty of JavaScript functions for accessing device information from within the web browser. However, to describe them as "inconsistent" would be an understatement. For example:
- My Android 11 tablet has the latest versions of mobile Firefox and mobile Chrome installed. Both can read my GPS sensor. However, that's pretty much the end of any consistency. Firefox can see the 'compass', but not the motion sensor. Chrome can see the motion sensor, but not the compass. In contrast, a standalone application (not JavaScript in a web browser) can see both without a problem. The conclusion? Different software on the same platform will work differently.
- While Firefox and Chrome on the same android behave differently, the exact same versions of mobile Firefox and mobile Chrome mostly work the same way on my iPhone. However, Firefox can just access the sensors, while Chrome needs a human to click on a permissions button first. Even if I granted indefinite permission, it still requires permission each time. The conclusion here? The same software on different platforms will work differently.
- The current iteration of mobile Chrome is version 108 (November). Version 105 (August) saw different sensors and had different prompting compared to 108. Chrome version 101 saw more sensors on the same device than Chrome 105. Thus, there is not even consistency between versions that are only months apart.
Networking
Even networking, which has been stable for decades, is seeing a technological divergence. For example, most online connections rely of TLS for network security. SSL, TLS 1.0, and TLS 1.1 were deprecated a few years ago due to having too many weak ciphers. (Deprecated is a technical term for "no longer recommended and losing support soon".) On March 31, 2022, TLS 1.1 was no longer supported by Google, Microsoft, Apple, and Mozilla. Online devices really should be using TLS 1.3, but TLS 1.2 is still supported.These days, the only time my web sites see anything using SSL or TLS 1.0 is when it comes from attack bots. They're looking for anyone who is still running old software. (It's a good indication that you're vulnerable due to not patching.) I still see a few users with old browsers (usually only on mobile devices) who are using TLS 1.1, but even TLS 1.1 is mostly an indication that the TLS client is a hostile bot or automated script.
For the last few days, DEF CON founder Jeff Moss has been reporting on a problem with his mastodon server. Jeff had only enabled TLS 1.3 (current TLS version that was revised in 2018) but the main mastodon hub seems to only use TLS 1.2 (circa 2008). This meant that Jeff couldn't register his defcon.social mastodon service at the hub. (His solution was to enable both TLS 1.2 and 1.3 support.)
While less severe, I'm also seeing a migration from HTTP/1.1 to HTTP/2.0, but the migration is far from complete. At the current adoption rate, I'm expecting to see HTTP/1.1 for another decade. (In contrast, any clients claiming to be running HTTP/0.9 or HTTP/1.0 are bots and should be blocked on sight.)
On the positive side, I'm seeing more services cracking down on abusive network behavior, like scans and attacks. I used to see attacks coming from all over the internet. But these days, they are often limited to specific subnets or service providers. This makes blocking malicious activity much simpler; I have no problem blacklisting network ranges, or entire domains, when the service provider primarily hosts malicious clients. While blacklisting parts of the internet is introducing a technological divergence (you can't access everything from everywhere), it's great for mitigating attacks.
With video cards and printers, there used to be a hassle with installing drivers, but eventually the dust settled and compatible protocols were defined. Today, we seem to be re-entering a state of vendor-specific functionality, competing feature interfaces, and incompatible protocols. Unfortunately, this type of thing usually takes years to resolve. Here's hoping that it happens in 2023, even though it will probably be closer to 2026.
And on a personal note, since I still want to watch sci-fi while walking on the treadmill, I recently added Paramount Plus to my streaming options. They have the Star Trek and Terminator franchises, and it works on my Roku. With a new selection of stuff to watch, I can now boldly go into 2023!