In this episode, we explore Amazon Ring’s newly introduced Familiar Faces feature that utilizes AI for facial recognition. We discuss the convenience of identifying familiar people at your doorstep, the privacy concerns it raises, and the legal implications surrounding biometric data. Learn about how this feature works, potential inaccuracies, and privacy laws in certain U.S. […]

The post Ring’s Facial Recognition Feature: Convenience or Privacy Nightmare? appeared first on Shared Security Podcast.

The post Ring’s Facial Recognition Feature: Convenience or Privacy Nightmare? appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Welcome back, my cyberwarriors!

This article was first published at Hackers-Arise in April 2022, just 2 months after the Russians invaded in Ukraine.

At the request of the IT Army of Ukraine, we were asked to help the war efforts by hacking a large number of IP cameras within Ukrainian territory. In this way, we can watch and surveil the Russian army in those areas. Should they commit further atrocities (we certainly pray they will not), we should be able to capture that on video and use it in the International Criminal Court. At the very least, we hope the word goes out to the Russian soldiers that we are watching and that constrains their brutality.

In a collaborative effort, our team (you all) has been able to hack into a very large number. We have nearly 500, and we are working on the remainder.

Here is a sampling of some of the cameras we now own for surveillance in Russia and Ukraine.

To learn more about hacking IP cameras, become a Subscriber Pro and attend our IP Camera Hacking training.

Welcome back, my aspiring hackers!

Nowadays, we often discuss the importance of protecting our systems from malware and sophisticated attacks. We install antivirus software, configure firewalls, and maintain vigilant security practices. But what happens when the attack vector isn’t a malicious file or a network exploit, but rather a legitimate browser feature you’ve been trusting?

This is precisely the threat posed by a new command-and-control platform called Matrix Push C2. This browser-native, fileless framework leverages push notifications, fake alerts, and link redirects to target victims. The entire attack occurs through your web browser, without first infecting your system through traditional means.

In this article, we will explore the architecture of browser-based attacks and investigate how Matrix Push C2 weaponizes it. Let’s get rolling!

The Anatomy of a Browser-Based Attack

Matrix Push C2 abuses the web push notification system, a legitimate browser feature that websites use to send updates and alerts to users who have opted in. Attackers first trick users into allowing browser notifications through social engineering on malicious or compromised websites.

Once a user subscribes to the attacker’s notifications, the attacker can push out fake error messages or security alerts at will that look scarily real. These messages appear as if they are from the operating system or trusted software, complete with official-sounding titles and icons.

The fake alerts might warn about suspicious logins to your accounts, claim that your browser needs an urgent security update, or suggest that your system has been compromised and requires immediate action. Each notification includes a convenient “Verify” or “Update” button that, when clicked, takes the victim to a bogus site controlled by the attackers. This site might be a phishing page designed to steal credentials, or it might attempt to trick you into downloading actual malware onto your system. Because this whole interaction is happening through the browser’s notification system, no traditional malware file needs to be present on the system initially. It’s a fileless technique that operates entirely within the trusted confines of your web browser.

Inside the Attacker’s Command Center

Matrix Push C2 is offered as a malware-as-a-service kit to other threat actors, sold directly through crimeware channels, typically via Telegram and cybercrime forums. The pricing structure follows a tiered subscription model that makes it accessible to criminals at various levels of sophistication. According to BlackFog company, the Matrix Push C2 costs approximately $150 for one month, $405 for three months, $765 for six months, and $1,500 for a full year. Payments are accepted in cryptocurrency, and buyers communicate directly with the operator for access.

From the attacker’s perspective, the interface is intuitive. The campaign dashboard displays metrics like total clients, delivery success rates, and notification interaction statistics.

As soon as a browser is enlisted by accepting the push notification subscription, it reports data back to the command-and-control server.

Matrix Push C2 can detect the presence of browser extensions, including cryptocurrency wallets like MetaMask, identify the device type and operating system, and track user interactions with notifications. Essentially, as soon as the victim permits the notifications, the attacker gains a telemetry feed from that browser session.

Social Engineering at Scale

The core of the attack is social engineering, and Matrix Push C2 comes loaded with configurable templates to maximize the credibility of its fake messages. Attackers can easily theme their phishing notifications and landing pages to impersonate well-known companies and services. The platform includes pre-built templates for brands such as MetaMask, Netflix, Cloudflare, PayPal, and TikTok, each designed to look like a legitimate notification or security page from those providers.

Because these notifications appear in the official notification area of the device, users may assume their own system or applications generated the alert.

Defending Against Browser-Based Command and Control

As cyberwarriors, we must adapt our defensive strategies to account for this new attack vector. The first line of defense is user education and awareness. Users need to understand that browser notification permission requests should be treated with the same skepticism as requests to download and run executable files. Just because a website asks for notification permissions doesn’t mean you should grant them. In fact, most legitimate websites function perfectly well without push notifications, and the feature is often more of an annoyance than a benefit. If you believe that your team needs to update their skills for current and upcoming threats, consider our recently published Security Awareness and Risk Management training.

Beyond user awareness, technical controls can help mitigate this threat. Browser policies in enterprise environments can be configured to block notification permissions by default or to whitelist only approved sites. Network security tools can monitor for connections to known malicious notification services or suspicious URL shortening domains.

Summary

The fileless, cross-platform nature of this attack makes it particularly dangerous and difficult to detect using traditional security tools. However, by combining user awareness, proper browser configuration, and anti-data exfiltration technology, we can defend against this threat.

In this article, we briefly explored how Matrix Push C2 operates, and it’s a first step in protecting yourself and your organization from this emerging attack vector.

Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!

In our previous article, we examined the architecture of MCP and explained how to get started with it. Hundreds of MCP servers have been built for different services and tasks—some are dedicated to cybersecurity activities such as reverse engineering or reconnaissance. Those servers are impressive, and we’ll explore several of them in depth here at Hackers‑Arise.

However, before we start “playing” with other people’s MCP servers, I believe we should first develop our own. Building a server ourselves lets us see exactly what’s happening under the hood.

For that reason, in this article, we’ll develop an MCP server for analyzing security logs. Let’s get rolling!

Step #1: Fire Up Your Kali

In this tutorial, I will be using the Gemini CLI with MCP on Kali Linux. You can install Gemini using the following command:

kali> sudo npm install -g @google/gemini-cli

Now, we should have a working AI assistant, but it doesn’t yet have access to any of our security tools.

Step #2: Create a Security Operations Directory Structure

Before we start configuring MCP servers, let’s set up a proper directory structure for our security operations. This keeps everything organized and makes it easier to manage permissions and access controls.

Create a dedicated directory for security analysis work in your home directory.

kali> mkdir -p ~/security-ops/{logs,reports,malware-samples,artifacts}

This creates a security-ops directory with subdirectories for logs, analysis reports, malware samples, and other security artifacts.

Let’s also create a directory to store any custom MCP server configurations we build.

kali> mkdir -p ~/security-ops/mcp-servers

For testing purposes, let’s create some sample log files we can analyze. In a real environment, you’d be analyzing actual security logs from your infrastructure.

Firstly, let’s create a sample web application firewall log.

kali> vim ~/security-ops/logs/waf-access.log

This sample log contains various types of suspicious activity, including SQL injection attempts, directory traversal, authentication failures, and XSS attempts. We’ll use this to demonstrate MCP’s log analysis capabilities.

Let’s also create a sample authentication log.

kali> vim ~/security-ops/logs/auth.log

Now we have some realistic security data to work with. Let’s configure MCP to give Gemini controlled access to these files.

Step #3: Configure MCP Server for Filesystem Access

The MCP configuration file lives at ~/.gemini/settings.json. This JSON file tells Gemini CLI which MCP servers are available and how to connect to them. Let’s create our first MCP server configuration for secure filesystem access.

Check if the .gemini directory exists, and create it if it doesn’t.

kali> mkdir ~/.gemini

Now edit the settings.json file. We’ll start with a basic filesystem MCP server configuration.

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "security-filesystem": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem",
        "/home/YOURUSERNAME/security-ops"
      ],
      "env": {}
    }
  }
}

This sets up a filesystem MCP server with restricted access to only our security-ops directory. First, it uses npx to run the MCP server, which means it will automatically download and execute the official filesystem server from the Model Context Protocol project. The -y flag tells npx to proceed without prompting. The server-filesystem package is the official MCP server for file operations. Second, and most critically, we’re explicitly restricting access to only the /home/kali/security-ops directory. The filesystem server will refuse to access any files outside this directory tree, even if Gemini tries to. This is defense in depth, ensuring the AI cannot accidentally or maliciously access sensitive system files.

Now, let’s verify that the MCP configuration is valid and the server can connect. Start Gemini CLI again.

kali> gemini

After running, we can see that 1 MCP server is in use and Gemini is running in the required directory.

Now, use the /mcp command to list configured MCP servers.

/mcp list

You should see output showing the security-filesystem server with a “ready” status. If you see “disconnected” or an error, double-check your settings.json file for typos and check if you have nodejs, npm, and npx installed.

Now let’s test the filesystem access by asking Gemini to read one of our security logs. This demonstrates that MCP is working and Gemini can access files through the configured server.

> Read the file ~/security-ops/logs/waf-access.log and tell me what security events are present

Pretty clear summary. The key thing to understand here is that Gemini itself doesn’t have direct filesystem access. It’s asking the MCP server to read the file on its behalf, and the MCP server enforces the security policy we configured.

Step #4: Analyzing Security Logs with Gemini and MCP

Now that we have MCP configured for filesystem access, let’s do some real security analysis. Let’s start by asking Gemini to perform a comprehensive analysis of the web application firewall log we created earlier.

> Analyze ~/security-ops/logs/waf-access.log for attack patterns. For each suspicious event, identify the attack type, the source IP, and assess the severity. Then provide recommendations for defensive measures.

The analysis might take a few seconds as Gemini processes the entire log file. When it completes, you’ll get a detailed breakdown of the security events along with recommendations like implementing rate limiting for the attacking IPs, ensuring your WAF rules are properly configured to block these attack patterns, and investigating whether any of these attacks succeeded.

Now let’s analyze the authentication log to identify potential brute force attacks.

> Read ~/security-ops/logs/auth.log and identify any brute force authentication attempts. Report the attacking IP, number of attempts, timing patterns, and whether the attack was successful.

Let’s do something more advanced. We can ask Gemini to correlate events across multiple log files to identify coordinated attack patterns.

> Compare the events in ~/security-ops/logs/waf-access.log and ~/security-ops/logs/auth.log. Do any IP addresses appear in both logs? If so, describe the attack campaign and create a timeline of events.

The AI generated a formatted timeline of the attack showing the progression from SSH attacks to web application attacks, demonstrating how the attacker switched tactics after the initial approach failed.

Summary

MCP, combined with Gemini’s AI capabilities, serves as a powerful force multiplier. It enables us to automate routine analysis tasks, instantly correlate data from multiple sources, leverage AI for pattern recognition and threat hunting, and retain full transparency and control over the entire process.

In this tutorial, we configured an MCP server for file system access and tested it using sample logs.

Keep returning, aspiring hackers, as we continue to explore MCP and the application of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity.

The post Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Cybersecurity: Creating a Custom MCP Server For Log Analysis first appeared on Hackers Arise.

Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!

In today’s highly targeted environment, a well-designed Security Operations Center (SOC) isn’t just an advantage – it’s essential for a business’s survival. In addition to that, the job market has far more jobs on the blue team than the red team. Getting into a SOC is often touted as one of the more accessible entry points into cybersecurity.

This article will delve into some of the key concepts of SOC.

Step #1: Purpose and Components

The core purpose of a Security Operations Center is to detect, analyze, and respond to cyber threats in real time, thereby protecting an organization’s assets, data, and reputation. To achieve this, a SOC continuously monitors logs, alerts, and telemetry from networks, endpoints, and applications, maintaining constant situational awareness.

Detection involves identifying four key security concerns.

Vulnerabilities are weaknesses in software or operating systems that attackers can exploit beyond their authorized permissions. For example, the SOC might find Windows computers needing patches for published vulnerabilities. While not strictly the SOC’s responsibility, unfixed vulnerabilities impact company-wide security.

Unauthorized activity occurs when attackers use compromised credentials to access company systems. Quick detection is important before damage occurs, using clues like geographic location to identify suspicious logins.

Policy violations happen when users break security rules designed to protect the company and ensure compliance. These violations vary by organization but might include downloading pirated media or transmitting confidential files insecurely.

Intrusions involve unauthorized access to systems and networks, such as attackers exploiting web applications or users getting infected through malicious websites.
Once incidents are detected, the SOC supports the incident response process by minimizing impact and conducting root cause analysis alongside the incident response team.

Step #2: Building a Baseline

Before you can detect threats, you must first understand what “normal” looks like in your environment. This is the foundation upon which all SOC operations are built.

Your baseline should include detailed documentation of:

Network Architecture: Map out all network segments, VLANs, DMZs, and trust boundaries. Understanding how data flows through your network is critical for detecting lateral movement and unauthorized access attempts. Document which systems communicate with each other, what protocols they use, and what ports are typically open.

Normal Traffic Patterns: Establish what typical network traffic looks like during different times of day, days of the week, and during special events like month-end processing or quarterly reporting. This includes bandwidth utilization, connection counts, DNS queries, and external communications.

User Behavior Baselines: Document normal user activities, including login times, typical applications accessed, data transfer volumes, and geographic locations. For example, if your accounting department typically logs in between 8 AM and 6 PM local time, a login at 3 AM should trigger an investigation. Similarly, if a user who normally accesses 5-10 files per day suddenly downloads 5,000 files, that’s a deviation worth investigating.

System Performance Metrics: Establish normal CPU usage, memory consumption, disk I/O, and process execution patterns for critical systems. Cryptocurrency miners, rootkits, and other malware often create performance anomalies that stand out when compared against baselines.

Step #3: The Role of People

Despite increasing automation, human oversight remains essential in SOC operations. Security solutions generate numerous alerts that create significant noise. Without human intervention, teams waste time and resources investigating irrelevant issues.

The SOC team operates through a tiered analyst structure with supporting roles.

Level 1 Analysts serve as first responders, performing basic alert triage to determine if detections are genuinely harmful and reporting findings through proper channels. When detections require deeper investigation, Level 2 Analysts correlate data from multiple sources to conduct thorough analysis. Level 3 Analysts are experienced professionals who proactively hunt for threat indicators and lead incident response activities, including containment, eradication, and recovery of critical severity incidents escalated from lower tiers.

Supporting these analysts are Security Engineers who deploy and configure the security solutions the team relies on. Detection Engineers develop the security rules and logic that enable these solutions to identify harmful activities, though Level 2 and 3 Analysts sometimes handle this responsibility. The SOC Manager oversees team processes, provides operational support, and maintains communication with the organization’s CISO regarding security posture and team efforts.

Step # 4: The Detection-to-Response Pipeline

When a potential security incident is detected, every second counts. Your SOC needs clearly defined processes for triaging, investigating, and responding to alerts.

This pipeline typically follows these stages:

Alert Triage: Not all alerts are created equal. Your SOC analysts must quickly determine which alerts represent genuine threats versus false positives. Implement alert enrichment that automatically adds context—such as asset criticality, user risk scores, and threat intelligence—to help analysts prioritize their work. Use a tiered priority system (P1-Critical, P2-High, P3-Medium, P4-Low) based on potential business impact.

Investigation and Analysis: Once an alert is prioritized, analysts must investigate to determine the scope and nature of the incident. This requires access to multiple data sources, forensic tools, and the ability to correlate events across time and systems. Document your investigation procedures for common scenarios (phishing, malware infection, unauthorized access) to ensure consistent and thorough analysis. Every investigation should answer the five Ws: what happened? where it occurred? When did it take place? Why did it happen? And how did it unfold?

Containment and Eradication: When you confirm a security incident, your first priority is containment to prevent further damage. This might involve isolating infected systems, disabling compromised accounts, or blocking malicious network traffic.

Recovery and Remediation: After eradicating the threat, safely restore affected systems to normal operation. This may involve rebuilding compromised systems from clean backups, rotating credentials, patching vulnerabilities, and implementing additional security controls.

Post-Incident Review: Every significant incident should conclude with a lessons-learned session. What went well? What could be improved? Were our playbooks accurate? Did we have the right tools and access? Use these insights to update your procedures, improve your detection capabilities, and refine your security controls.

Step #5: Technology

At a minimum, a functional SOC needs several essential technologies working together:

SIEM Platform: The central nervous system of your SOC that aggregates, correlates, and analyzes security events from across your environment. Popular options include Splunk, for which we offer a dedicated course.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR): Provides deep visibility into endpoint activities, detects suspicious behavior, and enables remote investigation and response.

Firewall: A firewall functions purely for network security and acts as a barrier between your internal and external networks (such as the Internet). It monitors incoming and outgoing network traffic and filters any unauthorized traffic.

Besides those core platforms, other security solutions such as antivirus, SOAR, and various niche tools each play distinct roles. Each organization selects technology that matches its specific requirements, so no two SOCs are exactly alike.

Summary

A Security Operations Center (SOC) protects organizations from cyber threats. It watches networks, computers, and applications to find problems like security weaknesses, unauthorized access, rule violations, and intrusions.

A good SOC needs three things: understanding what normal activity looks like, having a skilled team with clear roles, and following a structured process to handle threats. The team works in levels – starting with basic alert checking, then deeper investigation, and finally threat response and recovery.

If you want to get a deep understanding of SIEM and SOC workflow, consider our SOC Analyst Lvl 1 course.

The post Security Operations Center (SOC):Getting Started with SOC first appeared on Hackers Arise.

Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!

We’ve come to treat AI assistants like ChatGPT and Copilot as knowledgeable partners. We ask questions, and they provide answers, often with a reassuring sense of authority. We trust them. But what if that very trust is a backdoor for attackers?

This isn’t a theoretical threat. At the DEF CON security conference, offensive security engineer Tobias Diehl delivered a startling presentation revealing how he could “poison the wells” of AI. He demonstrated that attackers don’t need to hack complex systems to spread malicious code and misinformation; they just need to exploit the AI’s blind trust in the internet.

Let’s break down Tobias Diehl’s work and see what lessons we can learn from it.

Step #1: AI’s Foundational Flaw

The core of the vulnerability Tobias discovered is really simple. When a user asks Microsoft Copilot a question about a topic outside its original training data, it doesn’t just guess. It performs a Bing search and treats the top-ranked result as its “source of truth.” It then processes that content and presents it to the user as a definitive answer.

This is a critical flaw. While Bing’s search ranking algorithm has been refined for over a decade, it’s not infallible and can be manipulated. An attacker who can control the top search result for a specific query can effectively control what Copilot tells its users. This simple, direct pipeline from a search engine to an AI’s brain is the foundation of the attack.

Step #2: Proof Of Concept

Tobias leveraged a concept he calls a “data void,” which he describes as a “search‑engine vacuum.” A data void occurs when a search term exists but there is little or no relevant, up‑to‑date content available for it. In such a vacuum, an attacker can more easily create and rank their own content. Moreover, data voids can be deliberately engineered.

Using the proof‑of‑concept from Microsoft’s Zero Day Quest event, we can see how readily our trust can be manipulated. Zero Day Quest invites security researchers to discover and report high‑impact vulnerabilities in Microsoft products. Anticipating a common user query—“Where can I stream Zero Day Quest?”—Tobias began preparing the attack surface. He created a website, https://www.watchzerodayquest.com, containing the following content:

As you can see, the page resembles a typical FAQ, but it includes a malicious PowerShell command. After four weeks, Tobias managed to get the site ranked for this event.

Consequently, a user could receive the following response about Zero Day Quest from Copilot:

At the time of writing, Copilot does not respond that way.

But there are other AI assistants.

And as you can see, some of them easily provide dangerous installation instructions for command‑and‑control (C2) beacons.

Summary

This research shows that AI assistants that trust real‑time search results have a big weakness. Because they automatically trust what a search engine says, attackers can easily exploit them, causing serious damage.

The post Hacking Artificial Intelligence (AI): Hijacking AI Trust to Spread C2 Instructions first appeared on Hackers Arise.

Sherpa Intelligence: Your Guide Up a Mountain of Information!

Join me over at the Sherpa Intelligence Substack! I will be working to move over the posts from Medium and then solely keep this as an archive.

Subscribe for free or become a Founding Member with a paid subscription!

Get features like:

“What’d I Miss?” a Monday morning publication with a round up of Information Security and Data Privacy news items from the past weekend.

“Five for Friday” a Friday mid-day newsletter about key Information Security and Data Privacy news items that you may have missed during the week.

Coming soon! More posts with podcasts, OSINT, and other topics TBD!

Go check out: sherpaintelligence.substack.com by clicking the image below

Sherpa Intelligence | Substack

Sherpa Intelligence: Your Guide Up a Mountain of Information!

A roundup of cybersecurity and data privacy news items regarding the transportation industry for the year 2024.

Transportation, as defined for this newsletter, includes maritime, rail, aviation, bus, car, trucking, and more.

This is not a comprehensive list, rather, highlights from each month of the year.

January 2024

• Saudi Arabia Boosts Railway Cybersecurity
  (Dark Reading, January 26th)
• Addressing OT cybersecurity threats in transportation sector through enhanced strategies, collaboration
  (Industrial Cyber, January 28th)
• Medusa ransomware gang claimed responsibility for the attack against the Kansas City Area Transportation Authority (KCATA)
  (Security Affairs, January 28th)

February 2024

• A fleet of drones is being deployed to monitor NSW traffic
  (Cyber Daily Australia, February 5th)
• Chinese hackers infiltrated plane, train and water systems for five years, US says
  (The Guardian UK, February 8th)
• Biden administration issues executive order on port cybersecurity
  (Cybersecurity Dive, February 21st)

March 2024

• New rules proposed to address cyber security in maritime industry
  (WorkBoat, March 5th)
• A Brazen Yogurt Heist Shows How Cyber Gangs Are Hijacking U.S. Goods
  (The Wall Street Journal, March 24th)
• Israeli firm C2A to supply cybersecurity platform for Daimler Trucks
  (Reuters, March 28th)

April 2024

• U.S. Department of Transportation to Review Airlines’ Data Security and Privacy Policies
  (CPO Magazine, April 1st)
• Sabotage on European railways: Czech minister accuses Russia of attempts
  (Railway Supply, April 9th)
• Transportation industry hit hard by cyber attacks in 2023
  (Logistics Middle East, April 15th)
• Navigating cybersecurity challenges in the transport industry
  (Railway Technology, April 22nd)
• Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) report outlines changing pattern in transit cybersecurity risk and how to manage it
  (Mass Transit, April 25th)

May 2024

• Adversarial Seas: AI and the Evolving Cyber Threat in Maritime
  (MarineLink, May 7th)
• Automotive Cybersecurity Tool Launches
  (IoT World, May 8th)
• A cyberattack took down Metro’s website for two hours. Here’s what a cybersecurity expert says
  (NBC-4 Washington, May 14th)
• Coast Guard To Empower Maritime Cybersecurity
  (AFCEA International, May 31st)

June 2024

• Transit Cybersecurity and Threat and Vulnerability Assessments, Public Transit Risk Assessment Methodology
  (Mass Transit, June 4th)
• Chinese Automaker Partnership Bolsters Electric Vehicle Cybersecurity
  (IoT World Today, June 17th)
• Oahu public transportation targeted in cyber attack
  (KHON-2 Honolulu, June 18th)
• Car dealership outages drag on after CDK cyberattacks
  (TechCrunch, June 24th)
• Rochester Institute of Technology researchers develop cybersecurity protocols for future smart transportation systems
  (RIT, June 25th)
• DOD’s network defense arm is working to protect logistics for Transportation Command
  (DefenseScoop, June 28th)

July 2024

• The train outta cyber trouble in the smart city
  (ERP Today, July 1st)
• CISA Adds New Resources to Marine Transportation System Resilience Assessment Guide
  (ExecutiveGov, July 3rd)
• Transportation a top 10 target of cyberattackers, cases nearly triple last year
  (CCJ Digital, July 8th)
• WhatsApp Android Users in India Targeted by Regional Transport Office Phishing Scam
  (The Cyber Express, July 9th)
• New DHS report highlights gaps in cybersecurity efforts of Coast Guard for marine transportation systems
  (Industrial Cyber, July 15th)
• The Cybersecurity Problem (and Opportunity) in Supply Chain Management
  (Talking Logistics, July 18th)
• Worldwide tech issue hit Boston’s hospitals and transportation
  (WBUR, July 19th)
  Note: Not necessarily a cybersecurity issue, but illustrating how interconnected different industries are.

August 2024

• AutoCanada announces fresh cybersecurity breach as earnings hit by previous incident
  (Financial Post, August 13th)
• Preventing Transportation Industry Cyber Attacks
  (Supply & Demand Chain Executive, August 14th)
• Transmitting Safety: Taking on the Cybersecurity Threats to Transportation
  (Illinois Tech, August 21st)
• Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Proposes Cybersecurity Protections for Certification
  (Aviation International News, August 22nd)
• Seattle-Tacoma Airport In The Crosshairs Of Hackers
  (Forbes, August 25th)
• Malaysian public transport operator Prasarana confirms cybersecurity incident
  (FMT, August 26th)
• Global Cyber Outage Hurt July Airport Traffic
  (Urban Milwaukee, August 31st)

September 2024

• Transport for London hit by cyber attack
  (Computer Weekly, September 3rd)
• 17-Year-Old Arrested in Connection with Cyber Attack Affecting Transport for London
  (The Hacker News, September 13th)
• Transportation Companies Hit by Cyberattacks Using Lumma Stealer and NetSupport Malware
  (The Hacker News, September 25th)

October 2024

• Transportation Cybersecurity Handbook
  (Industrial Cyber, October 1st)
• Sabotage: Protecting European Transportation Networks from Russia
  (Center for European Policy Analysis, October 9th)
• White House Adviser Addresses Fleets’ Need for Cybersecurity
  (Transport Topics, October 29th)

November 2024

• TSA proposes new cybersecurity requirements for some railroads, other transportation systems
  (Trains, November 7th)
• Managing Cyber Risk With USCG’s New Maritime Security Directive
  (The Maritime Executive, November 17th)
• Ransomware attack from Russia hits Japan’s biggest port, delaying cargo
  (The Straits Times SG, November 18th)
• A Cybersecurity Playbook for Trucking in 2025
  (Transport Topics, November 22nd)
• Keppel Telecommunications and Transportation hit by data breach
  (The Straits Times SG, November 25th)
• Coast Guard adds new cyber requirements for ship-to-shore cranes
  (Federal News Network, November 27th)

December 2024

• TSA Announces Proposed Pipeline, Railroad, Bus Cybersecurity Rules
  (The National Law Review, December 4th)
• The Defence Forces and the Finnish Transport and Communications Agency started a cyber defence working group
  (Finnish Defense Forces, December 19th)
• Japan Airlines systems back to normal after cyberattack delayed flights
  (Reuters, December 26th)

Sherpa Intelligence: Your Guide Up a Mountain of Information!

News Items from October 1, 2024 — December 15, 2024

1. The EU and its Latin American & Caribbean partners leverage the responsible use of data
   (The Diplomatic Service of the European Union, October 1st)
2. Caribbean Digital Transformation Project provides training to boost national cyber security
   (Dominica News Online, October 2nd)
3. 60% of Caribbean organisations delayed in digital transformation
   (Loop News Jamaica, October 3rd)
4. Dominica aims to establish Cyber Incident Response Team to strengthen cybersecurity infrastructure
   (Associates Times, October 8th)
5. Experts: Small businesses in cybersecurity crisis as AI-driven attacks escalate
   (Barbados Today, October 11th)
6. ‘Urgent threat’ to critical infrastructure, warns cybersecurity expert
   (Barbados Today, October 17th)
7. Digital is the path to growth in Latin America & the Caribbean
   (The Diplomatic Service of the European Union, November 8th)
8. Bahamas must “catch up” to global cybersecurity standards, says expert
   (Eyewitness News, November 14th)
9. Latin American & the Caribbean countries most targeted by phishing attacks in 2021
   (Statista, November 25th)
10. Caribbean Nations Security Conference (CANSEC) 24: Strengthening Bonds, Securing Futures, United for Regional Security
    (Dialogo Americas, December 13th)

Sherpa Intelligence: Your Guide Up a Mountain of Information!

Sunday, December 1, 2024 — Sunday, December 8, 2024

A baker’s dozen of Information Security & Data Privacy news items that you may have missed!

1. How to ensure safer digital environment in Nigeria
   (The Nation NG, December 1st)
2. Cyber attack prompts Stoli Group USA bankruptcy filing
   (The Spirits Business, December 2nd)
3. Indiana begins offering water systems free cyber assessments
   (State Scoop, December 3rd)
4. United Kingdom facing increased hostile activity in cyberspace, security official warns
   (Reuters, December 3rd)
5. ‘Aggressive’ Russian cyber attacks boosted Romania’s pro-Moscow presidential candidate
   (France 24, December 4th)
6. NHS Ransomware Attack: Russian INC Ransom Gang Steals Patient Data
   (HackRead, December 4th)
7. Growing Cyber Talent in The Bronx
   (City University of New York, December 5th)
8. Industrial Cyber Security Market Is Booming As Firms Embrace AI And IIoT
   (Forbes, December 5th)
9. Movie Theater Data Breach Leads to Settlement and Class Action Lawsuits
   (Troutman Pepper, December 6th)
10. NATO to launch new cyber center by 2028
    (Breaking Defense, December 6th)
11. Transport for London (TfL) cyber attack cost over £30m to date
    (Computer Weekly, December 6th)
12. House and Senate defense committees agree on independent cyber force assessment
    (Defense Scoop, December 7th)
13. From Europe to South Africa: Where Is the World on Cyber Defense?
    (Government Technology, December 8th)

Sherpa Intelligence: Your Guide Up a Mountain of Information!

Sunday, November 17, 2024 — Sunday, November 24, 2024

A baker’s dozen of Information Security & Data Privacy news items that you may have missed!

1. Army Cyber AI monitoring tool, Panoptic Junction or PJ, moves to 12-month pilot
   (Defense Scoop, November 18th)
2. ‘Critical’ cyber vulnerabilities found in many water utilities, warns EPA inspector general
   (State Scoop, November 18th)
3. Energy Department’s ‘Energy Threat Analysis Center’ cyber threat center goes operational
   (Federal News Network, November 18th)
4. United Kingdom’s largest water and waste treatment company Thames Water’s IT ‘falling apart’ and is hit by cyber-attacks, sources claim
   (The Guardian, November 18th)
5. Moody’s rates education sector at ‘high’ cyber risk in 2024
   (K-12 Dive, November 19th)
6. Rail and pipeline representatives push to dial back Transportation Security Administration’s cyber mandates
   (Cyber Scoop, November 19th)
7. Note to Industry: Make Spanish Language-Enabled Cybersecurity Tools
   (The Cyber Edge by Signal, November 21st)
8. Now Hackers Are Using Snail Mail In Cyber Attacks — Here’s How
   (Forbes, November 21st)
9. The Philippine army is recruiting young tech civilians to fight cyber attacks
   (Rest of World, November 21st)
10. Report: Media &Entertainment taking longer to recover from cyber attacks
    (Advanced Television, November 21st)
11. U.S. Coast Guard Sounds Alarm on Cyber Threats from Chinese Port Cranes
    (gCaptain, November 22nd)
12. Russia ‘aggressive’ and ‘reckless’ in cyber realm and threat to Nato, UK minister to warn
    (The Guardian, November 23rd)
13. Iranian Handala Hacking Group Claims Cyber Attack on Silicom, Mossad’s Cover Company
    (Sri Lanka Guardian, November 25th)

Sherpa Intelligence: Your Guide Up a Mountain of Information!

Sunday, November 10, 2024 — Sunday, November 17, 2024

A baker’s dozen of Information Security & Data Privacy news items that you may have missed!

1. City of Sheboygan, Wisconsin hit by apparent ransomware attack
   (Wisconsin Public Radio, November 11th)
2. Emphasizing preparedness: The role of out-of-band communications in cyber incident response
   (Marsh, November 11th)
3. Recent SEC Cyber-Related Enforcement Actions Emphasize the Importance of Robust Disclosure Controls
   (JD Supra/Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, November 11th)
4. New United Kingdom Research and Innovation (UKRI)-funded network to bolster UK’s cyber security research ecosystem
   (University of Oxford, November 12th)
5. Grocery Giant Ahold Delhaize’s Cyber Incident Signals Wider Digital Achilles’ Heel
   (PYMNTS, November 13th)
   Related: Food Lion involved in cyber attack: Issues a statement
   (Davidson Local, November 13th)
6. Ransomware fiends boast they’ve stolen 1.4TB from US pharmacy network
   (The Register, November 13th)
7. How Maryland’s bug bounty hackers found cyber vulnerabilities the state couldn’t
   (State Scoop, November 14th)
8. Cyber breach halts gun background checks in Washington State
   (KREM, November 15th)
9. Fishing for phishy messages: predicting phishing susceptibility through the lens of cyber-routine activities theory and heuristic-systematic model
   (Nature, November 15th)
10. Ford recall on a control system cyber issue
    (Control Global, November 15th)
11. Government of Mexico’s official website claimed by RansomHub gang
    (Cyber News, November 15th)
12. Keeping Rail, Metro Networks Safe From Cyber Threats
    (Railway Age, November 15th)
13. Negotiate with Hackers? Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney Discuss
    (Cyber Magazine, November 16th)

Sherpa Intelligence: Your Guide Up a Mountain of Information!

Sunday, November 3, 2024 — Sunday, November 10, 2024

A baker’s dozen of Information Security & Data Privacy news items that you may have missed!

1. Food and Ag-ISAC publishes cyber threat report, broadens scope beyond ransomware
   (Industrial Cyber, November 5th)
2. Schneider Electric investigating cyber intrusion after threat actor gains access to platform
   (Cybersecurity Dive, November 5th)
3. USDA, ONCD, NRWA launch initiative to bolster cybersecurity in rural water systems
   (Industrial Cyber, November 5th)
   Note: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), White House Office of the National Cyber Director (ONCD), National Rural Water Association (NRWA)
4. Cyber-Attack on Microlise Disrupts DHL and Serco Tracking Services
   (InfoSecurity Magazine, November 6th)
5. Face of Defense: Navy IT Specialist Makes U.S. Women’s Cyber Team
   (U.S. Department of Defense, November 6th)
6. What Telegram’s recent policy shift means for cyber crime
   (Security Intelligence, November 6th)
7. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) rule would require cyber risk management for railroads
   (DC Velocity, November 7th)
8. Another US law firm reaches data breach settlement as cyber risks mount
   (Reuters, November 8th)
9. As Part of Cyber Workforce Development, DOD Lowers Time-to-Hire for Civilians
   (U.S. Department of Defense, November 8th)
10. SEC Enforcement Heats up on Key Public Company Topics: Cyber Disclosure, Director Independence and Regulation FD
    (White & Case, November 8th)
11. Credit cards readers across Israeli stores, gas stations crash in cyberattack
    (The Jerusalem Post, November 10th)
12. “Knock Knock:” The Cyber Repressive Machinery of the Venezuelan Government, Exposed
    (Caracas Chronicles, November 10th)
13. North Korean Cyber Group Targets Cryptocurrency Industry with ‘Hidden Risk’ Malware on MacOS
    (Brave NewCoin, November 10th)

InfoSecSherpa: Your Guide Up a Mountain of Information!

1. Sharp rise in these asset scams in South Africa
   (Business Tech, April 15th)
2. Kaspersky Report Shows 40% Increase In Crypto Phishing Attacks In Just One Year
   (Crypto News BTC, April 15th)
3. Meet the hacker armies on Ukraine’s cyber front line
   (BBC News, April 14th)
4. Rheinmetall suffers cyber attack, military business unaffected, spokesperson says
   (Reuters, April 14th)
5. Cyber attack knocks out service on National Capital Commission’s website
   (Ottawa Citizen, April 14th)
6. Supermarket giant’s credit card customers caught up in massive cyber hack
   (9 News Australia, April 15th)
7. ‘Hacktivist Indonesia’ claims to attack 12,000 Indian Govt websites; Govt issues cyber alert
   (Organiser, April 15th)
8. Pro-Russian hackers suspected in cyber attacks on Canadian ports
   (Port Technology International, April 14th)
9. How mass layoffs can create new risks for corporate security
   (VentureBeat, April 14th)
10. NIST Wants to Mitigate Smart Home Telehealth Cybersecurity Risks
    (Nextgov, April 14th)

InfoSecSherpa: Your Guide Up a Mountain of Information!

1. Anne Keast-Butler: Britain appoints first woman to lead spy agency GCHQ
   (The Record by Recorded Future, April 11th)
2. Mapping the Changes in the IT/OT Landscape
   (TrueFort, April 11th)
3. KFC & Pizza Hut Discloses Data Breach — Users Personal Information Stolen
   (Cyber Security News, April 11th)
4. Upcoming International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Conference on Computer Security: Addressing Security for Safety
   (IAEA, April 11th)
5. Russia’s top hacker exposed by Ukrainian activists
   (CyberNews, April 11th)
6. US SEC seeks to expand its Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit
   (CoinTelegraph, April 11th)
7. Space Hellas coordinates three new European cyber-security projects
   (Telecompaper, April 11th)
8. Estonian National Charged for Helping Russia to Purchase U.S. Hacking Tools
   (Cyber Security News, April 11th)
9. Fitbit Will Soon Let You Log In With Your Google Account
   (CNET, April 11th)
10. Battle could be brewing over new FCC data breach reporting rules
    (CSO Online, April 11th)

InfoSecSherpa: Your Guide Up a Mountain of Information!

1. State Dept wants ‘cyber assistance fund’ to aid allies and partners against hackers
   (Breaking Defense, April 10th)
2. Oil and gas sector routinely targeted by cyber attackers, experts say
   (CTV News Calgary, April 10th)
3. Apple squashes iOS, macOS zero-day bugs already exploited by snoops
   (The Register, April 10th)
4. 6 states now have PII, data privacy laws; 7 more considering legislation
   (Repairer Driven News, April 10th)
5. Cyber Threats Facing Sports And Media Organizations
   (Cryptopolitan, April 10th)
6. University of Guelph begins notifying individuals impacted by cyber incident
   (CTV News Kitchener, April 10th)
7. HawaiiUSA Federal Credit Union Confirms Recent Data Breach Affected Over 20k Customers
   (JDSupra/Console and Associates, P.C., April 10th)
8. N-Sea deploys network security on offshore geo-survey ship
   (Riviera, April 10th)
9. Big Pharma-partnered Evotec on high alert after cyber attack takes systems offline
   (Fierce Biotech, April 10th)
10. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Provides Guidance on Cybersecurity Best Practices to Increase Supply Chain Resiliency
    (U.S. Customs and Border Protection, April 10th)

InfoSecSherpa: Your Guide Up a Mountain of Information!

1. China Accuses US of Maintaining Cybersecurity Hegemony Under False Pretexts
   (MENA FN, April 9th)
2. Major Cyber Insurance Overhaul Begins Now
   (Government Technology, April 9th)
3. ‘CEO Scam’ Alert; What is it and how this new menace is targeting startup ecosystem
   (CNBC TV 18, April 9th)
4. Frédéric Raynal, white knight of cybersecurity
   (Les Echos Entrepreneurs, April 9th) Note: Article is in French
5. US Treasury Department Warns of Cybercriminals Using DeFi Services to Launder Illicit Funds
   (MENA FN, April 9th)
6. What Is Personal Cyber Insurance — and Should You Buy It?
   (The Wall Street Journal, April 9th)
7. Neue Zürcher Zeitung has to shut down the newspaper production system after a cyber attack
   (Data Breaches Net, April 9th)
8. Cochin International Airport Limited (CIAL) website comes under attack
   (The Hindu, April 8th)
9. Cyber attack leaves irrigation systems in Upper Galilee dysfunctional
   (The Jerusalem Post, April 9th)
10. HackForGov competition launched this week in the Philippines
    (The Manila Times, April 9th)