Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Today — 15 December 2025Main stream

8 tips for rebuilding an AI-ready data strategy

15 December 2025 at 05:01

Any organization that wants to have a leading AI strategy must first have a winning data strategy.

That’s the message from Ed Lovely, vice president and chief data officer for IBM.

“When you think about scaling AI, data is the foundation,” he says.

However, few organizations have a data architecture aligned to their AI ambitions, he says. Instead, they have siloed data that’s not governed by consistent data standards — the result of longstanding enterprise data strategies that created IT environments application by application to deliver point-in-time decisions rather than to support enterprise-wide artificial intelligence deployments.

The 2025 IBM study AI Ambitions Are Surging, But Is Enterprise Data Ready? shows just how many are struggling with their data. It found that only 26% of 1,700 CDOs worldwide feel confident their data can support new AI-enabled revenue streams.

What’s needed, Lovely says, is an integrated enterprise data architecture, where the same standards, governance, and metadata are applied “regardless of where data is born.”

Lovely is not alone in seeing a need for organizations to update their data strategies.

“Most organizations need to modernize their data strategies because AI changes not just how data is used, but why it’s used and where value is created,” says Adam Wright, research manager for IDC’s Global DataSphere and Global StorageSphere research programs and co-author of the 2025 report Content Creation in the Age of Generative AI.

“Traditional data strategies were built for reporting, BI, and automation, but AI requires far more dynamic, granular, and real-time data pipelines that can fuel iterative, model-driven workflows. This means shifting from static data governance to continuous data quality monitoring, stronger metadata and lineage tracking, and retention policies that reflect AI’s blend of ephemeral, cached, and saved data,” he says. “The AI era demands that organizations evolve from a collect/store everything mentality toward intentional, value-driven data strategies that balance cost, risk, and the specific AI outcomes they want to achieve.”

High-maturity data foundations

Most organizations are far from that objective.

“Many organizations continue to struggle with having the ‘right’ data, whether that means sufficient volume, appropriate quality, or the necessary contextual metadata to support AI use cases,” Wright says. “In IDC research and industry conversations, data readiness consistently emerges as one of the top barriers to realizing AI value, often outranking compute cost or model selection. Most enterprises are still dealing with fragmented systems, inconsistent governance, and limited visibility into what data they actually have and how trustworthy it is.”

Lovely says IBM had faced many such challenges but spent the past three years tackling them to make its data AI ready.

IBM’s data strategy for the AI era included multiple changes to longstanding approaches, enabling it to build what Lovely calls an integrated enterprise data architecture. For example, the company retained the concept of data owners but “helped them understand that the data is an IBM asset, and if we’re able to democratize it in a controlled, secure way, we can run the business in a better, more productive way,” Lovely says.

As a result, IBM moved from multiple teams managing siloed data to a common team using common standards and common architectures. Enterprise leaders also consolidated 300 terabytes of data, selecting needed data based on the outcomes the company seeks and the workflows that drive those outcomes.

“We were deliberate,” Lovely says, adding that its data platform now covers about 80% of IBM workflows. “One of the greatest productivity unlocks for an enterprise today is to create an integrated enterprise data architecture. We’re rapidly deploying AI at our company because of our investment in data.”

8 tips for building a better data strategy

To build high maturity in data foundations and data consumption capabilities, organizations need a data strategy for the AI era — one that enforces data quality, breaks down data siloes, and aligns data capabilities with the AI use cases prioritized by the business.

Experts offer steps to take:

1. Rethink data ownership

“Traditional models that treat data ownership as a purely IT issue no longer work when business units, product teams, and AI platforms are all generating and transforming data continuously,” Wright explains. “Ideally, clear accountability should sit with a senior data leader such as a CDO, but organizations without a CDO must ensure that data governance responsibilities are explicitly distributed across IT, security, and the business.”

It’s critical to have “a single point of authority for defining policies and a federated model for execution, so that business units remain empowered but not unchecked,” he adds.

Manjeet Rege, professor and chair of the Department of Software Engineering and Data Science and director of the Center for Applied Artificial Intelligence at the University of St. Thomas, advises organizations to reframe data owners as data stewards, who don’t own the data but rather own the meaning and quality of the data based on standards, governance, security, and interoperability set by a central data function.

2. Break down siloes

To do this, “CIOs need to align business units around shared AI and data outcomes, because gen AI only delivers value when workflows, processes, and data sources are connected across the enterprise,” Wright says.

“This means establishing cross-functional governance, standardizing taxonomies and policies, and creating incentives for teams to share data rather than protect it,” he adds. “Technology helps through unified platforms, metadata layers, and common security frameworks, but the real unlock comes from coordinated leadership across the C-suite and business stakeholders.”

3. Invest in data technologies for the AI era

These technologies include modern data lakes and data lakehouses, vector databases, and scalable object storage, all of which “can handle high-volume, multimodal data with strong governance,” Wright says.

Organizations also need orchestration and pipeline tools that automate ingestion, cleansing, transformation, and movement so that AI workflows can run reliably end-to-end. Metadata engines and governance layers are essential to enable models to understand context, track lineage, and safely and reliably use both structured and unstructured data.

Build a data platform layer that is “modular, governed, and able to evolve,” Rege advises. “You need architecture that can treat data as a reusable product, and not just for a single pipeline, and can be used for both batch and real-time needs.”

Rege also endorses data lakes and data lakehouses, saying they’re “becoming the backbones of AI because they can handle structured and unstructured data.”

Additionally, Shayan Mohanty, chief AI and data officer at Thoughtworks, advises CIOs to build a composable enterprise, with modular technologies and flexible structures that enable humans and AI to access data and work across the multiple layers.

Experts also advise CIOs to invest in technologies that address emerging data lifecycle needs.

“Generative AI is fundamentally reshaping the data lifecycle, creating a far more dynamic mix of ephemeral, cached, and persistently stored content. Most gen AI outputs are short-lived and used only for seconds, minutes, or hours, which increases the need for high-performance infrastructure like DRAM and SSDs to handle rapid iteration, caching, and volatile workflows,” Wright says.

“But at the same time, a meaningful subset of gen AI outputs does persist, such as finalized documents, approved media assets, synthetic training datasets, and compliance-relevant content, and these still rely heavily on cost-efficient, high-capacity HDDs for long-term storage,” he adds. “As gen AI adoption grows, organizations will need data strategies that accommodate this full lifecycle from ultra-fast memory for transient content to robust HDD-based systems for durable archives, because the storage burden/dynamics is shifting.”

4. Automate and add intelligence to the data architecture

Mohanty blames the poor state of enterprise data on “a rift between data producers and data consumers,” with the data being produced going into a “giant pile somewhere, in what’s called data warehouses” with analytics layers then created to make use of it. This approach, he notes, requires a lot of human knowledge and manual effort to make work.

He advises organizations to adopt a data product mindset “to bring data producers and data consumers closer together” and to add automation and intelligence to their enterprise architecture so that AI can identify and access the right data when needed.

CIOs can use Model Context Protocol (MCP) to wrap data and provide that protocol-level access, Mohanty says, noting that access requires organizations to encode information in its catalog and tools to ensure data discoverability.

5. Ensure structured and unstructured data is AI-ready

“Structured data is AI-ready when it is consistently formatted, well-governed, and enriched with accurate metadata, making it easy for models to understand and use,” Wright says. “Organizations should prioritize strong data quality controls, master data management, and clear ownership so structured datasets remain reliable, interoperable, and aligned to specific AI use cases.”

Experts stress the need to bring that same discipline to unstructured data, ensuring that unstructured data is also properly tagged, classified, and enriched with metadata so AI systems can understand and retrieve it effectively.

“You need to treat unstructured data as a first-class data asset,” Rege says. “Most of the most interesting AI use cases live in unstructured data like customer service audio calls, messages, and documents, but for many organization organizations unstructured data remains a blind spot.”

Rege advises storing it in vector databases where information is searchable.

6. Consider external data sources and synthetic data

“Organizations should absolutely evaluate whether external or synthetic data is needed when their existing data is incomplete, biased, too small, or poorly aligned with the AI use case they’re trying to pursue,” Wright says, noting that “synthetic data becomes especially useful when real data is sensitive, costly to collect, or limited by privacy, regulatory, or operational constraints.”

7. Implement a high-maturity data foundation incrementally

Don’t wait until data is in a perfect place to start, says Shibani Ahuja, senior vice president of enterprise IT strategy at Salesforce.

“There are organizations that feel they have to get all their data right before they can pull the trigger, but they’re also getting pressure to start on the journey,” she says.

As is the case when maturing most enterprise programs, CIOs and their executive colleagues can — and should — take an incremental approach to building a data program for the AI era.

Ahuja recommends maturing a data program by working outcome to outcome, creating a data strategy and architecture to support one AI-driven outcome and then moving onto subsequent ones.

“It’s a way of thinking: reverse engineering from what you need,” Ahuja says. “Put something in production, make sure you have the right guardrails, observe it, and tweak it so it scales, then put in the next one.”

8. Take a cross-functional approach to data team building

“Data should be supported by a cross-functional ecosystem that includes IT, data governance, security, and the business units that actually use the data to drive decisions,” Wright says. “AI-era data strategy works best when these teams share ownership, where IT teams enable the infrastructure, governance teams ensure trust and quality, and business teams define the context and value.”

Before yesterdayMain stream

Instead of fixing WoW’s new floating house exploit, Blizzard makes it official

11 December 2025 at 18:03

Long-time World of Warcraft players have been waiting 21 years for the new in-game housing features that Blizzard officially announced last year and which launched in early access last week. Shortly after that launch, though, players quickly discovered a way to make their houses float high above the ground by exploiting an unintended, invisible UI glitch.

Now, Blizzard says that the overwhelming response to that accidental house hovering has been so strong that it’s pivoting to integrate it as an official part of the game.

“We were going to fix flying houses to bring them back to terra firma, but you all made such awesome stuff, so we made it possible with the base UI instead,” WoW Principal Designer Jesse Kurlancheek posted on social media Tuesday. Lead Producer Kyle Hartline followed up on that announcement with some behind-the-scenes gossip: “Like no joke we had an ops channel about how to roll out the float fix but folks shared like 5 of the dopest houses and we all kinda immediately agreed this was way too cool to change,” he wrote.

Read full article

Comments

© Twitter / Zorbix

Service members are set to receive a 4.2% boost in housing allowance in 2026

11 December 2025 at 14:42

Service members will see a 4.2% average increase in their basic allowance for housing in 2026 — a smaller boost than the 5.4% increase they received in 2024 and 2025. 

But the actual increases military households will receive will vary depending largely on where they are stationed and their pay grades. While the increase is higher in some areas, the rates decrease in several areas, including Phoenix, Arizona, and Brownsville, Texas. Service members stationed in areas where rates go down are protected and get to keep their existing BAH. 

Look up your 2026 BAH rate here.

The Defense Department calculates the annual rates based on surveys of rental costs and utilities in each market. Data sources include Census Bureau surveys, the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index, commercial subscription rental cost databases, major online rental listing websites, and input from the services and local installation housing offices.

The calculation of the allowance is built to cover approximately 95% of average costs for an off-base housing and utilities, leaving roughly a 5% out-of-pocket expense for service members. In 2026, these amounts range from $93 to $212. 

Since the annual rates are based on 2025 data, they may not fully reflect rapid increases in actual rental costs.

The new housing allowance rates will take effect Jan. 1, 2026.

The department estimates it will pay $29.9 billion in housing allowances to approximately one million service members in 2026.

Basic Allowance for Housing is one of the largest components of cash compensation for service members, second only to basic pay. The fiscal 2026 defense policy bill, passed by the House on Wednesday, requires the Defense Department to “conduct a study to improve the calculation of BAH to ensure it keeps up with rising rental costs.” The bill also extends the Defense Department’s authority to issue temporary increases to BAH for one more year in areas hit by disasters or where housing costs differ from current rates by more than 20%.

The 2026 BAH increase comes as service members are also poised to receive a pay raise — the legislation approved a 3.8% increase in basic pay for service members. The must-pass legislation now heads to the Senate. The bill will then go to President Donald Trump for his signature. 

In 2023, BAH rates went up an average of 12.1% after housing costs had spiked the previous year.

The post Service members are set to receive a 4.2% boost in housing allowance in 2026 first appeared on Federal News Network.

© Amelia Brust/Federal News Network

Seattle-area startup Govstream.ai raises $3.6M to improve city permitting processes using AI

4 December 2025 at 11:00
Govstream.ai aims to drastically improve cities’ permitting processes and reduce costs and timelines associated with housing development. (Govstream.ai Illustration)

Govstream.ai, a Seattle-area startup building AI-native permitting tools for local governments, raised $3.6 million in funding, the company announced Thursday.

The seed round was led by Menlo Park, Calif.-based 47th Street Partners, with participation from Nellore Capital of Palo Alto, Calif., Seattle-based Ascend, and angel investors including Socrata founder Kevin Merritt and First Due co-founder and CEO Andreas Huber.

Govstream.ai’s platform sits on top of the systems cities already use and acts as a conversational “copilot” for permit techs, planners, and reviewers. The company says the technology answers questions, checks documents, compares plan sets, and helps move applications through review faster.

Govstream.ai founder and CEO Safouen Rabah. (Govstream.ai Photo)

The first public deployment is with the City of Bellevue, where Govstream.ai’s smart assistant has been helping Development Services staff with internal permitting and zoning questions since this summer.

“Cities are under intense pressure to add housing, support small businesses, and keep development sustainable, all while working inside permitting systems that were never really rethought for this moment,” said Safouen Rabah, founder and CEO of Govstream.ai.

In Washington, for example, state projections show that roughly 1.1 million additional homes will be needed by 2044 to keep up with population growth, and about 650,000 of those will need to be affordable for low-income households.

Rabah said permitting has been digitized in pieces but not truly modernized end to end. AI can reason over hundreds of pages of plans and regulations and surface what matters.

“That’s how cities move more homes and critical infrastructure from ‘submitted’ to ‘approved’ without burning people out on either side of the counter,” Rabah said. “Every month of delay we eliminate reduces costs of a new housing unit by about $5,000 on average and makes more projects economically pencil out.”

An example of the Govstream.ai dashboard showing steps in a permit request and review. (Govstream.ai Image)

In July, Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell issued an executive order intended to speed the permitting process for housing and small businesses in the city, using AI software from Boston- and Chicago-based CivCheck to aid permit applicants and city reviewers. Other cities, including Los Angeles, Austin and Honolulu are using AI to improve their processes.

In Bellevue, Govstream.ai is targeting and seeing signs of results including:

  • A roughly 30% reduction in the burden of routine inquiries, including fewer “Where do I start?” and “Do I need a permit for this?” calls and emails.
  • Up to 50% fewer re-submittals by catching missing or incorrect items before an application is formally filed.
  • Up to 2X faster starts to first review on many project types, because reviewers start with context instead of a 200-page PDF.

Beyond Bellevue, the startup is gearing up to deploy in additional U.S. cities. Rabah declined to share financial metrics, but said revenue is growing as Govstream.ai converts design partners into production deployments.

A veteran of government-tech companies including Socrata and Tyler Technologies, Rabah started Govstream.ai in July 2024. The company currently employs five people and the new funding will fuel growth to 10 to 12 people over the next 12 months with the addition of engineering and AI roles in the Seattle area.

Govstream was previously featured in GeekWire’s Startup Radar series.

Privatized military housing is making service members and their families sick at alarming rates, survey finds

24 November 2025 at 18:41

Nearly every service member living in privatized military housing has experienced at least one serious issue in their home — and an overwhelming number say their family’s health has been negatively impacted by their housing conditions. Nearly half said a medical provider had confirmed the connection, a new survey found. 

The Change the Air Foundation recently conducted the Safe Military Housing Survey — one of the most comprehensive efforts yet to collect data the Defense Department has never been able to track accurately. The survey  was designed to answer questions previous studies had overlooked and to provide Congress and the Pentagon with better data on what families across all branches and ranks are actually experiencing in military housing. 

“We were hearing a lot of how many indoor air quality hazards and just housing hazards that these families were experiencing. But nobody was really ever asking, how is this affecting your physical health? How is this affecting your cognitive abilities? How is this affecting your mental and emotional health, and your and your personal finances? That’s a huge component of this survey,” Brandon Chappo, co-founder and director of public policy at the Change the Air Foundation, told Federal News Network. 

Erica Thompson, a military spouse and the military families’ liaison for the Change the Air Foundation, lived in military housing for 10 months at Maxwell Air Force Base located in Montgomery, Alabama. Thompson said her family immediately noticed serious issues with the house, including a failing AC system they were told couldn’t be replaced. Once contractors opened the walls without any containment, the entire family — including their dog — began experiencing a cascade of medical issues. Her son started passing out in the house and the dog started having seizures; three of their children were later diagnosed with asthma and one was diagnosed with bilateral pediatric cataracts in both eyes. 

“We saw a huge range of health implications across the board, throughout our whole family. And so I think using part of that, it was able to guide us through this questionnaire, some of those things that I wish offices knew. It was able to really give me insight into making some of these questions, because we would share our story with congressional offices, they would say, ‘How many more kids are there like yours?’ And I said, ‘I don’t know. There’s no data around that right now,’” Thompson told Federal News Network.

For decades, service members and their families living in privatized military housing have been exposed to hazardous conditions, including black mold, contaminated water, asbestos in ceilings and lead in walls. The survey found that mold, mildew or microbial growth were the most common issues, reported by 74% of respondents. More than half of respondents cited significant problems with temperature and humidity, pest infestations, water damage and HVAC failures.

“Mold and water damage can be extraordinarily hazardous to somebody’s health. That’s extremely dismaying,” Chappo said.

Overall, 76% of service members said their health has been negatively affected by housing conditions, and nearly half said a physician had confirmed their homes were making them sick. 

The survey also revealed an alarming statistic — 47% of service members said their housing issues impacted their ability to perform their duties or maintain mission readiness. The problem was particularly prevalent among those stationed in Florida. 

Three in five service members reported experiencing mental health challenges such as anxiety or depression, and roughly two in five service members said those issues affected their ability to attend work or training. One in six service members had to relocate — sometimes temporarily, sometimes permanently — often leaving behind personal items that had been damaged. 

“That is absolutely stunning. And so, if anything, it underscores the importance of trying to get these issues dealt with. It’s the fact that not only are our service members’ health and wellness being affected, it’s mission readiness. This is a national security issue, and we need to start talking about it in that light, and start really framing it in that way,” Chappo said. 

While anxiety, depression, mood changes, cognitive issues, insomnia, headaches, migraines, brain fog and skin, eye and respiratory irritation top the list of reported health problems, the survey found the health impacts to be far more extensive than that.

“This is extraordinary. These [medical conditions] weren’t just in the low percentages. We’re talking in the 20, 30, 40 percentages for some of these. Even those alone, being as high as they are, really should catch the attention of, hopefully, the country, and of course, those in Congress,” Chappo said. 

The survey found that Florida, Hawaii and Texas experienced housing-related issues at far greater rates and saw significantly higher rates of both health impacts and readiness concerns. Nearly 60% of service members stationed in Florida said housing issues impacted their ability to perform their duties. Health impacts were also higher than average — 84% of Florida service members said their families’ health had been impacted by house-related issues, compared with 83% in Hawaii and North Carolina. 

“I think it’s got to do with lots of these states are on federal land, and they don’t have to follow the state regulations for building and code, and so that’s something that needs to be looked at. But Florida, Hawaii and Texas were exponentially higher on those stats for both readiness and really across the board. And those have some really big commands in those states as well that need to have some attention drawn to it,” Thompson said. 

Marines reported the highest rates across all branches, with 85% saying their families were affected.

“We were displaced multiple times, with one displacement over 30 days. Relocation to a new home was requested, but we were denied a new home. We ultimately moved into a hotel on our dime after getting rid of everything we owned,” an active Marine service member in North Carolina told the Change the Air Foundation. 

Gaps in current dispute resolution process

Whenever a housing-related issue arises, service members are supposed to follow a three-step tenant resolution process that includes built-in escalation steps.

The first step is to file a service call. If the issue isn’t resolved to the service member’s satisfaction, it can be escalated to the Military Housing Office or the government housing office on base, along with the service member’s chain of command to help elevate the issues. Thompson said that’s where most families drop out of the process.

The survey found that nine in ten service members always reported the issues they were experiencing, but only 7% made it all the way through the tenant resolution process — and of those, 72% said it still did not resolve their problem.

One in 14 service members were denied the tenant resolution process altogether.

“I want people to try to understand this, nine of 10 service members reported issues as they should to the proper authorities. Nine of 10 had to report the same issue multiple times. 66% of those had their issues marked resolved without a satisfactory result and over 50% of those went unresolved entirely. We have a situation here where the families are asking, calling, screaming for help. They’re upholding their end of the bargain, and the other side isn’t, and it’s failing,” Chappo said.

“Only 7% of service members actually made it through the entire dispute resolution process. That shows us that it’s broken. It’s failing. It’s not working,” he added.

In addition, the survey highlights major gaps in seven-year housing histories, with only 43% of service members receiving one — and most of those were incomplete.

“You’re able to turn down a house if you recognize or see something you’re not comfortable with. But if their service calls aren’t accurate, or it’s not reporting accurately, I think that screams to a bigger issue of what is going on? What’s the further issue? It’s not only for the service members, but it’s for DoD accountability,” Thompson said. 

Out-of-pocket cost of privatized housing

Roughly half of service members reported paying an average of $1,680 out of pocket for costs such as pest control, mold inspections, hotel stays and medical bills .

“If they’re paying for pest control out of pocket, that’s not something that’s reimbursable. Our dehumidifiers and air purifiers are not reimbursable. You just end up paying out of pocket to do what you can, to try and make what you have work. And then same with medical bills, if you’re seeking extra time or care outside of the military, that’s out of pocket as well,” Thompson said. 

Nearly all military family housing in the United States — about 99% — is owned and managed by private companies. These projects are built around 50-year ground leases and legal agreements that private partners use to secure financing and guarantee predictable revenue over decades, which limited the Defense Department’s ability to cancel or renegotiate agreements when housing conditions declined, creating oversight challenges that have persisted for decades.

Thompson, along with other advocates, have been advocating for several amendments to be included in the 2026 defense policy bill, including the proposed Healthy at Home on Base Act, which would require the Defense Department to study mold and its health effects in both military housing and barracks. Another amendment would direct the department to adopt uniform mold remediation standards across all barracks and family housing.

“We’re hearing a lot of congressional offices are starting to read the report, and they’re already asking for meetings to discuss these a little more closely, and then, of course, talk about some of the fixes and solutions. We’re having some feedback and some conversations with folks at the Pentagon who are kind of taking a closer look at this as well, and trying to come up with long term fixes, as opposed to band aid fixes,” Chappo said.

The post Privatized military housing is making service members and their families sick at alarming rates, survey finds first appeared on Federal News Network.

© AP Photo/Mengshin Lin

A sheet containing resources for U.S. military families affected by on-base housing water contamination from a jet fuel leak in 2021 is seen at the Dietz family's home on Monday, April 22, 2024, in Honolulu, Hawaii. (AP Photo/Mengshin Lin)

Major problems found in almost all privatized military housing

  • A new survey found that nearly every service member living in privatized military housing has experienced serious problems in their home. Many of those issues go unresolved. The Change the Air Foundation recently found 97% of service members reported at least one significant problem in their military-provided home, with mold, mildew and water damage cited most frequently. Out of 3,401 respondents, three-quarters said their family’s health had been negatively impacted by their housing conditions, and nearly half said a medical provider had confirmed the connection.
  • The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is too often missing out on its final chance to identify improper payments through contracting. A new report from the Department of Health and Human Services inspector general found CMS routinely fell short in properly closing out contracts. Auditors say this puts billions of dollars at risk of waste, fraud and abuse. While CMS concurred with the IG's recommendations, officials say the report overstated the risk of fraud, waste, and abuse during the audit's five-year review period. The IG said contract closeout has long been a challenge for CMS, dating back to reports from 2007.
  • A transgender employee with the National Guard is suing the Trump administration over its bathroom policies in federal buildings. The administration earlier this year banned transgender and intersex federal employees from using the bathroom that aligns with their gender identity. Following the ban, the employee’s supervisors told her she could no longer use the women’s restroom. The employee, who is represented by attorneys with Democracy Forward, alleged that the administration’s policy is employee discrimination in violation of Title VII.
  • More federal employees who received layoff notices are looking to get their jobs back. Recently laid-off employees at the General Services Administration are calling on the agency to rescind their reduction-in-force notices, citing language in the recently passed continuing resolution that directed agencies to rescind the RIFs. Attorneys representing them say their clients received RIF notices before the government shutdown and were officially separated from the agency during the shutdown. Attorneys say lawmakers intended to reverse all RIF actions, not just RIF notices.
  • The Department of Veterans Affairs is pulling the plug on plans to install electric vehicle chargers at its facilities. The Biden administration directed the VA to divert $77 million dollars from its construction and technology budget to build solar-powered EV charging stations. But the department said it will now put those funds toward health care construction projects.
  • Senior Executive Service members have some new training opportunities. The Office of Personnel Management has launched two new training series centered on executive development. The trainings, available governmentwide, focus on topics like constitutional governance, budget, policy and human capital management. Executives who are interested in taking the classes can register on OPM’s website. The costs for the courses range from $1,500 to $8,500. OPM is also asking agencies to announce the availability of the trainings to their employees by Dec. 19.
  • The Defense Information Systems Agency said it needs to extend a legacy contract for software asset management, largely because of staffing issues. The agency is extending the multi-million dollar contract without competition, saying the program office that was supposed to be managing a new award has been hit hard by staff cuts, deferred resignations and hiring challenges. DISA’s justification and approval document adds another year to the contract, extending it for the second time this year. The underlying award has been in place since 2019.
    (DISA extends legacy contract for software asset management - Defense Information Systems Agency)
  • The cloud security program known as FedRAMP is getting back on track after the shutdown. FedRAMP has finalized its requirements for cloud service companies wanting to participate in the phase 20x pilot. The program management office detailed seven key changes in a new blog post. These include limiting the number of pilot participants to 10 cloud servicer providers who want to achieve a moderate authorization in an expedited way. The PMO expects to name the 10 pilot companies by Jan. 9 and have them through the new process by March 31. Additionally, FedRAMP issued a new continuous monitoring playbook, consolidating nine standalone documents and eliminating about 100 pages of redundant or outdated content.
  • The Space Force is finalizing its first “objective force” blueprint, a 15-year plan that will lay out what space systems, infrastructure and manpower the service will need to counter future threats in space. Chief of Space Operations Gen. Chance Saltzman said “the bulk of the work is almost complete,” though stakeholders likely won’t see the final product until 2026. The goal for the document is to clearly and formally communicate the Space Force’s long-term needs to its stakeholders, including Congress, defense contractors, allies and partners.

The post Major problems found in almost all privatized military housing first appeared on Federal News Network.

© Amelia Brust/Federal News Network

❌
❌