A chip that produces microscopic “earthquakes” could change smartphone design, allowing manufacturers to shrink internal components while boosting signal handling and data speeds using surface acoustic wave technology.
Microchips implanted under the skin could be portrayed as a convenient way to store and access employment and personal data. (BigStock Photo)
A bill introduced in the Washington state Legislature would ban employers from requiring or pressuring workers to be microchipped, a practice lawmakers want to prohibit before it ever becomes an issue.
The bill would prohibit employers from requiring, requesting or coercing employees to have microchips implanted in their bodies as a condition of employment, and would bar the use of subcutaneous tracking or identification technology for workplace management or surveillance.
It aims to protect worker privacy and bodily autonomy by establishing strict penalties for violations, including civil penalties starting at $10,000 and the right for aggrieved workers to sue for damages and injunctive relief.
Washington state Rep. Brianna Thomas. (Leg.Wa.Gov Photo)
While there’s no known instance of an employer seeking such action, Thomas told GeekWire the bill is a preemptive move.
“We are getting out ahead of the problem because the practice of requiring these chips is too dangerous to wait for it to show up in Washington,” she said Thursday via email. “An employee with a microchip stops being an employee — they are essentially being dehumanized into corporate equipment.”
The Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs reported that internationally, more than 50,000 people have elected to receive microchip implants to serve as their swipe keys, credit cards, and more. The organization noted that the technology is especially popular in Sweden, where chip implants are more widely accepted for gym access, e-tickets on transit systems, and to store emergency contact information.
HB 2303 would add a new section to Chapter 49.44 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), titled “Violations — Prohibited Practices.” The chapter serves as a catch-all for labor regulations that define and prohibit specific unfair or illegal activities by employers, employees, and labor representatives.
The legislation is similar to laws passed in Arkansas, California, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Utah, Wisconsin, Indiana, Alabama, and Mississippi.
“Workers cannot legitimately consent to a program because of the power dynamic between them and the employer,” Thomas said. “Implanted chips have no place in a work environment.”
Nevada is “arguably the most restrictive” on microchip implants and permanent identification markers, according to the Carnegie Council. Its law prohibits people from voluntarily electing to receive such markers in Nevada.
Thomas said HB 2303 does not go as far as Nevada’s restrictions, noting that workers would still be free to make their own choices outside the workplace.
Thomas said she believes companies will eventually pitch the technology to their employees by telling them it’s more convenient and easier — you don’t have to worry about forgetting your work access badge, etc.
“Many times convenience causes people to view things too narrowly and they don’t see the big picture,” she said. “The power dynamic between an employer and an employee makes true, uncoerced consent impossible. This is about making sure workers not only have the option but also consider all the factors when these programs are presented to them.”
The Carnegie Council also reported on the privacy, data security, and health safety concerns that microchips present, including from technologists who worry about IoT vulnerabilities in sensors and network architecture that could be exploited by hackers.
While the Washington proposal targets simple Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags, a more sophisticated wave of “brain-computer interfaces” (BCIs) is rapidly moving toward the mainstream.
Elon Musk wants to ramp up production of his Neuralink brain‑computer interface chips in 2026. He envisions the technology helping people with neurological conditions while eventually enabling humans to interact directly with computers. The company plans to make the surgical implantation process nearly fully automated to scale the procedure.
Washington’s HB 2303 is scheduled for a public hearing Jan. 14 in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards.
Recently GitHub disabled the Rockchip Linux MPP repository, following a DMCA takedown request from the FFmpeg team. As of writing the affected repository remains unavailable. At the core of this issue is the Rockchip MPP framework, which provides hardware-accelerated video operations on Rockchip SoCs. Much of the code for this was lifted verbatim from FFmpeg, with the allegation being that this occurred with the removal of the original copyright notices and authors. The Rockchip MPP framework was further re-licensed from LGPL 2.1 to the Apache license.
Most egregious of all is perhaps that the FFmpeg team privately contacted Rockchip about this nearly two years ago, with clearly no action taken since. Thus FFmpeg demands that Rockchip either undoes these actions that violate the LGPL, or remove all infringing files.
This news and further context is also covered by [Brodie Robertson] in a video. What’s interesting is that Rockchip in public communications and in GitHub issues are clearly aware of this license issue, but seem to defer dealing with it until some undefined point in the future. Clearly that was the wrong choice by Rockchip, though it remains a major question what will happen next. [Brodie] speculates that Rockchip will keep ignoring the issue, but is hopeful that he’ll be proven wrong.
If you are looking for the absolutely perfect eggless chocolate muffins recipe with a no-fail guarantee then this is it! I can vouch for these decadent chocolate muffins which are made without any eggs yet turned out super-moist with a melt-in-mouth texture!
Eggless baking was not my forte, but after I found this eggless chocolate muffins recipe on YouTube on this beautiful channel and tried it twice, things have changed for good!
I am seriously amazed how moist and tender these eggless chocolate muffins turned out and with that bitter-sweet taste of dark chocolate, these are real mood-boosters!
If you think that eggless muffins or cakes do not rise enough, this recipe will prove you wrong! These eggless chocolate muffins rose like a dream, making a super-fluffy & beautifully soft internal texture.
Why are these Eggless chocolate muffins special?
Since the time I have started a ‘no-sugar’ (or ‘low-sugar’ to be more realistic!) diet, I have minimized the frequency of baking cakes or any desserts for that matter!
Otherwise how would you be able to resist the home-baked sweets which are just too good to not eat!
But on a fine morning I started craving for something deep dark chocolatey which is not too sweet but has that bakery style texture. And it was too strong a craving!
So I started searching for that dreamy chocolatey bite and these eggless chocolate muffins appeared with all their glory! And it was simply impossible to resist not making them immediately!
After ages I baked these sinfully decadent chocolate muffins which turned out exactly how I desired and relished them with all my soul!
At the same time, I had to remain mindful of my weight loss journey where I have put in a lot of hard work and as you know too much of these can instantly add extra pounds on your scale!
Hence I had to keep a check on my craving for these goodies; so I distributed half of them among my neighbors (hopefully they liked them as much as we did!).
This way I could enjoy my home-baked eggless chocolate muffins without overdoing them way too much! Absolute win-win!
Login
