What happens next with shutdown Hatch Act complaints?
Investigators at the Office of Special Counsel returning to their jobs earlier this month would likely have been greeted with multiple Hatch Act complaints after a wave of alleged partisan political messaging by federal agencies during the shutdown.
Throughout the 43-day shutdown, multiple agencies posted messages on their websites blaming the shutdown on the βradical left,β βDemocratsβ and other politically tinged phrases.
Those actions immediately drew multiple Hatch Act complaints. The 1939 law restricts political activities by federal employees and is intended to ensure the nonpartisan administration of government programs.
The Education Department also changed furloughed employeesβ out-of-office email replies to blame the shutdown on βDemocrat senators.β A federal judge earlier this month found that the agency had violated employeesβ First Amendment rights. Education was forced to change the out-of-office reply shortly before the shutdown ended.
βIn this compressed timeframe, we havenβt seen this level of potential Hatch Act violations with regards to just changing emails, publishing these notices on the government websites and engaging in this partisan messaging,β Michael Fallings, managing partner at law firm Tully Rinckey, told Federal News Network.
The use of federal agency websites for such messaging was also a novel development in the long-running evolution of the Hatch Act.
Kedric Payne, who helped represent Education Department employees as vice president, general counsel and senior director of ethics at the Campaign Legal Center, said the shutdown messaging βcould have been a test run of what may happen during the election year.β
βYou could imagine a situation where, during the election year, there may be similar banners, similar email statements and other communications coming from the agencies that are partisan,β Payne told Federal News Network. βIf there are no consequences for what happened during the shutdown, thereβs not a real threat for the agencies to limit themselves on violating the Hatch Act or First Amendment rights.β
Office of Special Counsel role
OSC is responsible for investigating Hatch Act complaints. But most OSC staff were furloughed through the shutdown. Out of the agencyβs 122 employees, just 17 were kept onboard, according to the OSC shutdown plan. Those excepted staff were primarily focused on handling whistleblower disclosures βinvolving a substantial and serious risk to public health or safety or those requiring emergency action to protect property.β
Multiple nonprofit organizations publicized their Hatch Act complaints. The total number of Hatch Act complaints received by OSC isnβt public, andΒ OSC didnβt respond to a request for comment.
But given OSCβs relatively small staff, the backlog of work due to the furlough, and the large number of known complaints, Fallings expects the Hatch Act cases will likely face delays. OSC typically takes 120 days to conduct preliminary reviews, but there isnβt a statutory deadline for completing Hatch Act investigations.
βI think what OSC would do is try to figure out which complaints may have the most proof of a violation, and pursue those,β Fallings said.
In his opinion siding with Education Department employees and their union, District Judge Christopher Cooper referenced the Hatch Act and pointed to the executive branchβs βmultifront campaign to assign blame for the government shutdown.β
βIt began by plastering politically-charged language on official public websites,β Cooper wrote. βApparently, that wasnβt enough. The department waited until its furloughed employees lost access to their email, then gratuitously changed their out-of-office messages to include yet another partisan message, thereby turning its own workforce into political spokespeople through their official email accounts. The department may have added insult to injury, but it also overplayed its hand.β
While the case ultimately hinged on federal employeesβ First Amendment rights, Payne said Cooperβs ruling βrecognized the spirit of the Hatch Act and its role in making sure that you donβt have government employees saying something that would be considered partisan.β
With OSC having primary responsibility to enforce the Hatch Act, legal experts are closely watching what happens next with the shutdown complaints.
If OSC finds a Hatch Act violation occurs, it can bring the case before the Merit Systems Protection Board. The penalties for a Hatch Act violation can include removal from federal service, a reduction in grade, debarment from federal employment for up to five years, suspension, reprimand or a civil penalty of up to $1,000.
But OSC itself has also been at the center of the Trump administrationβs efforts to rein in independent agencies. Trump earlier this year fired Special Counsel Hampton Dellinger with no explanation, drawing a short-lived legal battle.
And Trumpβs nominee to replace Dellinger recently withdrew from consideration after offensive text messages came to light.
Jamieson Greer, the United States Trade Representative, is currently dual-hatted as acting Special Counsel.
βIn the past, the Office of Special Counsel has been very thorough releasing opinions that give clear guidance on what activities are or are not violation of the Hatch Act,β Payne said. βBut weβre not clear whether or not this agency will do that this time.β
The post What happens next with shutdown Hatch Act complaints? first appeared on Federal News Network.

Β© Getty Images/iStockphoto/gorodenkoff
