• CoinDCX users now hold an average of five tokens, up from two to three previously.
• Women investors doubled year on year with broader diversification trends.
• Millennials remain the dominant user base as the average age rises to 32.

Indian crypto investors are showing a stronger preference for diversified digital asset portfolios, marking an early shift toward more deliberate and long-term allocation behaviour.

CoinDCX’s annual report, released on Thursday, suggests that the country’s retail investor base is gradually moving away from the idea that crypto is synonymous with Bitcoin, signalling broader maturity in market participation in 2025.

This trend reflects a market becoming more confident, curious, and willing to explore varied opportunities across the expanding digital ecosystem.

The exchange found that the average user now holds around five tokens, compared with two to three in 2022.

This steady expansion of holdings indicates a growing awareness of portfolio construction and a willingness to explore different parts of the crypto market beyond the most established assets.

Layer-1 tokens lead activity

CoinDCX reported that layer-1 assets accounted for 43.3% of portfolio volumes.

Bitcoin, priced at $93,133, held a 26.5% share of allocations. Memecoins made up 11.8% of user portfolios, showing that speculative interest remains a part of broader diversification trends.

According to the exchange, Indian traders have become increasingly comfortable navigating different digital asset categories as adoption widens across the country.

The report noted that crypto is emerging as a natural extension of the financial products already familiar to many users.

Millennials dominate participation

The platform’s user base is ageing upward, with the average trader now 32 years old. Millennials continue to make up the majority of users, outpacing Gen Z in adoption, though younger traders remain active.

Gen Z users, aged 18 to 24, tend to favour emerging narratives such as layer-2 ecosystems, memecoins, and non-fungible tokens. Their behaviour reflects a greater appetite for thematic or speculative sectors.

CoinDCX also saw its number of women investors double year on year. These users are diversifying beyond Bitcoin and Ether, priced at $3,183, into tokens such as Solana at $143.04 and Sui at $1.67.

Founded in 2018 and backed by Coinbase, CoinDCX is one of India’s largest crypto exchanges with more than 20 million registered users. It remains a key gateway for retail access to digital assets.

India shows wide but shallow adoption

CoinDCX noted that India continues to lead in early indicators of digital asset awareness, including mobile-first trading behaviour and high engagement across educational content on the platform.

These signals reflect strong nationwide interest in crypto as a financial category.

However, the exchange found that deeper, research-driven participation remains limited. Many users enter the market through popular assets or trending narratives rather than sustained ecosystem involvement.

As a result, the platform characterised India’s adoption as “wide” but not yet “deep”.

CoinDCX said the country is still in the early stages of its digital asset journey, leaving significant room for education, innovation, and long-term growth as user sophistication develops.

The post CoinDCX data reveals India’s rising appetite for diversified digital assets appeared first on CoinJournal.

According to reports, it has been three months since the Shibarium Bridge hack that drained more than $3 million from users, yet the case has not moved into formal law enforcement channels.

On-chain investigators traced a clear path of funds, and community members say the clues are strong enough to support an official probe. Still, exchanges are holding back unless a police case number is presented.

On-Chain Trail Revealed

Based on reports from on-chain sleuths, the attacker moved 260 Ether through Tornado Cash before routing 232.49 ETH to deposit addresses at KuCoin. The laundering path involved 111 wallets and 45 unique KuCoin deposits, according to a public breakdown by a community investigator known as Shima.

Shibarium Bridge hacker foolishly chose not to accept the K9 bounty – it’s finally time to share the investigation we’ve been working on… this is juicy

The hacker made one stupid mistake and it completely unravelled their Tornado Cash laundering.

That one mistake… pic.twitter.com/itxsXbbGSm

— Shima 島。 (@MRShimamoto) December 1, 2025

A small mistake — a single transfer of 0.0874 ETH — linked otherwise hidden wallets and allowed the investigator to map much of the operation. The tracing work was shared with the Shiba Inu ecosystem team so it could be used to press for recovery.

Why didn’t https://t.co/OoTvg1kraL call the police?

Why isn’t there a report to the appropriate authorities to get a case number?

Why have no law enforcement been involved in the https://t.co/OoTvg1kraL bridge hack? https://t.co/88Gdxi0rhh

— Pulse Digital (@CryptoPulse9) December 1, 2025

Practical Roadblocks To Recovery

Tracing crypto through mixers remains difficult, even when the ledger gives clues. Exchanges often need subpoena power, legal requests or a case number to share account details.

That requirement can leave strong on-chain leads stuck if a project does not file a police report. Community investigators can point the way, but many of the next steps depend on formal legal action and cross-border cooperation.

Exchange Action Hinges On Case Number

After Shima handed the findings to the project team, members of the community and teams such as K9 Finance stepped in. One representative, using the handle DeFi Turtle, reached out to KuCoin to ask that the exchange freeze the suspected funds.

KuCoin replied that it would require a formal law enforcement case number before taking such action, based on the messages that have circulated in community channels. Without a police report, the exchange said it could not legally provide internal records or lock the linked accounts.

Sleuth Offers Evidence To Victims

Faced with slow institutional movement, Shima has offered the full dataset, the mapping work and the methodology to victims and to any law enforcement body willing to act. Victims in different countries may need to lodge complaints locally to create the case numbers that exchanges demand.

Calls For Formal Complaints

Shane Cook, founder of Pulse Digital Marketing, questioned why the Shiba Inu team had not filed an official complaint despite the on-chain evidence. Reports show the team previously confirmed the breach and said it had contacted security firms including PeckShield and Hexens.

Cook’s criticism centers on the idea that technical analysis alone may not be enough; a legal filing is often required to make exchanges cooperate. The community now wonders whether the project prioritized reopening the bridge and repayment planning over pursuing legal routes.

Featured image from Hacked.com, chart from TradingView

• Lookonchain reported $436.5 million in USDC moved to Kraken.
• Project revenue fell to $27.3 million in November.
• Wallets still held over $855 million in stablecoins and $211 million in SOL.

Pump.fun’s internal fund activity has drawn intense scrutiny after pseudonymous co-founder Sapijiju challenged claims that the project cashed out more than $436 million in stablecoins.

The discussion began when blockchain analytics platform Lookonchain reported that wallets linked to the Solana memecoin launchpad had transferred large amounts of USDC to the crypto exchange Kraken.

The activity raised fears of selling pressure and uncertainty about how the project handled its reserves.

The story quickly spread across X, where users analysed the movement of funds, debated the project’s finances, and questioned the clarity of the explanations offered.

USDC flows tied to internal management

In an X post, Sapijiju said the transfers were part of Pump.fun’s treasury management process and were not sales.

The post said the USDC originated from the PUMP token’s initial coin offering and was moved between internal wallets to support the company’s runway and reinvestment plans.

The post also stated that Pump.fun had never worked with Circle.

Treasury management typically involves reorganising wallets, allocating capital, and preparing budgets, and does not always indicate selling or liquidation.

Lookonchain’s report said the transfers to Kraken had reached $436.5 million in USDC since mid-October.

The timing drew more attention because Pump.fun’s monthly revenue had fallen to $27.3 million in November, its first drop below $40 million since July, according to DefiLlama.

Despite the concerns, data from DefiLlama, Arkham, and Lookonchain showed that the Pump.fun-tagged wallet still held more than $855 million in stablecoins and $211 million in Solana SOL, which traded at $136.43.

Analysts and community respond

Nansen research analyst Nicolai Sondergaard interpreted the reported transfers as a sign that more selling could follow.

In contrast, EmberCN suggested the activity reflected institutional private placements of the PUMP token rather than active dumping.

The competing interpretations led to a broader review of the token’s performance and project structure.

CoinGecko data showed that PUMP traded at $0.002714, down 32% from its ICO price of $0.004 and almost 70% below its September high of $0.0085.

Currently, PUMP is trading at $0.002738, rising 6.9% in the past 24 hours.

The price movement added more tension to community discussions as users examined whether the treasury actions aligned with the token’s market conditions.

Across X, multiple posts highlighted the divide in sentiment.

Some users argued that the explanation raised more questions, pointing to inconsistencies and asking for clearer communication.

Others dismissed the statement entirely and linked the treasury activity to concerns about token performance and execution.

A separate group of users said Pump.fun had the right to manage its revenue, ICO proceeds, and reserves as it saw fit.

They described treasury movements as common practice after an ICO and said the main issue was whether USDC reserves properly backed the circulating supply.

Treasury structure becomes central issue

As more users examined the fund flows, the debate shifted from selling pressure to the broader structure of Pump.fun’s treasury.

The discussion focused on the scale of reserves, how the project organised its wallets, and whether the team provided enough visibility into its financial management.

The presence of more than $855 million in stablecoins indicated that large amounts of capital remained under project control, but users continued to question the timing, communication, and purpose behind the transfers.

The situation highlighted how treasury management can become a point of market sensitivity, especially when combined with falling revenue, volatile token prices, and community scepticism.

With attention across X still focused on the movements, the conversation has moved toward transparency expectations, reserve backing, and the company’s approach to supporting long-term development.

The post Pump fun treasury concerns rise as USDC transfers trigger community debate appeared first on CoinJournal.

Need to know what happened in crypto today? Here is the latest news on daily trends and events impacting Bitcoin price, blockchain, DeFi, NFTs, Web3 and crypto regulation.