❌

Reading view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.

Privacy Framework — A Modern, Data-Centric Approach for 2025

✇Checks & Controls
By: noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)
Privacy Framework — A Modern, Data-Centric Approach for 2025
PF

Privacy Framework — A Modern, Data-Centric Approach for 2025

Data-centric privacy readiness, ISMS alignment, regulatory coverage, consent, DPIA/PIA, incident response — with real-world governance lessons.

Introduction

In 2025, privacy is no longer just a compliance obligation—it has become a strategic differentiator, a board-level priority, and a resilience factor that impacts trust, brand value, and long-term sustainability. With expanding digital ecosystems, multi-jurisdictional regulations, AI-powered decision systems, and unprecedented levels of data movement across borders, enterprises today face a privacy landscape that is more complex and fast-shifting than ever before.

Action:

Start a privacy inventory project this quarter — list your top 3 data sources and assign owners for each.

A Privacy Framework offers structured guidance, governance, methodologies, and operational mechanisms to ensure that personal information is collected, used, stored, processed, and shared in ways that are lawful, ethical, secure, and aligned with customer expectations. In recent years, global events—including the major flight disruption at IndiGo in December 2025—have demonstrated how operational failures, weak governance, unclear communication, and gaps in risk planning can severely impact trust. Even though the IndiGo incident was not a data breach, it highlighted how misalignment between regulation, internal capability, and operational readiness can trigger nationwide chaos. A strong privacy and governance framework would mitigate similar chaos in environments where personal data is involved.

Action:

Map one major operational process to privacy impact — e.g., customer refunds, cancellations — and identify data points used.

Why Organizations Need a Privacy Framework in 2025

Digital transformation, cloud technologies, AI-driven analytics, mobile adoption, and outsourcing have created a massive influx of structured and unstructured personal data. Business expansion across countries brings multi-jurisdictional privacy obligations. Meanwhile, customers are increasingly conscious about how their data is used, monitored, shared, monetized, or profiled. Market perception is now directly tied to privacy posture.

Action:

Run a rapid stakeholder survey (customers, partners) to capture top 3 privacy concerns within 30 days.

A Privacy Framework helps organizations operationalize data protection principles, embed privacy in business processes, implement technical and organizational safeguards, and ensure accountability through structured roles, auditability, and governance. It ensures that privacy is not a one-time project but a living, evolving capability.

Action:

Document a privacy governance RACI: who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed for your top 5 data flows.

Key Service Areas

Below table converts the main service activities into a quick-reference tabular layout.

Action:

Choose one service area to pilot with a small cross-functional team for 60 days.

Service Area Key Activities Regulations Coverage Product Partners
Privacy Readiness
  • Privacy-by-Design
  • Privacy Maturity Assessment
  • Procedure Blueprinting
  • PIA / DPIA
  • Breach Response & Management
 GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, PDPA, PIPEDA, APP OneTrust BigID
PI Modelling & Mapping
  • Data Inventory
  • Data Flow Mapping
  • Data Modelling & Relationship
 GDPR, Sectoral Laws BigID
Data Subject Rights
  • DSAR Portal
  • Identity Validation
  • Individual Request Fulfilment
  • Records & Reporting
 GDPR, CCPA, PDPA, PIPEDA OneTrust
Consent & Cookie
  • Consent Categorisation
  • Consent Tracking & Revocation
  • Cookie Assessment & Scanning
 GDPR, CCPA, ePrivacy (where applicable) CookieScan
Platform Solutions
  • Platform Architecture & Blueprinting
  • Implementation & Integration
  • Monitoring Dashboards
  • AI Regulatory Analysis
 Depends on deployment region OneTrust Custom

Data-Centric View & Risk Landscape

Modern privacy management begins by understanding the data journey—collection, transformation, usage, storage, and archiving. This requires knowing data sources, processing activities, recipients, retention, and deletion flows.

Action:

Create a simple data-flow diagram for a single customer-facing process and keep it under 3 layers.

Typical data sources include CRM, customer services, retail systems, partner ecosystems, employee systems, and outsourcing providers. Each source adds complexity, and each requires controls mapped to legal and business obligations.

Action:

List top 5 external data partners and capture the legal basis or contract clause for data sharing with each.

Threats

Key ThreatsImpact
External & Internal AttacksData breach, reputational loss
Identity theftLegal, financial liabilities
RansomwareOperational paralysis

Drivers

DriverKey Factor
Regulatory ComplexityMulti-jurisdictional obligations
Market DemandPrivacy as competitive advantage
TechnologyAI, Cloud, IoT

SVG Infographic — Data-Centric Privacy

Data Sources Controls & Safeguards Governance Process • Policy • People Consumers Partners
Action:

Export this infographic as a PNG for stakeholder review and include it in your privacy charter deck.

Governance, Compliance & Case Study

A Privacy Framework must ensure governance, roles, monitoring, and auditability. It should include documented policies, periodic reviews, vendor oversight, and operational playbooks. Regulatory compliance alone is insufficient without implementation and continuous improvement.

Action:

Create a policy review calendar for the next 12 months and assign owners.

Real-world disruptions, like the IndiGo outage in December 2025, teach that failure modes are broader than cyberattacks. Operational or regulatory changes, poor communication, and lack of contingency planning can rapidly erode trust. The privacy parallel: a poorly handled data incident—slow notifications, confusing remediation, or no clear ownership—can cause similar reputational damage and regulatory exposure.

Action:

Draft a short incident communication template: what to say, whom to notify, and timelines for initial acknowledgement.

Issues & Challenges

Enterprises face practical hurdles that slow down privacy adoption. The table below summarises the most common challenges and suggested mitigation approaches.

Action:

Pick one challenge from the table and identify a low-cost pilot to address it within 45 days.

IssueWhy it mattersMitigation
Low awarenessEmployees and customers unaware of rights/risksTargeted training; short micro-modules
Growth vs PrivacyRevenue goals may override privacy controlsPrivacy risk scoring in product roadmap
Forced consentLegal & reputational riskDesign clear, granular consent flows
Data complexityHigh volumes, multiple formatsAutomated discovery & classification
Budget constraintsLimits tool adoption & peoplePhased tooling; focus on high-risk areas

The Way Forward

Adopt a data-centric and risk-based privacy strategy that combines strong governance, automated privacy operations, AI-enhanced compliance management, integrated incident response, transparent customer communication, comprehensive vendor oversight, scalable platform adoption, and continuous education.

Action:

Build a 90-day roadmap with milestones for governance, inventory, DSAR readiness, and one pilot automation.

The Privacy Framework must evolve with technology, regulation, and threats. It should be continuously measured, reviewed, and improved, and must be considered a strategic asset that enables business trust and sustainable growth.

Action:

Set up a monthly privacy KPI dashboard — include metrics like DSAR turnaround, PIA completion rate, and third-party control score.

Frequently Asked Questions (20)

Quick answers and guidance for executive and operational teams. The grid uses a 10x2 layout for clarity.

Action:

Select 5 FAQs relevant to your org and prepare short internal answers for stakeholder review.

1. What is a Privacy Framework?

A structured set of policies, processes, and controls to protect personal information across its lifecycle.

2. How does Privacy differ from Security?

Privacy focuses on lawful & ethical use of personal data; security provides the technical and operational safeguards.

3. What is PIA / DPIA?

Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) or Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) identifies privacy risks for projects/processes.

4. Which laws should global companies watch?

GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, PDPA, PIPEDA, APP and sectoral laws like HIPAA or GLBA.

5. What is Privacy-by-Design?

Embedding privacy into systems and processes from inception rather than as an afterthought.

6. How to handle DSARs efficiently?

Use portals, automation, identity validation, and standardized fulfilment workflows.

7. When is consent required?

Consent is required when processing lacks another valid legal basis or where explicit opt-in is mandated by law.

8. How often to review privacy policies?

At least annually, and whenever there is a significant product, legal, or operational change.

9. What role does AI play in privacy?

AI amplifies data processing risks and requires additional governance, explainability, and model monitoring.

10. How to prioritise privacy risks?

Use impact-likelihood scoring and focus on high-impact, high-likelihood scenarios first.

11. Is compliance enough?

No — compliance is a baseline. Operational readiness and culture are required for real protection.

12. How to manage third-party risk?

Contractual clauses, regular audits, data flow mapping, and continuous monitoring are essential.

13. What metrics track privacy health?

DSAR turnaround, PIA completion rate, incidents resolved, third-party control score, and training completion.

14. How to respond to a breach?

Follow your incident response plan: contain, assess, notify regulators & data subjects as required, remediate, and learn.

15. What is Data Minimization?

Collect only what is necessary and retain it no longer than required for the purpose.

16. How to handle cross-border transfers?

Use approved transfer mechanisms, SCCs, or ensure adequacy decisions where applicable.

17. Which tools help scale privacy?

OneTrust, BigID, Consent Management Platforms, DLP, and specialized DSAR tools.

18. How to integrate privacy in product dev?

Use privacy checklists, threat modelling, and mandatory PIAs for high-risk features.

19. How to train employees on privacy?

Micro-learning, role-based training, simulated DSAR exercises, and phishing/incident drills.

20. What is the ROI of privacy?

Reduced incident cost, improved customer trust, brand differentiation, and regulatory fines avoidance.

Built for: Privacy Framework review • Last updated: Dec 2025 • Designed by Hermit Crab

Keeping Security & GRC at the Forefront: Practical Guide

✇Checks & Controls
By: noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)
Keeping Security & GRC at the Forefront: Practical Guide

Keeping Security & GRC at the Forefront: Practical Guide

In today’s dynamic threat landscape — where cloud adoption, remote work, AI-driven attacks and stringent regulations are the norm — organisations must embed Security and GRC (Governance-Risk-Compliance) into every layer of business operations. This guide offers a comprehensive yet practical roadmap to help you design, deploy and sustain a resilient security posture combining rigorous governance, risk-based controls, and audit readiness.

Governance Risk Management Compliance Security Controls Monitoring & IR Culture & Awareness Integrated GRC + Security Framework

1. Governance as the Foundation

Governance defines the strategic framework for security and compliance — ensuring that every initiative aligns with business objectives, regulatory commitments, and corporate policy. It sets the tone from leadership downward, determining how risk is accepted, mitigated, or transferred, what standards apply, and who owns what. Without robust governance, even the best security tools and audit processes remain fragmented and ineffective.

A well-structured governance model codifies responsibilities for risk owners, compliance owners, control owners, and audit managers. This clarity ensures accountability, standardizes decision-making, and enables measurable control performance across the organization.

2. Risk Management — Proactive & Dynamic

Risk management helps organisations anticipate and prioritize threats rather than react to incidents after they happen. Modern risk management frameworks consider evolving factors — cloud adoption, supply-chain dependencies, third-party vendors, and the rapid rise of AI-powered threats — to evaluate what could go wrong, how likely it is, and how severe the impact would be.

Risk Management Life Cycle

StageDescription
Risk IdentificationSpot possible threats: cyber attacks, data leaks, vendor failures, regulatory fines.
Risk AnalysisAssess likelihood + impact (qualitative or quantitative).
Risk EvaluationCompare risks against organisational tolerance or risk appetite.
Risk TreatmentMitigate, transfer, accept, or avoid the risk via controls or process changes.
Continuous MonitoringTrack Key Risk Indicators (KRIs), re-evaluate after major changes (cloud, AI, vendor changes).

Embedding risk management into everyday operations — from project planning to technology adoption — helps organisations stay resilient. As new threats emerge (like AI-driven ransomware or supply-chain risks), a living risk register becomes the strategic asset.

3. Compliance That Builds Trust & Enables Growth

Compliance used to be viewed as a checkbox for audits, but in modern businesses it’s a competitive differentiator. Achieving and maintaining standards such as ISO 27001, GDPR/DPDP, PCI-DSS or SOC 2 enhances customer trust and unlocks new markets — especially when dealing with global clients.

A compliance program acts as a documented guarantee: employees follow defined processes, controls are regularly tested, and evidence is available for internal and external audits. This ensures organisations stay audit-ready, avoid penalties, and maintain credibility with partners and regulators.

Core Benefits of a Strong Compliance Program

BenefitWhy It Matters
Customer & Partner TrustClients share sensitive data only if compliance standards are demonstrable.
Operational DisciplineStandardized controls reduce human error and enforce consistent practices.
Regulatory ReadinessHelps adapt quickly to changing laws and cross-border regulations.
Market AdvantageCertifications strengthen proposals during tenders and vendor evaluations.

4. Security Controls — The Active Defense Layer

Security controls are the real-world mechanisms that protect data, infrastructure, and users — from on-prem servers to cloud workloads and remote endpoints. They form the active defense layer that complements risk assessments and compliance policies.

Categories of Security Controls

TypeDescriptionExamples
PreventiveStop threats before they happen.Firewalls, MFA, patch management, least privilege access
DetectiveDetect suspicious or malicious events in real-time.SIEM, IDS/IPS, log monitoring, anomaly detection
Corrective / RecoverRespond and recover from incidents or control failures.Backups, disaster recovery, incident response plans

In 2025 and beyond, many organizations are integrating **AI-driven security tools**, behavioral analytics, and automated detection — combining human oversight with machine speed to defend against advanced threats. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

5. Continuous Monitoring & Incident Response — Always On

Threats evolve rapidly. Cloud misconfigurations, AI-powered malware, supply-chain compromises – these don’t wait for quarterly audits. Continuous monitoring ensures that you have real-time visibility into system health, deviations, or suspicious activities, enabling quick response and mitigation.

A well-defined Incident Response Plan (IRP) ensures clear roles, escalation paths, communication protocols and recovery procedures. Post-incident reviews feed back into risk management, compliance updates, and controls refinement — creating a feedback loop that improves cyber resilience over time.

6. People, Culture & Awareness — The Human Firewall

Even the most advanced tools and controls fail if users are unaware, untrained, or complacent. A strong security culture transforms security from a top-down mandate into a shared team responsibility.

Awareness programs, phishing simulations, regular training, and embedding security in everyday workflows makes compliance and risk-based controls part of the organizational DNA. This reduces human error, insider risks, and strengthens overall resilience.

Conclusion

Building a comprehensive GRC and security program isn’t just about ticking boxes — it’s about embedding resilience into your organization’s DNA. By combining strong governance, dynamic risk management, compliance, security controls, continuous monitoring, and a security-first culture, you build robust cyber resilience. In a world where cloud, remote operations, AI-driven threats, and evolving regulations define the landscape, this integrated approach becomes the backbone of sustainable business growth.

Start today: map your critical assets, classify risk levels, assign control owners, and define basic security & compliance processes. Even small steps taken consistently are better than large efforts done occasionally.

Frequently Asked Questions – Security & GRC
1. What does “Keeping Security & GRC at the forefront” actually mean? It means designing every business process with security and governance controls embedded from Day 1 to reduce risks, improve compliance, and strengthen decision-making.
2. Why is GRC important for modern organizations? GRC ensures consistent governance, reduces compliance violations, aligns risk with business goals, and protects the brand reputation.
3. What is the role of continuous monitoring in GRC? It provides real-time visibility into threats, control failures, policy deviations, and compliance gaps for faster decisions.
4. How does automation help in GRC? Automation reduces manual audits, eliminates data entry errors, accelerates risk assessments, and improves control reporting accuracy.
5. What frameworks support strong GRC programs? ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST CSF, SOC 2, COBIT, and GDPR form the backbone of most corporate governance structures.
6. How does GRC support cyber-resilience? GRC integrates risk management, incident response, disaster recovery and ensures organizations remain operational during cyber events.
7. What is the difference between Governance and Compliance? Governance defines ‘how decisions are made’; compliance ensures those decisions follow internal policies and external laws.
8. Why is risk assessment so important? Risk assessment identifies vulnerabilities, attack surfaces, and business impacts, enabling prioritization of controls and budget.
9. How does AI enhance GRC? AI improves anomaly detection, accelerates audits, automates documentation, and predicts risks using behavioural analytics.
10. What is the significance of internal audits? Internal audits validate control effectiveness, ensure policy adherence, and prepare organizations for external certification audits.
11. Why should security posture be continuously updated? Threats evolve daily, so updating controls, patching systems, and reviewing risks ensures organizations stay protected.
12. What final steps ensure long-term GRC maturity? Regular audits, policy refresh cycles, leadership reporting, business continuity planning, and culture training maintain maturity.

LLMエージェントと人間の協調設計──どこまで任せ、どこで介入すべきか

✇CIO

人間の役割を前提にしたエージェント設計

まず大前提として、LLMエージェントは人間の代わりではなく、あくまで協働パートナーとして設計されるべきです。人間の強みは、価値判断や責任の負担、組織や個人の文脈を踏まえた意思決定にあります。逆にエージェントの強みは、情報の探索と整理、繰り返し作業の高速処理、多数の選択肢の検討といった部分です。どちらか一方に全面的に寄せるのではなく、長所の組み合わせを意識することが重要です。

そのためには、まず対象となる業務を分解し、「判断が重いステップ」と「事務的なステップ」を見極める必要があります。たとえば、顧客クレームへの対応であれば、事実関係の整理や過去ケースの検索、文面のドラフト作成などはエージェントに任せやすい領域です。一方で、無償対応の範囲をどこまで認めるか、今後の関係性への影響をどう考えるかといった判断は、人間に残すべき領域になります。

エージェント設計では、こうした業務分解の結果を踏まえ、「エージェントが自律的に完結してよい範囲」「必ず人間の承認を要する範囲」「人間の判断のために情報整理だけ行う範囲」という三つのゾーンを明確に定義します。そのうえで、各ゾーンごとにエージェントの権限とインターフェースを調整することで、協調の前提が整っていきます。

介入ポイントと「ハンドル」のデザイン

人間とエージェントの協調をうまく機能させるには、人間側から見て「いつでも介入できる」という感覚が重要です。一度エージェントに仕事を渡したら最後、内部で何が起きているか分からず、誤った結果だけが突然返ってくるという状態では、ユーザーは安心して任せることができません。

そこで鍵になるのが、介入ポイントとハンドルのデザインです。介入ポイントとは、ワークフローの中で人間が必ず確認や承認を行うステップのことであり、ハンドルとは人間がエージェントの振る舞いを調整するための操作手段です。具体的には、エージェントが提案したプランを一覧で表示し、ユーザーに「採用」「修正」「却下」を選ばせる画面や、エージェントが作成したドラフトを編集するエディタ、処理を途中で止める停止ボタンなどが該当します。

さらに、エージェントがどのように考えて行動したのかを、ユーザーに分かりやすく提示することも重要です。エージェントの内部で起きている推論プロセスを完全に可視化することは難しいにしても、「まず過去三ヶ月のデータを集計し、その結果をもとに二つの案を比較した」といった簡潔な説明を添えるだけで、ユーザーの安心感は大きく変わります。このような「思考過程の外在化」は、人間の同僚が報告するときの作法に近く、エージェントをチームの一員として扱う感覚を育てます。

信頼を育てるユーザー体験と「手放し運転」の範囲

協調設計のゴールは、ユーザーがエージェントを徐々に信頼し、適切な範囲で「手放し運転」を許容できる状態を作ることです。ここで重要なのは、最初から高い自律性を与えるのではなく、段階的に信頼を積み重ねることです。

初期段階では、エージェントに「提案」や「ドラフト」だけを任せ、最終決定は必ず人間が行う形が望ましいでしょう。このフェーズでは、エージェントの提案がどれだけ有用か、どの程度の頻度で修正が必要かを観察し、ユーザー自身もエージェントとの付き合い方を学んでいきます。この過程で、「この種類の仕事ならば、エージェントに任せても大丈夫そうだ」という感覚が少しずつ育っていきます。

次の段階では、リスクの低い領域から自動実行の範囲を広げていきます。たとえば、内部向けの週次レポートの更新や、定型的なリマインドメールの送信などは、自動化しやすい領域です。一方で、対外的なコミュニケーションや契約関連の処理などは、長く人間のレビューが必要な領域として残るかもしれません。組織として「どのレベルのリスクならエージェントに任せてよいか」という方針を共有し、それに沿って権限設定を行うことが、健全な信頼関係の前提になります。

最終的には、ユーザー体験そのものが、エージェントへの信頼に大きな影響を与えます。誤りが起きたときに、どれだけ素早く原因を特定し、修正できるか。ユーザーが「この結果はおかしい」と感じたとき、ワンクリックで人間の担当者に切り替えられるか。そうした「失敗への備え」が整っているほど、ユーザーは安心してエージェントに仕事を任せることができます。人間とエージェントの協調設計とは、単に役割分担を決めるだけではなく、信頼が徐々に醸成されるユーザー体験の流れ全体をデザインする営みでもあります。

Data Privacy Services Powered by Privacy Ops: Achieving Global Compliance

✇Checks & Controls
By: noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)
Data Privacy Services Powered by Privacy Ops: Achieving Global Compliance

Data Privacy Services Powered by Privacy Ops

Achieving Global Compliance Through Automation and AI

Title & Introduction

The modern digital ecosystem demands more than mere compliance; it requires operationalized data privacy. The shift from ad-hoc responses to a systematic **Privacy Operations (Privacy Ops)** framework is essential for organizations dealing with vast amounts of personal information (PI). Privacy Ops integrates people, processes, and technology to manage privacy risks continuously and automatically, transforming the burden of compliance into a strategic asset. With the proliferation of regulations like GDPR, CCPA, and LGPD, manual systems are obsolete, making AI-driven, platform-enabled services the only sustainable path forward.

This article explores a comprehensive Privacy Ops solution, detailing its features, service offerings, and its ability to seamlessly manage global regulatory coverage through automation and integrated data management.

Core Service Features: The Power of Automation

A successful Privacy Ops framework is defined by its ability to reduce human error and scale quickly. The core features leverage technology to automate complex, high-volume tasks, significantly lowering **low people dependency**.

AI-Powered Regulatory Analysis

An **AI powered bot for regulatory obligations analysis** instantly scans changes in global laws. By partnering with **UCF (Unified Compliance Framework) for authority sources**, the platform ensures that compliance requirements are current and accurate, eliminating the manual effort required to track evolving privacy standards.

Unified Data Integration

Handling diverse data environments is crucial. The platform supports **50+ data stores integrated through API**, ensuring a holistic view of all personal information assets. This unified approach facilitates accurate Data Inventory and **Data flow mapping** for comprehensive PI Modelling.

Monitoring & Reporting

The system provides **Automated track and monitor status**, displayed via **Interactive and dynamic dashboards**. These dashboards offer real-time insights into compliance metrics, risk levels, and the status of **Data Subject Rights Management (DSRM)** requests, allowing for proactive intervention.

Beyond these, the offering includes **Customised templates**, website **scan**, full **consent management & reporting**, making the entire compliance lifecycle platform enabled and highly streamlined.

Holistic Service Offerings and Global Coverage

The service architecture addresses the entire privacy spectrum, from proactive readiness to reactive breach management, covering major global laws.

1. Privacy Readiness & Impact Assessment

This is the proactive phase. Services include establishing a culture of **Privacy by Design**, performing **Privacy Maturity Assessment & Procedure blueprinting**. Crucially, it manages **Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)** and **Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA)** processes, which are mandatory under regulations like GDPR. Finally, a robust **Breach Response & Management** protocol is established for rapid and compliant incident handling.

2. Data Subject Rights Management (DSRM)

Managing the rights of data subjects (like access, erasure, and portability) is a major operational challenge under regulations like CCPA and GDPR. The solution provides a dedicated **Data Subject Access rights portal for intake**, implements **Data subject identity validation**, ensures **Individual Request Fulfillment**, and maintains necessary **Records & Reporting** for audit purposes.

3. Consent & Cookie Compliance

Modern compliance requires granular control over user consent. This service handles **Consent categorization and status**, along with **Consent tracking and fulfilment**. It includes **Cookies Assessment & Implementation** and continuous **Consent & Website Scanning** to ensure ongoing legal adherence to cookie policies globally.

4. Global Regulatory Coverage

The complexity of compliance is minimized by covering a wide range of mandates, including:

  • EU-General Data Protection Regulation (**GDPR**)
  • California Consumer Privacy Act (**CCPA**), US
  • Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (**LGPD**), Brazil
  • Australian Privacy Principles (**APP**)
  • Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (**PIPEDA**), Canada
  • Personal Data Protection Act (**PDPA**), Singapore

This wide coverage, supported by product partners like **OneTrust** and **BigID**, ensures a single, harmonized approach to multiple regulatory challenges.

Visual Diagram: Privacy Ops Flow

The successful implementation of Privacy Ops follows a continuous loop, driven by data ingestion and AI analysis, leading to automated controls and feedback.

Data Ingestion AI Regulatory Analysis & PI Mapping Automated DSRM & Consent Dashboards & Continuous Monitoring

Exam-Oriented Tips

For certification exams in privacy and data protection, focus on the operational aspects and key regulatory instruments:

Mastering Acronyms and Scope

  • **DPIA vs. PIA:** Understand the specific triggers for a Data Protection Impact Assessment (GDPR) and the broader Privacy Impact Assessment (general best practice).
  • **DSRM (Data Subject Rights Management):** Focus on the 7-step process—from intake via portal to final fulfillment and record-keeping.
  • **Key Global Laws:** Memorize the scope and core rights provided by **GDPR, CCPA, and LGPD**, as they are frequently compared in scenario-based questions.
  • **Privacy by Design:** Know the 7 foundational principles, especially the proactive and preventative nature of the approach.

Practice questions involving data flow mapping and determining compliance requirements when data crosses international boundaries (e.g., EU data processed in Singapore).

FAQ (Markdown)

**Q1: What is the primary role of the AI-powered bot?**

A1: The AI bot analyzes regulatory updates and obligations from sources like UCF to ensure real-time compliance tracking.

**Q2: How does the platform handle global regulations?**

A2: It provides harmonized controls covering major laws including GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, PIPEDA, and PDPA, allowing for central management.

**Q3: What are the key steps in Data Subject Rights Management?**

A3: Intake via a dedicated portal, identity validation, fulfillment of the request (e.g., erasure), and maintaining audit records and reporting.

**Q4: What is the purpose of Data Flow Mapping?**

A4: To identify where personal data is collected, stored, processed, and shared (data inventory and relationship) across the 50+ integrated data stores.

**Q5: What is 'Privacy by Design'?**

A5: A proactive approach ensuring privacy and security are built into the system architecture and business processes from the start, not added later.

FAQ: Visual Summary

Q1: Primary role of the AI-powered bot? A1: Analyzes regulatory updates from UCF for real-time tracking. Q2: How does the platform handle global regulations? A2: Harmonized controls covering GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, PIPEDA, and PDPA. Q3: Key steps in Data Subject Rights Management? A3: Intake via portal, identity validation, request fulfillment, and audit records. Q4: Purpose of Data Flow Mapping? A4: To identify where PI is collected, stored, processed, and shared (Data Inventory). Q5: What is 'Privacy by Design'? A5: Proactive approach: privacy and security are built into the architecture from the start.

© 2025 TheControlCheck. All rights reserved.

Audit Management: From Opening Meeting to Closure

✇Checks & Controls
By: noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)
Audit Management: From Opening Meeting to Closure

Audit Management: From Opening Meeting to Closure

Introduction to Auditing

Auditing is a systematic and independent examination of processes, systems, or organizations to ensure compliance with established standards. A structured audit helps organizations identify gaps, mitigate risks, and promote continual improvement.

Auditing Principles & Benefits

Ethical Conduct, Fair Presentation, Due Professional Care Verified conformity, increases awareness & understanding Independence & Evidence-Based Approach Reduces risks & identifies improvement opportunities Continuous Improvement Performed regularly ensures system effectiveness

Process Approach in Auditing

Auditors can apply the process approach by ensuring the auditee:

  • Defines objectives, inputs, outputs, activities, and resources for processes
  • Analyses, monitors, measures, and improves processes
  • Understands sequence and interaction of its processes
Individual Process Input/Output, PDCA, Resources Relationship with Other Processes Flow, Interaction, Evidence, Contracts

Managing an Audit Program

Effective audit programs include planning, scheduling, and resource allocation. A well-managed program ensures audits are systematic, consistent, and align with organizational objectives.

Audit Activities

  • Opening Meeting
  • Document Review
  • On-Site Audit / Observation
  • Interviews & Evidence Collection
  • Closing Meeting

Auditor Competence & Responsibilities

Auditors must possess:

  • Knowledge of standards & regulations
  • Analytical and communication skills
  • Objectivity and ethical conduct
  • Ability to report findings accurately

Key Take Aways

Audit management is often perceived merely as a regulatory necessity, but in reality, it is a cornerstone of organizational health and strategic growth. While compliance with standards—whether ISO 27001, ISO 9001, or internal policies—is the baseline, the true value of a robust audit management system lies in its ability to transform raw data into actionable business intelligence. A systematic approach to auditing does not just verify if rules are being followed; it evaluates whether those rules are actually helping the organization achieve its objectives.

The Strategic Value of Audit Management

Audit management is often perceived merely as a regulatory necessity, but in reality, it is a cornerstone of organizational health and strategic growth. While compliance with standards—whether ISO 27001, ISO 9001, or internal policies—is the baseline, the true value of a robust audit management system lies in its ability to transform raw data into actionable business intelligence.

The Lifecycle: From Opening to Closure

The journey from the opening meeting to the closing meeting is where the integrity of the audit is established. This structured lifecycle ensures that there are no surprises and that the audit concludes with a clear roadmap for the future.

Risk Mitigation and Proactive Defense

In today’s volatile digital landscape, waiting for a breach or a failure to occur is not an option. Audit management serves as an organization’s "early warning system." By systematically reviewing controls and processes, auditors identify vulnerabilities and latent risks that might otherwise go unnoticed until they cause significant damage.

Key Insight: Effective audit management shifts an organization’s posture from reactive to proactive. Instead of scrambling to fix issues after a regulatory fine, the audit process highlights weak control environments early.

Driving Continuous Improvement

Perhaps the most critical aspect of audit management is its contribution to Continuous Improvement (CI). An audit that ends with a report filing is a wasted opportunity. By identifying non-conformities and opportunities for improvement (OFIs), audits force organizations to analyze the root causes of their problems, moving away from temporary "band-aid" fixes toward sustainable solutions.

Audit Activities Checklist

  • Opening Meeting: Confirm scope, criteria, and plan.
  • Document Review: Verify documented information against standards.
  • On-Site Audit: Observe processes and interview staff.
  • Evidence Collection: Gather objective evidence (records, logs).
  • Closing Meeting: Present findings and agree on timeline.

FAQ: Visual Summary

Q1: What is Audit Management? A1: Systematic examination from opening meeting to closure ensuring compliance. Q2: What is Process Approach in Auditing? A2: Ensures objectives, inputs, outputs, and interactions are clearly defined. Q3: What are auditor responsibilities? A3: Knowledge, ethics, analytical skills, and accurate reporting of findings. Q4: What activities are included? A4: Opening meeting, document review, observation, interviews, closing meeting.

© 2025 TheControlCheck. All rights reserved.

Overview of ISO/IEC 27001:2013 vs 2022

✇Checks & Controls
By: noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)
Overview of ISO/IEC 27001:2013 vs 2022

Overview of ISO/IEC 27001:2013 vs 2022

Introduction

ISO/IEC 27001 is the global standard for Information Security Management Systems (ISMS). The 2022 revision introduces updates aligning with evolving cybersecurity threats, risk management practices, and digital transformation requirements. Understanding the differences between the 2013 and 2022 versions is critical for professionals preparing for audits or certification exams.

Overview of ISO/IEC 27001:2013 vs 2022

The 2013 version focused on 14 control domains and 114 controls under Annex A. The 2022 version streamlined these into 4 categories with 93 updated controls, emphasizing a risk-based approach, organizational context, and alignment with modern technology practices.

  • 2013: 14 control domains, 114 controls
  • 2022: 4 control categories, 93 controls
  • New focus on cloud security, privacy, and remote work risk management
  • Integration with other management systems (ISO 22301, ISO 9001)

Core Clauses and Annex Controls

Both versions follow a high-level structure (Annex SL), but the 2022 update introduces:

  1. Context of the organization
  2. Leadership & commitment
  3. Planning and risk assessment
  4. Support & awareness
  5. Operation and performance evaluation
  6. Improvement

Annex controls are now grouped under 4 categories:

  • Organizational
  • People
  • Physical
  • Technological

ISMS Process: Step-by-Step

Implementing an ISMS involves several systematic steps:

  1. Define the scope of ISMS
  2. Establish an information security policy
  3. Perform risk assessment & treatment planning
  4. Implement controls
  5. Monitor, measure, and evaluate effectiveness
  6. Conduct internal audits and management review
  7. Continual improvement based on findings

Awareness & Training

Awareness programs and training sessions are essential to:

  • Ensure all employees understand security policies
  • Align roles & responsibilities
  • Promote a security-first culture
  • Prepare for internal & external audits

Exam-Oriented Tips

Key points for ISO/IEC 27001 exams:

  • Focus on differences between 2013 vs 2022
  • Memorize the 4 main control categories and 93 controls (2022)
  • Understand ISMS PDCA cycle steps
  • Prepare for scenario-based questions on risk treatment and audit findings
  • Be familiar with Annex SL high-level structure

Visual Diagram: ISMS Process Overview

ISMS Scope & Policy Risk Assessment & Treatment Implement Controls Monitor & Improve

FAQ: Visual Overview

Q1: Differences between ISO/IEC 27001:2013 & 2022? A1: 2022 reduces controls to 93 & groups into 4 categories. Q2: How many clauses in both versions? A2: Both follow Annex SL with 10 clauses (context, leadership, planning, etc.) Q3: What is the PDCA cycle? A3: Plan → Do → Check → Act; ensures continuous improvement. Q4: How to prepare for ISO/IEC 27001 exam? A4: Focus on clauses, controls, ISMS process & scenario-based questions. Q5: Are 2013 controls still valid? A5: Mapped to 2022; transition based on risk assessment & updated controls.

© 2025 TheControlCheck. All rights reserved.

What Is GRC, and How AI Governance Is Transforming It in 2026

✇Checks & Controls
By: noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)

What Is GRC and How AI Governance Is Transforming It in 2026

The world of Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) is evolving faster than ever. With enterprises adopting AI-powered tools across all departments, organisations are realising that effective AI governance is no longer optional. It is now a core pillar of modern GRC.

This article explains what GRC means today, how AI governance fits inside GRC, the global frameworks shaping AI adoption, the maturity models, the Responsible AI skills companies expect, and why mastering AI governance creates a competitive advantage for professionals entering or growing in GRC.

1. What Is GRC? (Simple Definition)

GRC stands for Governance, Risk, and Compliance. It is a structured approach that ensures an organization:

  • Governance: Makes decisions responsibly and ethically
  • Risk Management: Identifies, assesses, and reduces risks
  • Compliance: Meets laws, standards, and regulatory requirements

In 2026, GRC is no longer just about audits or documentation. It is a strategic capability that helps companies scale, respond to cyber threats, maintain trust, and prevent legal problems.

Traditional GRC Pillars

  • Policies & Governance Models
  • Risk Management Frameworks
  • Compliance Requirements
  • Internal Controls & Testing
  • Audit Management
  • Reporting & Continuous Monitoring

2. Why AI Governance Is Becoming the Heart of GRC

AI systems now influence major business decisions across finance, HR, cybersecurity, fraud detection, privacy, and more. Because AI models can make mistakes, show bias, or act unpredictably, companies need clear processes to govern them.

AI Governance means:

  • Ensuring AI is used ethically and responsibly
  • Managing AI-specific risks (bias, drift, transparency)
  • Protecting privacy and sensitive data
  • Building explainable and trustworthy AI models
  • Implementing continuous monitoring and audits

In simple words: AI Governance adds a new risk category → “AI Risk”.

3. Global AI Governance Standards and Frameworks

AI governance is becoming increasingly standardized. These are the most influential frameworks globally:

1. ISO/IEC 42001:2023 – AI Management System (AIMS)

The world’s first certifiable AI governance standard. It focuses on:

  • AI risk management
  • AI lifecycle controls
  • Transparency and accountability
  • Model and data governance
  • Ethical requirements

2. NIST AI Risk Management Framework

Includes four core functions:

  • Govern
  • Map
  • Measure
  • Manage

3. EU AI Act

The strongest AI regulation, classifying AI into:

  • Unacceptable risk
  • High risk
  • Limited risk
  • Minimal risk

4. OECD AI Principles

Focus on fairness, human-centered design, transparency, and accountability.

5. India’s Emerging AI Governance Approach

India is steadily moving toward Responsible AI policies aligned with global frameworks.

4. AI Governance Adoption Approach

Organizations follow a structured approach when integrating AI governance:

  1. Establish governance structure: AI committees, ethics boards
  2. Identify AI use cases: especially high-risk systems
  3. Perform AI risk assessments: data, model, fairness, privacy
  4. Implement Responsible AI controls: explainability, bias checks
  5. Continuous monitoring: real-time model behavior tracking
  6. Compliance alignment: ISO 42001, NIST, EU AI Act, DPDP

5. Responsible AI Training – A Mandatory Skill

Companies now require employees to complete:

  • Responsible AI training
  • Bias detection & prevention courses
  • AI risk assessment workshops
  • Privacy & data protection training

This makes AI safer, fair, and accountable—and increases the value of GRC professionals.

6. AI Governance Maturity Assessment

Organizations measure their AI readiness through the following levels:

  • Level 1 – Initial: No structure; ad-hoc AI use
  • Level 2 – Repeatable: Basic AI policies
  • Level 3 – Defined: Governance framework established
  • Level 4 – Managed: Formal monitoring and AI audits
  • Level 5 – Optimized: Fully integrated AI governance

Most organizations in 2026 fall between Level 2 and 3.

7. Why AI Governance Matters for Your GRC Career

AI governance is the fastest-growing discipline within GRC. Here’s why:

  • New AI regulations require expert interpreters
  • AI introduces new risk categories
  • AI audits are becoming mandatory
  • There is a huge skill gap in the industry
  • AI governance intersects with all GRC functions

Learning AI governance immediately boosts long-term career value.

8. Key Takeaways

  • AI governance is transforming modern GRC
  • ISO 42001 and NIST are leading global frameworks
  • Responsible AI is now a requirement
  • AI maturity models help organizations evolve
  • Professionals with AI governance knowledge are in high demand

FAQs

## FAQs 

### **Q1. What is the main purpose of AI governance?**
To ensure AI systems are safe, ethical, transparent, and compliant across their lifecycle.

### **Q2. Is AI governance part of GRC?**
Yes. It introduces a new category called “AI Risk” under governance, risk management, compliance, and audit.

### **Q3. Which global AI standard is considered the most important?**
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is the most robust, globally recognized AI governance standard.

### **Q4. Does AI governance require coding skills?**
No. Not necessary. Most GRC professionals focus on documentation, risks, controls, assessments, and audits.

### **Q5. Why is AI governance important for GRC careers?**
Because regulatory pressure is increasing and organizations need professionals who understand AI risks, compliance, and ethical standards.

### **Q6. Which industries require AI governance experts?**
Banking, telecom, healthcare, e-commerce, manufacturing, consulting, and government sectors.

Amdocs Helps Telcos Succeed in Transformation by Combining AI, Telco-Centric Platforms, and Services Focused on Experience

✇IT Connection
By: siowmeng
S. Soh

Summary Bullets:

  • Telecom companies are facing many challenges moving beyond their legacy business and adopting digital solutions including AI to drive business transformation.
  • Amdocs is helping telcos to drive transformation with AI and its consulting-led services play a key role to accelerate the process from customer engagement to backend operations.

Telecommunications companies (telcos) are in various stages of transforming their businesses. The industry as a whole faces several challenges that have hindered progress.

These include regulations (e.g., to meet quality of service, data privacy, consumer protection, etc.); the need to constantly invest in their networks (e.g., upgrading mobile networks to 5G and 5G-A), legacy systems, and processes (including IT, network, and operations support system); and growing competitive pressures from traditional competitors to new telco start-ups and disruptive players (e.g., over-the-top providers, cloud providers, LEO satellite companies, etc.). They also have a huge workforce that may not be ready to transition into new technology areas such as AI, data science, cybersecurity, and cloud computing. While telcos’ leadership teams are well aware of the opportunities of emerging technologies, they have to take a more holistic approach in transforming the business, not just adding new digital capabilities. They need to reimagine their business (i.e., define the core business and operating model), right-size the organization with the right talent, adjust the company culture, and ensure effective change management.

This means opportunities for technology services providers including consulting firms, systems integrators, and other telco vendor partners to help telcos modernize their technology and transform their business. Amdocs is a key player within the telco partner ecosystem. It already serves 350 communications and media providers across more than 85 countries, including many tier-1 telcos (e.g., AT&T, BT, Telefonica, and Globe) with long-standing relationships. The company offers a range of products for catalog management, commerce and customer care, billing/monetization, network deployment and optimization, service & network automation, and more. Amdocs has also embedded AI (including GenAI and agentic AI) into its solutions. For example, its customer engagement platform is a customer relationship management (CRM) solution to deliver AI-driven customer journeys and personalized services serving both consumer and B2B customers. This is developed in partnership with Microsoft, leveraging Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Microsoft Azure, verticalized for telecoms by Amdocs. Amdocs amAIz suite lays the foundation for telco data management, AI control and governance, and AI application and AI agent deployment. More importantly, since Amdocs is already embedded in telcos’ operations, the company has a deep understanding of the telco business and operational requirements. This places the company in a better position to help telcos adopt AI, particularly agentic AI, to automate workflows (from IT operations to business operations and network operations) to deliver the desired business outcomes.

However, due to the aforementioned challenges, many telcos are facing in transforming their business: They are not merely looking for more technologies but partners that can help them drive business outcomes. Many technology vendors choose to partner with service providers to help telcos close their capability gaps, recognizing the need to work across technologies from different vendors, which may require systems integration. Amdocs has taken a different approach by building a more comprehensive set of services to support telco customers, which it can also extend to customers in more verticals over time. Besides services to support network management and operations, the company is also helping telcos to transform various aspects of their business from CX to the modernization of backend systems. This is through Amdocs Studios, which has broad expertise across cloud services (e.g., strategy, migration, and operations), data and AI (e.g., data strategy, AI & analytics, and GenAI), and consulting services (e.g., experience design, product development, cybersecurity, and risk management). Amdocs is developing agentic services to support operational aspects of the Amdocs Studios’ main practices, including application modernization, data modernization, quality engineering, and more. The company has an extensive partner ecosystem to deliver the right outcomes for customers. For example, it has strategic partnerships with AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Oracle, and Red Hat to offer cloud services.

Consulting services in particular are crucial in aligning technologies with business outcomes and helping drive change especially in using cloud, data, and AI to improve customer experience, employee experience, and operations experience (the processes involved to facilitate the interaction between a customer and a brand). Successful implementation will require enterprises to focus on the experiences they want to deliver and the brand image they want to establish. In particular, a human-centered design is crucial especially in AI initiatives to promote trust and focus on the benefits to enhance human capabilities (not to replace them).

Amdocs has invested significantly to develop experience design capabilities, which will be pivotal to compete with other service providers. Some global systems integrators also have strong creative design consulting capabilities (e.g., Accenture Song, Deloitte Digital, and TCS Interactive). As businesses are adopting digital solutions to drive business and operational changes, it is imperative for service providers to have an industry-focused approach for their go-to-market. This is already the case for most global systems integrators. While Amdocs does not have the scale of some of the largest global systems integrators, it has deep expertise in the telco sector. However, the company will continue to face stiff competition from systems integrators, especially Accenture, Infosys, and HCLTech, which have made acquisitions, high-profile customer examples, and extensive partnerships with vendors important to telcos.

Resops: Turning AI disruption into business momentum

✇CIO

The world has changed — artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping business faster than most can adapt


The rise of large language models and agentic AI has created unprecedented scale, speed, and complexity. Enterprises are moving from static infrastructures to hyperplexed, distributed, and autonomous systems. Organizations are pouring more than $400 billion into AI infrastructure, a wave expected to generate more than $2 trillion in new value. But without resilience at the core, that value remains at risk.

As innovation accelerates, new risks emerge just as quickly. Security is lagging behind transformation. Data is exploding, with nearly 40% year-over-year growth across hybrid and multicloud environments. Regulations are tightening, and ransomware and AI-powered attacks are multiplying. The result: Resilience now defines competitive advantage.

Resilience drives velocity

Resilience isn’t just recovery. It’s also the foundation of sustained innovation. Traditional recovery models were built for yesterday’s outages, not today’s AI-driven disruptions, which unfold in milliseconds. In this world, recovery is table stakes. True resilience means that every system runs on clean, verifiable data, and it restores trust when it’s tested.

The most resilient organizations are also the fastest movers. They adopt emerging technologies with confidence, recover with speed and integrity, and innovate at scale. Resilience has evolved from a safety net to the engine of enterprise speed and scalability.

Introducing resops, the model for next-generation resilience

Resops, short for resilience operations, is an operating model that unifies data protection, cyber recovery, and governance into a single intelligent system. It creates an ongoing loop that monitors, validates, and protects data across hybrid and multicloud environments, enabling organizations to detect risks early and recover with confidence.

By integrating resilience into every layer of operations, resops transforms it from an isolated function into a proactive discipline — one that keeps businesses secure, compliant, and ready to adapt in the AI era.

To learn more about ResOps, read “ResOps: The future of resilient business in the era of AI.” 

Vertical AI development agents are the future of enterprise integrations

✇CIO

Enterprise Application Integration (EAI) and modern iPaaS platforms have become two of the most strategically important – and resource-constrained – functions inside today’s enterprises. As organizations scale SaaS adoption, modernize core systems, and automate cross-functional workflows, integration teams face mounting pressure to deliver faster while upholding strict architectural, data quality, and governance standards.

AI has entered this environment with the promise of acceleration. But CIOs are discovering a critical truth:

Not all AI is built for the complexity of enterprise integrations – whether in traditional EAI stacks or modern iPaaS environments.

Generic coding assistants such as Cursor or Claude Code can boost individual productivity, but they struggle with the pattern-heavy, compliance-driven reality of integration engineering. What looks impressive in a demo often breaks down under real-world EAI/iPaaS conditions.

This widening gap has led to the rise of a new category: Vertical AI Development Agents – domain-trained agents purpose-built for integration and middleware development. Companies like CurieTech AI are demonstrating that specialized agents deliver not just speed, but materially higher accuracy, higher-quality outputs, and far better governance than general-purpose tools.

For CIOs running mission-critical integration programs, that difference directly affects reliability, delivery velocity, and ROI.

Why EAI and iPaaS integrations are not a “Generic Coding” problem

Integrations—whether built on legacy middleware or modern iPaaS platforms – operate within a rigid architectural framework:

  • multi-step orchestration, sequencing, and idempotency
  • canonical data transformations and enrichment
  • platform-specific connectors and APIs
  • standardized error-handling frameworks
  • auditability and enterprise logging conventions
  • governance and compliance embedded at every step

Generic coding models are not trained on this domain structure. They often produce code that looks correct, yet subtly breaks sequencing rules, omits required error handling, mishandles transformations, or violates enterprise logging and naming standards.

Vertical agents, by contrast, are trained specifically to understand flow logic, mappings, middleware orchestration, and integration patterns – across both EAI and iPaaS architectures. They don’t just generate code – they reason in the same structures architects and ICC teams use to design integrations.

This domain grounding is the critical distinction.

The hidden drag: Context latency, expensive context managers, and prompt fatigue

Teams experimenting with generic AI encounter three consistent frictions:

Context Latency

Generic models cannot retain complex platform context across prompts. Developers must repeatedly restate platform rules, logging standards, retry logic, authentication patterns, and canonical schemas.

Developers become “expensive context managers”

A seemingly simple instruction—“Transform XML to JSON and publish to Kafka”—
quickly devolves into a series of corrective prompts:

  • “Use the enterprise logging format.”
  • “Add retries with exponential backoff.”
  • “Fix the transformation rules.”
  • “Apply the standardized error-handling pattern.”

Developers end up managing the model instead of building the solution.

Prompt fatigue

The cycle of re-prompting, patching, and enforcing architectural rules consumes time and erodes confidence in outputs.

This is why generic tools rarely achieve the promised acceleration in integration environments.

Benchmarks show vertical agents are about twice as accurate

CurieTech AI recently published comparative benchmarks evaluating its vertical integration agents against leading generic tools, including Claude Code.
The tests covered real-world tasks:

  • generating complete, multi-step integration flows
  • building cross-system data transformations
  • producing platform-aligned retries and error chains
  • implementing enterprise-standard logging
  • converting business requirements into executable integration logic

The results were clear: generic tools performed at roughly half the accuracy of vertical agents.

Generic outputs often looked plausible but contained structural errors or governance violations that would cause failures in QA or production. Vertical agents produced platform-aligned, fully structured workflows on the first pass.

For integration engineering – where errors cascade – this accuracy gap directly impacts delivery predictability and long-term quality.

The vertical agent advantage: Single-shot solutioning

The defining capability of vertical agents is single-shot task execution.

Generic tools force stepwise prompting and correction. But vertical agents—because they understand patterns, sequencing, and governance—can take a requirement like:

“Create an idempotent order-sync flow from NetSuite to SAP S/4HANA with canonical transformations, retries, and enterprise logging.”

…and return:

  • the flow
  • transformations
  • error handling
  • retries
  • logging
  • and test scaffolding

in one coherent output.

This shift – from instruction-oriented prompting to goal-oriented prompting—removes context latency and prompt fatigue while drastically reducing the need for developer oversight.

Built-in governance: The most underrated benefit

Integrations live and die by adherence to standards. Vertical agents embed those standards directly into generation:

  • naming and folder conventions
  • canonical data models
  • PII masking and sensitive-data controls
  • logging fields and formats
  • retry and exception handling patterns
  • platform-specific best practices

Generic models cannot consistently maintain these rules across prompts or projects.

Vertical agents enforce them automatically, which leads to higher-quality integrations with far fewer QA defects and production issues.

The real ROI: Quality, consistency, predictability

Organizations adopting vertical agents report three consistent benefits:

1. Higher-Quality Integrations

Outputs follow correct patterns and platform rules—reducing defects and architectural drift.

2. Greater Consistency Across Teams

Standardized logic and structures eliminate developer-to-developer variability.

3. More Predictable Delivery Timelines

Less rework means smoother pipelines and faster delivery.

A recent enterprise using CurieTech AI summarized the impact succinctly:

“For MuleSoft users, generic AI tools won’t cut it. But with domain-specific agents, the ROI is clear. Just start.”

For CIOs, these outcomes translate to increased throughput and higher trust in integration delivery.

Preparing for the agentic future

The industry is already moving beyond single responses toward agentic orchestration, where AI systems coordinate requirements gathering, design, mapping, development, testing, documentation, and deployment.

Vertical agents—because they understand multi-step integration workflows—are uniquely suited to lead this transition.

Generic coding agents lack the domain grounding to maintain coherence across these interconnected phases.

The bottom line

Generic coding assistants provide breadth, but vertical AI development agents deliver the depth, structure, and governance enterprise integrations require.

Vertical agents elevate both EAI and iPaaS programs by offering:

  • significantly higher accuracy
  • higher-quality, production-ready outputs
  • built-in governance and compliance
  • consistent logic and transformations
  • predictable delivery cycles

As integration workloads expand and become more central to digital transformation, organizations that adopt vertical AI agents early will deliver faster, with higher accuracy, and with far greater confidence.

In enterprise integrations, specialization isn’t optional—it is the foundation of the next decade of reliability and scale.

Learn more about CurieTech AI here.

Twilio Drives CX with Trust, Simple, and Smart

✇IT Connection
By: siowmeng
S. Soh

Summary Bullets:

  • The combination of omni-channel capability, effective data management, and AI will drive better customer experience.
  • As Twilio’s business evolves from CPaaS to customer experience, the company focuses its product development on themes around trust, simple, and smart.

The ability to provide superior customer experience (CX) helps a business gain customer loyalty and a strong competitive advantage. Many enterprises are looking to AI including generative AI (GenAI) and agentic AI to further boost CX by enabling faster resolution and personalized experiences.

Communications platform-as-a-service (CPaaS) vendors offer a platform that focuses on meeting omni-channel channel communications requirements. These players have now integrated a broader set of capabilities to solve CX challenges, involving different touch points including sales, marketing, and customer service. Twilio is one of the major CPaaS vendors that has moved beyond just communications applications programming interfaces (APIs), including contact center (Twilio Flex), customer data management (Segment), and conversational AI. Twilio’s product development has been focusing on three key themes: Trusted, Simple, and Smart. The company has demonstrated these themes through product announcements throughout 2025 and showcased at its SIGNAL events around the world.

Firstly, Twilio is winning customer trust through its scalable and reliable platform (e.g., 99.99% API reliability), working with all major telecom operators in each market (e.g., Optus, Telstra, and Vodafone in Australia). More importantly, it is helping clients win the trust of their customers. With the rising fraud impacting consumers, Twilio has introduced various capabilities including Silent Network Authentication and FIDO-certified passkey as part of its Verify, a user verification product. The company is also promoting the use of branded communications, which has shown to achieve consumer trust and greater willingness to engage with brands. Twilio has introduced branded calling, RCS for branded messaging, Whatsapp Business Calling, and WebRTC for browser.

The second theme is about simplifying developer experience when using the Twilio platform to achieve better CX outcomes. Twilio has long been in the business of giving businesses the ability to reach their customers through a range of communications channels. With Segment (customer data platform), Twilio enables businesses to leverage their data more effectively for gaining customer insights and taking actions. An example is the recent introduction of Event Triggered Journey (general availability in July 2025), which allows the creation of automated marketing workflows to support personalized customer journeys. This can be used to enable a responsive approach for real-time use cases, such as cart abandonment, onboarding flows, and trial-to-paid account journeys. By taking actions to promptly address issues a customer is facing can improve the chance of having a successful transaction, and a happy customer.

The third theme on ‘smart’ is about leveraging AI to make better decisions, enable differentiated experiences, and build stronger customer relationships. Twilio announced two conversational AI updates in May 2025. The first is ‘Conversational Intelligence’ (generally available for voice and private beta for messaging), which analyzes voice calls and text-based conversations and converting them into structured data and insights. This is useful for understanding sentiments, spotting compliance risks, and identifying churn risks. The other AI capability is ‘ConversationRelay’, which enables developers to create voice AI agents using their preferred LLM and integrate with customer data. Twilio is leveraging speech recognition technology and interrupt handling to enable human-like voice agents. Cedar, a financial experience platform for healthcare providers is leveraging ConversationRelay to automate inbound patient billing calls. Healthcare providers receive large volume of calls from patients seeking clarity on their financial obligations. And the use of ConversationRelay enables AI-powered voice agents to provide quick answers and reduce wait times. This provides a better patient experience and quantifiable outcome compared to traditional chatbots. It is also said to reduce costs. The real test is whether such capabilities impact customer experience metrics, such as net promoter score (NPS).

Today, many businesses use Twilio to enhance customer engagement. At the Twilio SIGNAL Sydney event for example, Twilio customers spoke about their success with Twilio solutions. Crypto.com reduced onboarding times from hours to minutes, Lendi Group (a mortgage FinTech company) highlighted the use of AI agents to engage customers after hours, and Philippines Airlines was exploring Twilio Segment and Twilio Flex to enable personalized customer experiences. There was a general excitement with the use of AI to further enhance CX. However, while businesses are aware of the benefits of using AI to improve customer experience, the challenge has been the ability to do it effectively.

Twilio is simplifying the process with Segment and conversational AI solutions. The company is tackling another major challenge around AI security, through the acquisition of Stytch (completed on November 14, 2025), an identity platform for AI agents. AI agent authentication becomes crucial as more agents are deployed and given access to data and systems. AI agents will also collaborate autonomously through protocols such as Model Context Protocol, which can create security risks without an effective identity framework.

It has come a long way from legacy chatbots to GenAI-powered voice agents, and Twilio is not alone in pursuing AI-powered CX solutions. The market is a long way off from providing quantifiable feedback from customers. Technology vendors enabling customer engagement (e.g., Genesys, Salesforce, and Zendesk) have developed AI capabilities including voice AI agents. The collective efforts and competition within the industry will help to drive awareness and adoption. But it is crucial to get the basics right around data management, security, and cost of deploying AI.

❌